- This topic has 290 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 4 months ago by
jficquette.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 24, 2008 at 2:13 PM #246380July 24, 2008 at 2:14 PM #246172
bsrsharma
ParticipantI once enthusiastically went for a speech by James Irwin who was an Apollo 15 moon walker. I was hoping to listen to some first hand experience. Instead, he preached (a rather weak) evangelizing sermon on how he found God (and Jesus) while standing on the moon and seeing the earth (big blue ball etc.,).
July 24, 2008 at 2:14 PM #246322bsrsharma
ParticipantI once enthusiastically went for a speech by James Irwin who was an Apollo 15 moon walker. I was hoping to listen to some first hand experience. Instead, he preached (a rather weak) evangelizing sermon on how he found God (and Jesus) while standing on the moon and seeing the earth (big blue ball etc.,).
July 24, 2008 at 2:14 PM #246328bsrsharma
ParticipantI once enthusiastically went for a speech by James Irwin who was an Apollo 15 moon walker. I was hoping to listen to some first hand experience. Instead, he preached (a rather weak) evangelizing sermon on how he found God (and Jesus) while standing on the moon and seeing the earth (big blue ball etc.,).
July 24, 2008 at 2:14 PM #246384bsrsharma
ParticipantI once enthusiastically went for a speech by James Irwin who was an Apollo 15 moon walker. I was hoping to listen to some first hand experience. Instead, he preached (a rather weak) evangelizing sermon on how he found God (and Jesus) while standing on the moon and seeing the earth (big blue ball etc.,).
July 24, 2008 at 2:14 PM #246390bsrsharma
ParticipantI once enthusiastically went for a speech by James Irwin who was an Apollo 15 moon walker. I was hoping to listen to some first hand experience. Instead, he preached (a rather weak) evangelizing sermon on how he found God (and Jesus) while standing on the moon and seeing the earth (big blue ball etc.,).
July 24, 2008 at 2:22 PM #246181SDEngineer
Participant4plex:
Considering the only “evidence” that they bring forth is their own testimony, it’s ENTIRELY relevent to look at the credibility of those witnesses, and, frankly, people who habitually wear tinfoil hats don’t have much credibility in my eyes.
The burden of proof is on them – not me. I simply point out that a skeptical person is not likely to attach much credibility to the testimony of someone who clearly believes in a great many notions which are far outside of the scientific mainstream.
July 24, 2008 at 2:22 PM #246332SDEngineer
Participant4plex:
Considering the only “evidence” that they bring forth is their own testimony, it’s ENTIRELY relevent to look at the credibility of those witnesses, and, frankly, people who habitually wear tinfoil hats don’t have much credibility in my eyes.
The burden of proof is on them – not me. I simply point out that a skeptical person is not likely to attach much credibility to the testimony of someone who clearly believes in a great many notions which are far outside of the scientific mainstream.
July 24, 2008 at 2:22 PM #246338SDEngineer
Participant4plex:
Considering the only “evidence” that they bring forth is their own testimony, it’s ENTIRELY relevent to look at the credibility of those witnesses, and, frankly, people who habitually wear tinfoil hats don’t have much credibility in my eyes.
The burden of proof is on them – not me. I simply point out that a skeptical person is not likely to attach much credibility to the testimony of someone who clearly believes in a great many notions which are far outside of the scientific mainstream.
July 24, 2008 at 2:22 PM #246394SDEngineer
Participant4plex:
Considering the only “evidence” that they bring forth is their own testimony, it’s ENTIRELY relevent to look at the credibility of those witnesses, and, frankly, people who habitually wear tinfoil hats don’t have much credibility in my eyes.
The burden of proof is on them – not me. I simply point out that a skeptical person is not likely to attach much credibility to the testimony of someone who clearly believes in a great many notions which are far outside of the scientific mainstream.
July 24, 2008 at 2:22 PM #246400SDEngineer
Participant4plex:
Considering the only “evidence” that they bring forth is their own testimony, it’s ENTIRELY relevent to look at the credibility of those witnesses, and, frankly, people who habitually wear tinfoil hats don’t have much credibility in my eyes.
The burden of proof is on them – not me. I simply point out that a skeptical person is not likely to attach much credibility to the testimony of someone who clearly believes in a great many notions which are far outside of the scientific mainstream.
July 24, 2008 at 2:34 PM #246187jficquette
ParticipantGo over the to the ocean around 3.30 am during Santa Ana conditions and just watch the sky. Look Northwest about 11 o’clock.
They are military and fly out of Vanderberg. I say military because ET’s wouldn’t travel light years to do hook slides and doughnuts in our atmosphere.
I watched 3 ships doing maneuverers until my neck hurt one morning.
Whatever these things are they don’t obey the laws of physics as we claim to understand them.
We already have the technology to make fossil fuels obsolete. My guess is that the technology is easily weaponized and that is one reason we don’t let it out, not to mention what it would do to the economy.
John
July 24, 2008 at 2:34 PM #246337jficquette
ParticipantGo over the to the ocean around 3.30 am during Santa Ana conditions and just watch the sky. Look Northwest about 11 o’clock.
They are military and fly out of Vanderberg. I say military because ET’s wouldn’t travel light years to do hook slides and doughnuts in our atmosphere.
I watched 3 ships doing maneuverers until my neck hurt one morning.
Whatever these things are they don’t obey the laws of physics as we claim to understand them.
We already have the technology to make fossil fuels obsolete. My guess is that the technology is easily weaponized and that is one reason we don’t let it out, not to mention what it would do to the economy.
John
July 24, 2008 at 2:34 PM #246343jficquette
ParticipantGo over the to the ocean around 3.30 am during Santa Ana conditions and just watch the sky. Look Northwest about 11 o’clock.
They are military and fly out of Vanderberg. I say military because ET’s wouldn’t travel light years to do hook slides and doughnuts in our atmosphere.
I watched 3 ships doing maneuverers until my neck hurt one morning.
Whatever these things are they don’t obey the laws of physics as we claim to understand them.
We already have the technology to make fossil fuels obsolete. My guess is that the technology is easily weaponized and that is one reason we don’t let it out, not to mention what it would do to the economy.
John
July 24, 2008 at 2:34 PM #246399jficquette
ParticipantGo over the to the ocean around 3.30 am during Santa Ana conditions and just watch the sky. Look Northwest about 11 o’clock.
They are military and fly out of Vanderberg. I say military because ET’s wouldn’t travel light years to do hook slides and doughnuts in our atmosphere.
I watched 3 ships doing maneuverers until my neck hurt one morning.
Whatever these things are they don’t obey the laws of physics as we claim to understand them.
We already have the technology to make fossil fuels obsolete. My guess is that the technology is easily weaponized and that is one reason we don’t let it out, not to mention what it would do to the economy.
John
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
