- This topic has 185 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 20, 2009 at 4:42 PM #472319October 20, 2009 at 4:44 PM #471484scaredyclassicParticipant
i actually saw the deleted response prior to its deletion. from what i recall, he admitted being a tax protestor and that was the reason for the liens. He advised against attempting to protest taxes because the ‘IRS was unbeatable”. I guess the generous home exemption wasn’t enough for him. He said he was just trying to give good advice based on his experience and knowledge. Personally, i would be very hesitant to take financial advice from a tax protestor.
October 20, 2009 at 4:44 PM #471667scaredyclassicParticipanti actually saw the deleted response prior to its deletion. from what i recall, he admitted being a tax protestor and that was the reason for the liens. He advised against attempting to protest taxes because the ‘IRS was unbeatable”. I guess the generous home exemption wasn’t enough for him. He said he was just trying to give good advice based on his experience and knowledge. Personally, i would be very hesitant to take financial advice from a tax protestor.
October 20, 2009 at 4:44 PM #472027scaredyclassicParticipanti actually saw the deleted response prior to its deletion. from what i recall, he admitted being a tax protestor and that was the reason for the liens. He advised against attempting to protest taxes because the ‘IRS was unbeatable”. I guess the generous home exemption wasn’t enough for him. He said he was just trying to give good advice based on his experience and knowledge. Personally, i would be very hesitant to take financial advice from a tax protestor.
October 20, 2009 at 4:44 PM #472103scaredyclassicParticipanti actually saw the deleted response prior to its deletion. from what i recall, he admitted being a tax protestor and that was the reason for the liens. He advised against attempting to protest taxes because the ‘IRS was unbeatable”. I guess the generous home exemption wasn’t enough for him. He said he was just trying to give good advice based on his experience and knowledge. Personally, i would be very hesitant to take financial advice from a tax protestor.
October 20, 2009 at 4:44 PM #472323scaredyclassicParticipanti actually saw the deleted response prior to its deletion. from what i recall, he admitted being a tax protestor and that was the reason for the liens. He advised against attempting to protest taxes because the ‘IRS was unbeatable”. I guess the generous home exemption wasn’t enough for him. He said he was just trying to give good advice based on his experience and knowledge. Personally, i would be very hesitant to take financial advice from a tax protestor.
October 20, 2009 at 4:57 PM #471489disimilar1ParticipantTo sum it up…yes, it is an obnoxious old sign. Farewell FHAguru
October 20, 2009 at 4:57 PM #471672disimilar1ParticipantTo sum it up…yes, it is an obnoxious old sign. Farewell FHAguru
October 20, 2009 at 4:57 PM #472032disimilar1ParticipantTo sum it up…yes, it is an obnoxious old sign. Farewell FHAguru
October 20, 2009 at 4:57 PM #472108disimilar1ParticipantTo sum it up…yes, it is an obnoxious old sign. Farewell FHAguru
October 20, 2009 at 4:57 PM #472328disimilar1ParticipantTo sum it up…yes, it is an obnoxious old sign. Farewell FHAguru
October 20, 2009 at 8:55 PM #471559scaredyclassicParticipantmaybe i should go make an offer to buy the sign. it’s collectible.
October 20, 2009 at 8:55 PM #471742scaredyclassicParticipantmaybe i should go make an offer to buy the sign. it’s collectible.
October 20, 2009 at 8:55 PM #472102scaredyclassicParticipantmaybe i should go make an offer to buy the sign. it’s collectible.
October 20, 2009 at 8:55 PM #472178scaredyclassicParticipantmaybe i should go make an offer to buy the sign. it’s collectible.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.