- This topic has 1,886 replies, 52 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by
Jazzman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 13, 2009 at 3:57 PM #445249August 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM #444476
SK in CV
ParticipantNo, I’m not particularly troubled by it.
I haven’t seen any compelling evidence that WWII like internment camps are in anyone’s plans. No funding, no facilities, no apparent motivation. Yes, i’ve seen the videos of the so called facilities. And the debunking of those same claims. I have no idea if those that are concerned about these camps believe that I will be the first resident or you will be. Will we both be in there because both our views are outside the mainstream? (roomie! I hope you don’t snore.)
The want ads that i’ve seen are more logically for military prisons and/or foreign facilities. I have problems with both of those, but no current fear that US citizens are going to be rounded up for no particular reason.
To be sure, I’m not dismissing your concern about the idea of internment camps. I will be at the front of the crowd screaming and protesting their existence if they come to be, regardless of their intended occupants. But it confuses me. Who is behind it? Who are their targets? What is their motivation? What is their wherewithall to implement? (the only character on the political scene with both the tiny balls needed and the position of power to actually move things along is no longer the vice president.) Those are questions that, at least for me, have not been adequately answered.
August 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM #444669ParticipantNo, I’m not particularly troubled by it.
I haven’t seen any compelling evidence that WWII like internment camps are in anyone’s plans. No funding, no facilities, no apparent motivation. Yes, i’ve seen the videos of the so called facilities. And the debunking of those same claims. I have no idea if those that are concerned about these camps believe that I will be the first resident or you will be. Will we both be in there because both our views are outside the mainstream? (roomie! I hope you don’t snore.)
The want ads that i’ve seen are more logically for military prisons and/or foreign facilities. I have problems with both of those, but no current fear that US citizens are going to be rounded up for no particular reason.
To be sure, I’m not dismissing your concern about the idea of internment camps. I will be at the front of the crowd screaming and protesting their existence if they come to be, regardless of their intended occupants. But it confuses me. Who is behind it? Who are their targets? What is their motivation? What is their wherewithall to implement? (the only character on the political scene with both the tiny balls needed and the position of power to actually move things along is no longer the vice president.) Those are questions that, at least for me, have not been adequately answered.
August 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM #445006ParticipantNo, I’m not particularly troubled by it.
I haven’t seen any compelling evidence that WWII like internment camps are in anyone’s plans. No funding, no facilities, no apparent motivation. Yes, i’ve seen the videos of the so called facilities. And the debunking of those same claims. I have no idea if those that are concerned about these camps believe that I will be the first resident or you will be. Will we both be in there because both our views are outside the mainstream? (roomie! I hope you don’t snore.)
The want ads that i’ve seen are more logically for military prisons and/or foreign facilities. I have problems with both of those, but no current fear that US citizens are going to be rounded up for no particular reason.
To be sure, I’m not dismissing your concern about the idea of internment camps. I will be at the front of the crowd screaming and protesting their existence if they come to be, regardless of their intended occupants. But it confuses me. Who is behind it? Who are their targets? What is their motivation? What is their wherewithall to implement? (the only character on the political scene with both the tiny balls needed and the position of power to actually move things along is no longer the vice president.) Those are questions that, at least for me, have not been adequately answered.
August 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM #445076ParticipantNo, I’m not particularly troubled by it.
I haven’t seen any compelling evidence that WWII like internment camps are in anyone’s plans. No funding, no facilities, no apparent motivation. Yes, i’ve seen the videos of the so called facilities. And the debunking of those same claims. I have no idea if those that are concerned about these camps believe that I will be the first resident or you will be. Will we both be in there because both our views are outside the mainstream? (roomie! I hope you don’t snore.)
The want ads that i’ve seen are more logically for military prisons and/or foreign facilities. I have problems with both of those, but no current fear that US citizens are going to be rounded up for no particular reason.
To be sure, I’m not dismissing your concern about the idea of internment camps. I will be at the front of the crowd screaming and protesting their existence if they come to be, regardless of their intended occupants. But it confuses me. Who is behind it? Who are their targets? What is their motivation? What is their wherewithall to implement? (the only character on the political scene with both the tiny balls needed and the position of power to actually move things along is no longer the vice president.) Those are questions that, at least for me, have not been adequately answered.
August 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM #445254ParticipantNo, I’m not particularly troubled by it.
I haven’t seen any compelling evidence that WWII like internment camps are in anyone’s plans. No funding, no facilities, no apparent motivation. Yes, i’ve seen the videos of the so called facilities. And the debunking of those same claims. I have no idea if those that are concerned about these camps believe that I will be the first resident or you will be. Will we both be in there because both our views are outside the mainstream? (roomie! I hope you don’t snore.)
The want ads that i’ve seen are more logically for military prisons and/or foreign facilities. I have problems with both of those, but no current fear that US citizens are going to be rounded up for no particular reason.
To be sure, I’m not dismissing your concern about the idea of internment camps. I will be at the front of the crowd screaming and protesting their existence if they come to be, regardless of their intended occupants. But it confuses me. Who is behind it? Who are their targets? What is their motivation? What is their wherewithall to implement? (the only character on the political scene with both the tiny balls needed and the position of power to actually move things along is no longer the vice president.) Those are questions that, at least for me, have not been adequately answered.
August 13, 2009 at 4:47 PM #444481Zeitgeist
ParticipantThanks SK for the info and support. Crazy times. I will see you at the protest. I will be the one with the cane. As for my other fan, I am not changing the topic. I think it is all about the same problem, too much government or is it one world government? Is this a health related topic? With or without Obama care, are you planning to get vaccinated? Just curious. The haste to create a vaccine has changed some of the procedures. This is one being considered: Caterpillar cells and genetically engineered bacilovirus might provide a better means to make influenza vaccines.
August 13, 2009 at 4:47 PM #444674ParticipantThanks SK for the info and support. Crazy times. I will see you at the protest. I will be the one with the cane. As for my other fan, I am not changing the topic. I think it is all about the same problem, too much government or is it one world government? Is this a health related topic? With or without Obama care, are you planning to get vaccinated? Just curious. The haste to create a vaccine has changed some of the procedures. This is one being considered: Caterpillar cells and genetically engineered bacilovirus might provide a better means to make influenza vaccines.
August 13, 2009 at 4:47 PM #445011ParticipantThanks SK for the info and support. Crazy times. I will see you at the protest. I will be the one with the cane. As for my other fan, I am not changing the topic. I think it is all about the same problem, too much government or is it one world government? Is this a health related topic? With or without Obama care, are you planning to get vaccinated? Just curious. The haste to create a vaccine has changed some of the procedures. This is one being considered: Caterpillar cells and genetically engineered bacilovirus might provide a better means to make influenza vaccines.
August 13, 2009 at 4:47 PM #445081ParticipantThanks SK for the info and support. Crazy times. I will see you at the protest. I will be the one with the cane. As for my other fan, I am not changing the topic. I think it is all about the same problem, too much government or is it one world government? Is this a health related topic? With or without Obama care, are you planning to get vaccinated? Just curious. The haste to create a vaccine has changed some of the procedures. This is one being considered: Caterpillar cells and genetically engineered bacilovirus might provide a better means to make influenza vaccines.
August 13, 2009 at 4:47 PM #445259ParticipantThanks SK for the info and support. Crazy times. I will see you at the protest. I will be the one with the cane. As for my other fan, I am not changing the topic. I think it is all about the same problem, too much government or is it one world government? Is this a health related topic? With or without Obama care, are you planning to get vaccinated? Just curious. The haste to create a vaccine has changed some of the procedures. This is one being considered: Caterpillar cells and genetically engineered bacilovirus might provide a better means to make influenza vaccines.
August 13, 2009 at 6:04 PM #444486Arraya
ParticipantOrrin Hatch and a few others already made deals with big pharma at the end of July.
These guys get 12 years of exclusive use on their drugs instead of the normal 7 years.
This has flown UNDER THE RADAR of MSM.Health Care Reform: Senate HELP adopts 12 Year Patent Exclusivity for Biologic Drugs
August 13, 2009 at 6:04 PM #444679ParticipantOrrin Hatch and a few others already made deals with big pharma at the end of July.
These guys get 12 years of exclusive use on their drugs instead of the normal 7 years.
This has flown UNDER THE RADAR of MSM.Health Care Reform: Senate HELP adopts 12 Year Patent Exclusivity for Biologic Drugs
August 13, 2009 at 6:04 PM #445016ParticipantOrrin Hatch and a few others already made deals with big pharma at the end of July.
These guys get 12 years of exclusive use on their drugs instead of the normal 7 years.
This has flown UNDER THE RADAR of MSM.Health Care Reform: Senate HELP adopts 12 Year Patent Exclusivity for Biologic Drugs
August 13, 2009 at 6:04 PM #445086ParticipantOrrin Hatch and a few others already made deals with big pharma at the end of July.
These guys get 12 years of exclusive use on their drugs instead of the normal 7 years.
This has flown UNDER THE RADAR of MSM.Health Care Reform: Senate HELP adopts 12 Year Patent Exclusivity for Biologic Drugs
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.