- This topic has 1,886 replies, 52 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by Jazzman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 7, 2009 at 4:06 PM #454773September 7, 2009 at 4:19 PM #453971surveyorParticipant
[quote=afx114]Also, if France, Canada, England, Japan, etc ration healthcare so bad, how do you explain the fact that they have by far a higher life expectancy and lower infant mortality than the US? The higher life-expectancy is even better for those over age 60 in those countries. Must be all that rationing I guess?[/quote]
It’s interesting that you say that afx because I mentioned to sdgrrl that when you take into account that many Americans die from traffic accidents and homicides, the U.S. life expectancy jumps to the top.
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_life_expectancy_were_number_1/
http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=psc_working_papers
Much like the median housing price must be examined and not extrapolated to mean that the housing bubble is over, you should really examine the numbers a bit.
I find it interesting that many people on this board would never take a realtor’s information at face value but would take the word of policitians and spout it like gold.
edit: not speaking to you specifically, afx, just in general.
September 7, 2009 at 4:19 PM #454165surveyorParticipant[quote=afx114]Also, if France, Canada, England, Japan, etc ration healthcare so bad, how do you explain the fact that they have by far a higher life expectancy and lower infant mortality than the US? The higher life-expectancy is even better for those over age 60 in those countries. Must be all that rationing I guess?[/quote]
It’s interesting that you say that afx because I mentioned to sdgrrl that when you take into account that many Americans die from traffic accidents and homicides, the U.S. life expectancy jumps to the top.
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_life_expectancy_were_number_1/
http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=psc_working_papers
Much like the median housing price must be examined and not extrapolated to mean that the housing bubble is over, you should really examine the numbers a bit.
I find it interesting that many people on this board would never take a realtor’s information at face value but would take the word of policitians and spout it like gold.
edit: not speaking to you specifically, afx, just in general.
September 7, 2009 at 4:19 PM #454506surveyorParticipant[quote=afx114]Also, if France, Canada, England, Japan, etc ration healthcare so bad, how do you explain the fact that they have by far a higher life expectancy and lower infant mortality than the US? The higher life-expectancy is even better for those over age 60 in those countries. Must be all that rationing I guess?[/quote]
It’s interesting that you say that afx because I mentioned to sdgrrl that when you take into account that many Americans die from traffic accidents and homicides, the U.S. life expectancy jumps to the top.
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_life_expectancy_were_number_1/
http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=psc_working_papers
Much like the median housing price must be examined and not extrapolated to mean that the housing bubble is over, you should really examine the numbers a bit.
I find it interesting that many people on this board would never take a realtor’s information at face value but would take the word of policitians and spout it like gold.
edit: not speaking to you specifically, afx, just in general.
September 7, 2009 at 4:19 PM #454577surveyorParticipant[quote=afx114]Also, if France, Canada, England, Japan, etc ration healthcare so bad, how do you explain the fact that they have by far a higher life expectancy and lower infant mortality than the US? The higher life-expectancy is even better for those over age 60 in those countries. Must be all that rationing I guess?[/quote]
It’s interesting that you say that afx because I mentioned to sdgrrl that when you take into account that many Americans die from traffic accidents and homicides, the U.S. life expectancy jumps to the top.
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_life_expectancy_were_number_1/
http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=psc_working_papers
Much like the median housing price must be examined and not extrapolated to mean that the housing bubble is over, you should really examine the numbers a bit.
I find it interesting that many people on this board would never take a realtor’s information at face value but would take the word of policitians and spout it like gold.
edit: not speaking to you specifically, afx, just in general.
September 7, 2009 at 4:19 PM #454768surveyorParticipant[quote=afx114]Also, if France, Canada, England, Japan, etc ration healthcare so bad, how do you explain the fact that they have by far a higher life expectancy and lower infant mortality than the US? The higher life-expectancy is even better for those over age 60 in those countries. Must be all that rationing I guess?[/quote]
It’s interesting that you say that afx because I mentioned to sdgrrl that when you take into account that many Americans die from traffic accidents and homicides, the U.S. life expectancy jumps to the top.
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_life_expectancy_were_number_1/
http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=psc_working_papers
Much like the median housing price must be examined and not extrapolated to mean that the housing bubble is over, you should really examine the numbers a bit.
I find it interesting that many people on this board would never take a realtor’s information at face value but would take the word of policitians and spout it like gold.
edit: not speaking to you specifically, afx, just in general.
September 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM #453986patbParticipant[quote=afx114]
And how is a public option going to stifle innovation? This isn’t a bill about funding research — it is a bill about paying for medical care. The majority of research happens in universities, many of which are public. When’s the last time you heard of a corporation coming up with a breakthrough in something other than a drug to make your weiner hard? [/quote]Rogaine.
September 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM #454180patbParticipant[quote=afx114]
And how is a public option going to stifle innovation? This isn’t a bill about funding research — it is a bill about paying for medical care. The majority of research happens in universities, many of which are public. When’s the last time you heard of a corporation coming up with a breakthrough in something other than a drug to make your weiner hard? [/quote]Rogaine.
September 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM #454521patbParticipant[quote=afx114]
And how is a public option going to stifle innovation? This isn’t a bill about funding research — it is a bill about paying for medical care. The majority of research happens in universities, many of which are public. When’s the last time you heard of a corporation coming up with a breakthrough in something other than a drug to make your weiner hard? [/quote]Rogaine.
September 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM #454591patbParticipant[quote=afx114]
And how is a public option going to stifle innovation? This isn’t a bill about funding research — it is a bill about paying for medical care. The majority of research happens in universities, many of which are public. When’s the last time you heard of a corporation coming up with a breakthrough in something other than a drug to make your weiner hard? [/quote]Rogaine.
September 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM #454783patbParticipant[quote=afx114]
And how is a public option going to stifle innovation? This isn’t a bill about funding research — it is a bill about paying for medical care. The majority of research happens in universities, many of which are public. When’s the last time you heard of a corporation coming up with a breakthrough in something other than a drug to make your weiner hard? [/quote]Rogaine.
September 7, 2009 at 5:29 PM #453991patbParticipant[quote=jonnycsd]The OT founda great video. I recently saw this one and think it does an even better job of laying out the pitfalls of a nationalized health system . . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdx_2cuPgQQ%5B/quote%5D
Stossel has been on the GOP payroll for years.
30% of all insurance premiums go to overhead, medicare spends 2%.
September 7, 2009 at 5:29 PM #454184patbParticipant[quote=jonnycsd]The OT founda great video. I recently saw this one and think it does an even better job of laying out the pitfalls of a nationalized health system . . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdx_2cuPgQQ%5B/quote%5D
Stossel has been on the GOP payroll for years.
30% of all insurance premiums go to overhead, medicare spends 2%.
September 7, 2009 at 5:29 PM #454526patbParticipant[quote=jonnycsd]The OT founda great video. I recently saw this one and think it does an even better job of laying out the pitfalls of a nationalized health system . . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdx_2cuPgQQ%5B/quote%5D
Stossel has been on the GOP payroll for years.
30% of all insurance premiums go to overhead, medicare spends 2%.
September 7, 2009 at 5:29 PM #454596patbParticipant[quote=jonnycsd]The OT founda great video. I recently saw this one and think it does an even better job of laying out the pitfalls of a nationalized health system . . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdx_2cuPgQQ%5B/quote%5D
Stossel has been on the GOP payroll for years.
30% of all insurance premiums go to overhead, medicare spends 2%.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.