- This topic has 275 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by an.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM #230394June 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM #230218EconProfParticipant
It is great sport to bash the rich, and to the average American, $250k per year surely qualifies. But not enough revenue will be generated since this cohort is simply too small in numbers. Probably under 5% of all taxpayers.
Expect Obama and the Democrat-controlled House and Senate to “correct” that threshold to $150k or $100k once in office.June 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM #230340EconProfParticipantIt is great sport to bash the rich, and to the average American, $250k per year surely qualifies. But not enough revenue will be generated since this cohort is simply too small in numbers. Probably under 5% of all taxpayers.
Expect Obama and the Democrat-controlled House and Senate to “correct” that threshold to $150k or $100k once in office.June 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM #230347EconProfParticipantIt is great sport to bash the rich, and to the average American, $250k per year surely qualifies. But not enough revenue will be generated since this cohort is simply too small in numbers. Probably under 5% of all taxpayers.
Expect Obama and the Democrat-controlled House and Senate to “correct” that threshold to $150k or $100k once in office.June 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM #230384EconProfParticipantIt is great sport to bash the rich, and to the average American, $250k per year surely qualifies. But not enough revenue will be generated since this cohort is simply too small in numbers. Probably under 5% of all taxpayers.
Expect Obama and the Democrat-controlled House and Senate to “correct” that threshold to $150k or $100k once in office.June 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM #230399EconProfParticipantIt is great sport to bash the rich, and to the average American, $250k per year surely qualifies. But not enough revenue will be generated since this cohort is simply too small in numbers. Probably under 5% of all taxpayers.
Expect Obama and the Democrat-controlled House and Senate to “correct” that threshold to $150k or $100k once in office.June 28, 2008 at 3:59 PM #230261AnonymousGuest[quote=kev374]It is an OUTRAGE to consider someone earning $125k/yr as “wealthy” when that income can’t even afford a decent single family home over here in Orange County. People earning $125k/yr already pay 48% in marginal taxes, you want to increase it.. Have you lost your mind?? Have you gone INSANE??
[/quote]
Yes. Demacommies are insane.
June 28, 2008 at 3:59 PM #230381AnonymousGuest[quote=kev374]It is an OUTRAGE to consider someone earning $125k/yr as “wealthy” when that income can’t even afford a decent single family home over here in Orange County. People earning $125k/yr already pay 48% in marginal taxes, you want to increase it.. Have you lost your mind?? Have you gone INSANE??
[/quote]
Yes. Demacommies are insane.
June 28, 2008 at 3:59 PM #230387AnonymousGuest[quote=kev374]It is an OUTRAGE to consider someone earning $125k/yr as “wealthy” when that income can’t even afford a decent single family home over here in Orange County. People earning $125k/yr already pay 48% in marginal taxes, you want to increase it.. Have you lost your mind?? Have you gone INSANE??
[/quote]
Yes. Demacommies are insane.
June 28, 2008 at 3:59 PM #230426AnonymousGuest[quote=kev374]It is an OUTRAGE to consider someone earning $125k/yr as “wealthy” when that income can’t even afford a decent single family home over here in Orange County. People earning $125k/yr already pay 48% in marginal taxes, you want to increase it.. Have you lost your mind?? Have you gone INSANE??
[/quote]
Yes. Demacommies are insane.
June 28, 2008 at 3:59 PM #230440AnonymousGuest[quote=kev374]It is an OUTRAGE to consider someone earning $125k/yr as “wealthy” when that income can’t even afford a decent single family home over here in Orange County. People earning $125k/yr already pay 48% in marginal taxes, you want to increase it.. Have you lost your mind?? Have you gone INSANE??
[/quote]
Yes. Demacommies are insane.
June 28, 2008 at 4:13 PM #230266sdnativesonParticipantAs usual, comments and judgements are rushed to with not enough information, this is directed primarily to blue_sky.
If you look at Obamas “blueprint” for his administrations policies well, two points are glaring (for those who choose to exercise intellectual integrity) more government control over the citizenry and more taxes.
Anyone see the bill he is currently sponsoring with Hagel? http://obama.senate.gov/press/071211-obama_hagel_can/. How is that justifiable given the circumstances in our own country?
June 28, 2008 at 4:13 PM #230386sdnativesonParticipantAs usual, comments and judgements are rushed to with not enough information, this is directed primarily to blue_sky.
If you look at Obamas “blueprint” for his administrations policies well, two points are glaring (for those who choose to exercise intellectual integrity) more government control over the citizenry and more taxes.
Anyone see the bill he is currently sponsoring with Hagel? http://obama.senate.gov/press/071211-obama_hagel_can/. How is that justifiable given the circumstances in our own country?
June 28, 2008 at 4:13 PM #230392sdnativesonParticipantAs usual, comments and judgements are rushed to with not enough information, this is directed primarily to blue_sky.
If you look at Obamas “blueprint” for his administrations policies well, two points are glaring (for those who choose to exercise intellectual integrity) more government control over the citizenry and more taxes.
Anyone see the bill he is currently sponsoring with Hagel? http://obama.senate.gov/press/071211-obama_hagel_can/. How is that justifiable given the circumstances in our own country?
June 28, 2008 at 4:13 PM #230431sdnativesonParticipantAs usual, comments and judgements are rushed to with not enough information, this is directed primarily to blue_sky.
If you look at Obamas “blueprint” for his administrations policies well, two points are glaring (for those who choose to exercise intellectual integrity) more government control over the citizenry and more taxes.
Anyone see the bill he is currently sponsoring with Hagel? http://obama.senate.gov/press/071211-obama_hagel_can/. How is that justifiable given the circumstances in our own country?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.