- This topic has 275 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by an.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 28, 2008 at 11:08 AM #13148June 28, 2008 at 11:40 AM #230050afx114Participant
if you have 2 high income people making high 100k, it might be better to stay single than get married on paper.
If you’re going to avoid marriage for tax purposes, I think that maybe your priorities are a little backwards.
June 28, 2008 at 11:40 AM #230170afx114Participantif you have 2 high income people making high 100k, it might be better to stay single than get married on paper.
If you’re going to avoid marriage for tax purposes, I think that maybe your priorities are a little backwards.
June 28, 2008 at 11:40 AM #230177afx114Participantif you have 2 high income people making high 100k, it might be better to stay single than get married on paper.
If you’re going to avoid marriage for tax purposes, I think that maybe your priorities are a little backwards.
June 28, 2008 at 11:40 AM #230215afx114Participantif you have 2 high income people making high 100k, it might be better to stay single than get married on paper.
If you’re going to avoid marriage for tax purposes, I think that maybe your priorities are a little backwards.
June 28, 2008 at 11:40 AM #230231afx114Participantif you have 2 high income people making high 100k, it might be better to stay single than get married on paper.
If you’re going to avoid marriage for tax purposes, I think that maybe your priorities are a little backwards.
June 28, 2008 at 12:53 PM #230111anParticipant[quote=afx114]If you’re going to avoid marriage for tax purposes, I think that maybe your priorities are a little backwards.[/quote]
I agree, it’s not something I’d do, but that’s something someone else would. Just like pre-nup, divorce, etc. Two people can still live together like a married couple, but they might not want to get that paper that say they’re married if it means they’ll have to pay more in taxes. A marriage is much more than just a piece of paper. All I’m trying to say is, married couple should not be taxed more than single person.June 28, 2008 at 12:53 PM #230230anParticipant[quote=afx114]If you’re going to avoid marriage for tax purposes, I think that maybe your priorities are a little backwards.[/quote]
I agree, it’s not something I’d do, but that’s something someone else would. Just like pre-nup, divorce, etc. Two people can still live together like a married couple, but they might not want to get that paper that say they’re married if it means they’ll have to pay more in taxes. A marriage is much more than just a piece of paper. All I’m trying to say is, married couple should not be taxed more than single person.June 28, 2008 at 12:53 PM #230237anParticipant[quote=afx114]If you’re going to avoid marriage for tax purposes, I think that maybe your priorities are a little backwards.[/quote]
I agree, it’s not something I’d do, but that’s something someone else would. Just like pre-nup, divorce, etc. Two people can still live together like a married couple, but they might not want to get that paper that say they’re married if it means they’ll have to pay more in taxes. A marriage is much more than just a piece of paper. All I’m trying to say is, married couple should not be taxed more than single person.June 28, 2008 at 12:53 PM #230273anParticipant[quote=afx114]If you’re going to avoid marriage for tax purposes, I think that maybe your priorities are a little backwards.[/quote]
I agree, it’s not something I’d do, but that’s something someone else would. Just like pre-nup, divorce, etc. Two people can still live together like a married couple, but they might not want to get that paper that say they’re married if it means they’ll have to pay more in taxes. A marriage is much more than just a piece of paper. All I’m trying to say is, married couple should not be taxed more than single person.June 28, 2008 at 12:53 PM #230288anParticipant[quote=afx114]If you’re going to avoid marriage for tax purposes, I think that maybe your priorities are a little backwards.[/quote]
I agree, it’s not something I’d do, but that’s something someone else would. Just like pre-nup, divorce, etc. Two people can still live together like a married couple, but they might not want to get that paper that say they’re married if it means they’ll have to pay more in taxes. A marriage is much more than just a piece of paper. All I’m trying to say is, married couple should not be taxed more than single person.June 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM #230150kev374ParticipantIt is an OUTRAGE to consider someone earning $125k/yr as “wealthy” when that income can’t even afford a decent single family home over here in Orange County. People earning $125k/yr already pay 48% in marginal taxes, you want to increase it.. Have you lost your mind?? Have you gone INSANE??
June 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM #230269kev374ParticipantIt is an OUTRAGE to consider someone earning $125k/yr as “wealthy” when that income can’t even afford a decent single family home over here in Orange County. People earning $125k/yr already pay 48% in marginal taxes, you want to increase it.. Have you lost your mind?? Have you gone INSANE??
June 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM #230277kev374ParticipantIt is an OUTRAGE to consider someone earning $125k/yr as “wealthy” when that income can’t even afford a decent single family home over here in Orange County. People earning $125k/yr already pay 48% in marginal taxes, you want to increase it.. Have you lost your mind?? Have you gone INSANE??
June 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM #230314kev374ParticipantIt is an OUTRAGE to consider someone earning $125k/yr as “wealthy” when that income can’t even afford a decent single family home over here in Orange County. People earning $125k/yr already pay 48% in marginal taxes, you want to increase it.. Have you lost your mind?? Have you gone INSANE??
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.