Obama moving back to economic center?

[LA_Renter]

“I have to look at the fiscal bottom line for my family. I resent paying higher taxes for government programs that I do not support.
Obama needs to figure this out or suffer the consequences.”

Those are my sentiments. Regarding the misery index Big Picture had an interesting take on the Current misery index, here are the links

http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/06/misery-index-ap.html#comments

http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/06/enhanced-mise-1.html#comments

In reality The Bush administration is holding its own with Carter in the misery category. (Does anybody hear Larry Kudlow screaming)

Obama is a classic liberal and he doesn’t seem to try to hide from it unlike previous Democratic politicians. At least he is straight forward. I don’t get that he is an idealogue which is my biggest beef with the last batch of Republicans. If he were to become president he has no choice but to govern from the center given that this is still a slightly right of center nation. After having very recently tasted what it is like being put into the wilderness the Democrats will be very cautious with their agendas. Many of them remember Carter too. One wrong step and Republicans will easily take the House in 2010.

[jficquette]

80% if not more of democrats don’t pay any federal income tax.

[jficquette]

80% if not more of democrats don’t pay any federal income tax.

[jficquette]

80% if not more of democrats don’t pay any federal income tax.

[jficquette]

80% if not more of democrats don’t pay any federal income tax.

[jficquette]

80% if not more of democrats don’t pay any federal income tax.

[CricketOnTheHearth]

You are claiming that 80% of Democrats make less than $19,000 a year? I doubt that.

That would mean that something like 20% of the country made less than that amount.

… then again, if that is true, can you blame them for voting to get a little of that gravy on their gruel?

>chirp<

[CricketOnTheHearth]

You are claiming that 80% of Democrats make less than $19,000 a year? I doubt that.

That would mean that something like 20% of the country made less than that amount.

… then again, if that is true, can you blame them for voting to get a little of that gravy on their gruel?

>chirp<

[CricketOnTheHearth]

You are claiming that 80% of Democrats make less than $19,000 a year? I doubt that.

That would mean that something like 20% of the country made less than that amount.

… then again, if that is true, can you blame them for voting to get a little of that gravy on their gruel?

>chirp<

[CricketOnTheHearth]

You are claiming that 80% of Democrats make less than $19,000 a year? I doubt that.

That would mean that something like 20% of the country made less than that amount.

… then again, if that is true, can you blame them for voting to get a little of that gravy on their gruel?

>chirp<

[CricketOnTheHearth]

You are claiming that 80% of Democrats make less than $19,000 a year? I doubt that.

That would mean that something like 20% of the country made less than that amount.

… then again, if that is true, can you blame them for voting to get a little of that gravy on their gruel?

>chirp<

[Aecetia]

I cannot disagree with you LA_Renter on Bush. He is no Ronald Reagan.

[Aecetia]

I cannot disagree with you LA_Renter on Bush. He is no Ronald Reagan.

[Aecetia]

I cannot disagree with you LA_Renter on Bush. He is no Ronald Reagan.

[Aecetia]

I cannot disagree with you LA_Renter on Bush. He is no Ronald Reagan.

[Author]

Posts