Obama is the great hype machine

[drunkle]

“I was referring to our exchanging criticisms.”

i’m still not getting it. it may have to do with the fact that i’m on my 3rd or 8th glass of wine.

for the record, i like(d) edwards and paul. i think obama is a robot.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

drunkle: It’s probably not the wine, but the fact that I have been simultaneously working and posting. I probably went off the beam there, in a vain attempt to be clever.

I like Paul. I’d like to say I support McCain as well, but he has whored and pandered with the best of them, so I’d be hard pressed to argue integrity and ideological purity and then throw my support his way.

As far as Edwards goes, take a hard look at his “income equality” approach and then juxtapose that with his unwillingness to extend those same standards to attorneys. Big surprise, huh?

Obama might be a robot, but he seems to be invigorating the electorate, which is a really good thing. If he gets the vote out…

[Allan from Fallbrook]

drunkle: It’s probably not the wine, but the fact that I have been simultaneously working and posting. I probably went off the beam there, in a vain attempt to be clever.

I like Paul. I’d like to say I support McCain as well, but he has whored and pandered with the best of them, so I’d be hard pressed to argue integrity and ideological purity and then throw my support his way.

As far as Edwards goes, take a hard look at his “income equality” approach and then juxtapose that with his unwillingness to extend those same standards to attorneys. Big surprise, huh?

Obama might be a robot, but he seems to be invigorating the electorate, which is a really good thing. If he gets the vote out…

[Allan from Fallbrook]

drunkle: It’s probably not the wine, but the fact that I have been simultaneously working and posting. I probably went off the beam there, in a vain attempt to be clever.

I like Paul. I’d like to say I support McCain as well, but he has whored and pandered with the best of them, so I’d be hard pressed to argue integrity and ideological purity and then throw my support his way.

As far as Edwards goes, take a hard look at his “income equality” approach and then juxtapose that with his unwillingness to extend those same standards to attorneys. Big surprise, huh?

Obama might be a robot, but he seems to be invigorating the electorate, which is a really good thing. If he gets the vote out…

[Allan from Fallbrook]

drunkle: It’s probably not the wine, but the fact that I have been simultaneously working and posting. I probably went off the beam there, in a vain attempt to be clever.

I like Paul. I’d like to say I support McCain as well, but he has whored and pandered with the best of them, so I’d be hard pressed to argue integrity and ideological purity and then throw my support his way.

As far as Edwards goes, take a hard look at his “income equality” approach and then juxtapose that with his unwillingness to extend those same standards to attorneys. Big surprise, huh?

Obama might be a robot, but he seems to be invigorating the electorate, which is a really good thing. If he gets the vote out…

[Allan from Fallbrook]

drunkle: It’s probably not the wine, but the fact that I have been simultaneously working and posting. I probably went off the beam there, in a vain attempt to be clever.

I like Paul. I’d like to say I support McCain as well, but he has whored and pandered with the best of them, so I’d be hard pressed to argue integrity and ideological purity and then throw my support his way.

As far as Edwards goes, take a hard look at his “income equality” approach and then juxtapose that with his unwillingness to extend those same standards to attorneys. Big surprise, huh?

Obama might be a robot, but he seems to be invigorating the electorate, which is a really good thing. If he gets the vote out…

[drunkle]

“I probably went off the beam there, in a vain attempt to be clever.”

see? you’re not stupid. anyone who can admit vanity, or at least, the possibility of vanity is ok with me. hell, i post because i like reading my own writing.

there is no depth to my liking of edwards. i liked his presence in 04, i like his willingness to take on corporate influence in politics. it’s a very focused and direct attack vs obama’s general hope that things will change. if i ran for president, my platform would be mono issue: political reform. elimination of the electoral college, elimination of congress for parlimentary government, elimination of the 2 party duopoly, public sponsorship of campaigns… and 20 year term as president. with some provision for recall, of course. after i reigned for 20 years, of course.

i’m suspicious of “the electorate”, the same electorate that voted in bush twice. the same knee jerk bone heads that rah rah’d the invasion of iraq and forgot about al queda. maybe this time, the electorate will be smarter? doubtful.

[drunkle]

“I probably went off the beam there, in a vain attempt to be clever.”

see? you’re not stupid. anyone who can admit vanity, or at least, the possibility of vanity is ok with me. hell, i post because i like reading my own writing.

there is no depth to my liking of edwards. i liked his presence in 04, i like his willingness to take on corporate influence in politics. it’s a very focused and direct attack vs obama’s general hope that things will change. if i ran for president, my platform would be mono issue: political reform. elimination of the electoral college, elimination of congress for parlimentary government, elimination of the 2 party duopoly, public sponsorship of campaigns… and 20 year term as president. with some provision for recall, of course. after i reigned for 20 years, of course.

i’m suspicious of “the electorate”, the same electorate that voted in bush twice. the same knee jerk bone heads that rah rah’d the invasion of iraq and forgot about al queda. maybe this time, the electorate will be smarter? doubtful.

[drunkle]

“I probably went off the beam there, in a vain attempt to be clever.”

see? you’re not stupid. anyone who can admit vanity, or at least, the possibility of vanity is ok with me. hell, i post because i like reading my own writing.

there is no depth to my liking of edwards. i liked his presence in 04, i like his willingness to take on corporate influence in politics. it’s a very focused and direct attack vs obama’s general hope that things will change. if i ran for president, my platform would be mono issue: political reform. elimination of the electoral college, elimination of congress for parlimentary government, elimination of the 2 party duopoly, public sponsorship of campaigns… and 20 year term as president. with some provision for recall, of course. after i reigned for 20 years, of course.

i’m suspicious of “the electorate”, the same electorate that voted in bush twice. the same knee jerk bone heads that rah rah’d the invasion of iraq and forgot about al queda. maybe this time, the electorate will be smarter? doubtful.

[drunkle]

“I probably went off the beam there, in a vain attempt to be clever.”

see? you’re not stupid. anyone who can admit vanity, or at least, the possibility of vanity is ok with me. hell, i post because i like reading my own writing.

there is no depth to my liking of edwards. i liked his presence in 04, i like his willingness to take on corporate influence in politics. it’s a very focused and direct attack vs obama’s general hope that things will change. if i ran for president, my platform would be mono issue: political reform. elimination of the electoral college, elimination of congress for parlimentary government, elimination of the 2 party duopoly, public sponsorship of campaigns… and 20 year term as president. with some provision for recall, of course. after i reigned for 20 years, of course.

i’m suspicious of “the electorate”, the same electorate that voted in bush twice. the same knee jerk bone heads that rah rah’d the invasion of iraq and forgot about al queda. maybe this time, the electorate will be smarter? doubtful.

[drunkle]

“I probably went off the beam there, in a vain attempt to be clever.”

see? you’re not stupid. anyone who can admit vanity, or at least, the possibility of vanity is ok with me. hell, i post because i like reading my own writing.

there is no depth to my liking of edwards. i liked his presence in 04, i like his willingness to take on corporate influence in politics. it’s a very focused and direct attack vs obama’s general hope that things will change. if i ran for president, my platform would be mono issue: political reform. elimination of the electoral college, elimination of congress for parlimentary government, elimination of the 2 party duopoly, public sponsorship of campaigns… and 20 year term as president. with some provision for recall, of course. after i reigned for 20 years, of course.

i’m suspicious of “the electorate”, the same electorate that voted in bush twice. the same knee jerk bone heads that rah rah’d the invasion of iraq and forgot about al queda. maybe this time, the electorate will be smarter? doubtful.

[mixxalot]

Mitt Romney

I cannot stand this jerk. He is an arrogant pretty boy LDS freak and robber baron .

I am rooting for Ron Paul. Duncan Hunter is a close second. I am surprised how many suckers want Mitt or that other right wing zealot freak, Huckabee.

[mixxalot]

Mitt Romney

I cannot stand this jerk. He is an arrogant pretty boy LDS freak and robber baron .

I am rooting for Ron Paul. Duncan Hunter is a close second. I am surprised how many suckers want Mitt or that other right wing zealot freak, Huckabee.

[mixxalot]

Mitt Romney

I cannot stand this jerk. He is an arrogant pretty boy LDS freak and robber baron .

I am rooting for Ron Paul. Duncan Hunter is a close second. I am surprised how many suckers want Mitt or that other right wing zealot freak, Huckabee.

[mixxalot]

Mitt Romney

I cannot stand this jerk. He is an arrogant pretty boy LDS freak and robber baron .

I am rooting for Ron Paul. Duncan Hunter is a close second. I am surprised how many suckers want Mitt or that other right wing zealot freak, Huckabee.

[Author]

Posts