- This topic has 345 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by Casca.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 26, 2009 at 9:29 AM #355886February 26, 2009 at 10:30 AM #355355Allan from FallbrookParticipant
Partypup: I agree that we haven’t lost the spark. There is a tendency to forget about the Watts riots (1965) and Detroit riots (1967) and even the River Rouge, MI riot at the Ford plant (1932). All were a result of either economic/social inequality or outright economic disaster (the River Rouge riot took place during the height of the Great Depression).
While people generally refer to Detroit, 1967, as a “riot”, the government was so concerned about the situation that they classified it an “armed insurrection” and responded accordingly, bringing in the National Guard and tanks.
The Watts and Detroit riots also involved a limited slice of the population and occurred in largely segregated (racially speaking) areas.
What happens when the majority of the population rises up? We saw the results in Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, etc during the collapse of communism.
February 26, 2009 at 10:30 AM #355665Allan from FallbrookParticipantPartypup: I agree that we haven’t lost the spark. There is a tendency to forget about the Watts riots (1965) and Detroit riots (1967) and even the River Rouge, MI riot at the Ford plant (1932). All were a result of either economic/social inequality or outright economic disaster (the River Rouge riot took place during the height of the Great Depression).
While people generally refer to Detroit, 1967, as a “riot”, the government was so concerned about the situation that they classified it an “armed insurrection” and responded accordingly, bringing in the National Guard and tanks.
The Watts and Detroit riots also involved a limited slice of the population and occurred in largely segregated (racially speaking) areas.
What happens when the majority of the population rises up? We saw the results in Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, etc during the collapse of communism.
February 26, 2009 at 10:30 AM #355801Allan from FallbrookParticipantPartypup: I agree that we haven’t lost the spark. There is a tendency to forget about the Watts riots (1965) and Detroit riots (1967) and even the River Rouge, MI riot at the Ford plant (1932). All were a result of either economic/social inequality or outright economic disaster (the River Rouge riot took place during the height of the Great Depression).
While people generally refer to Detroit, 1967, as a “riot”, the government was so concerned about the situation that they classified it an “armed insurrection” and responded accordingly, bringing in the National Guard and tanks.
The Watts and Detroit riots also involved a limited slice of the population and occurred in largely segregated (racially speaking) areas.
What happens when the majority of the population rises up? We saw the results in Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, etc during the collapse of communism.
February 26, 2009 at 10:30 AM #355831Allan from FallbrookParticipantPartypup: I agree that we haven’t lost the spark. There is a tendency to forget about the Watts riots (1965) and Detroit riots (1967) and even the River Rouge, MI riot at the Ford plant (1932). All were a result of either economic/social inequality or outright economic disaster (the River Rouge riot took place during the height of the Great Depression).
While people generally refer to Detroit, 1967, as a “riot”, the government was so concerned about the situation that they classified it an “armed insurrection” and responded accordingly, bringing in the National Guard and tanks.
The Watts and Detroit riots also involved a limited slice of the population and occurred in largely segregated (racially speaking) areas.
What happens when the majority of the population rises up? We saw the results in Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, etc during the collapse of communism.
February 26, 2009 at 10:30 AM #355943Allan from FallbrookParticipantPartypup: I agree that we haven’t lost the spark. There is a tendency to forget about the Watts riots (1965) and Detroit riots (1967) and even the River Rouge, MI riot at the Ford plant (1932). All were a result of either economic/social inequality or outright economic disaster (the River Rouge riot took place during the height of the Great Depression).
While people generally refer to Detroit, 1967, as a “riot”, the government was so concerned about the situation that they classified it an “armed insurrection” and responded accordingly, bringing in the National Guard and tanks.
The Watts and Detroit riots also involved a limited slice of the population and occurred in largely segregated (racially speaking) areas.
What happens when the majority of the population rises up? We saw the results in Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, etc during the collapse of communism.
February 26, 2009 at 10:33 AM #355360AecetiaParticipantChange in the air?
“As nightfall does not come all at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there is a twilight. And it is in such twilight that we all must be aware of change in the air, however slight — lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness.”
[Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (1898-1980)]February 26, 2009 at 10:33 AM #355670AecetiaParticipantChange in the air?
“As nightfall does not come all at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there is a twilight. And it is in such twilight that we all must be aware of change in the air, however slight — lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness.”
[Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (1898-1980)]February 26, 2009 at 10:33 AM #355806AecetiaParticipantChange in the air?
“As nightfall does not come all at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there is a twilight. And it is in such twilight that we all must be aware of change in the air, however slight — lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness.”
[Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (1898-1980)]February 26, 2009 at 10:33 AM #355836AecetiaParticipantChange in the air?
“As nightfall does not come all at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there is a twilight. And it is in such twilight that we all must be aware of change in the air, however slight — lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness.”
[Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (1898-1980)]February 26, 2009 at 10:33 AM #355948AecetiaParticipantChange in the air?
“As nightfall does not come all at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there is a twilight. And it is in such twilight that we all must be aware of change in the air, however slight — lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness.”
[Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (1898-1980)]February 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM #355372akbarpunjabiParticipant[quote=paramount]Maybe Breezie is actually marion….[/quote]
I get the feeling Marion left because she found a husband and they purchased a house together. She will be back for advice on whether to walk or signup for a bailout for the house and the husband!
February 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM #355681akbarpunjabiParticipant[quote=paramount]Maybe Breezie is actually marion….[/quote]
I get the feeling Marion left because she found a husband and they purchased a house together. She will be back for advice on whether to walk or signup for a bailout for the house and the husband!
February 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM #355818akbarpunjabiParticipant[quote=paramount]Maybe Breezie is actually marion….[/quote]
I get the feeling Marion left because she found a husband and they purchased a house together. She will be back for advice on whether to walk or signup for a bailout for the house and the husband!
February 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM #355847akbarpunjabiParticipant[quote=paramount]Maybe Breezie is actually marion….[/quote]
I get the feeling Marion left because she found a husband and they purchased a house together. She will be back for advice on whether to walk or signup for a bailout for the house and the husband!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.