- This topic has 1,260 replies, 39 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
ucodegen.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 21, 2009 at 8:40 PM #472872October 21, 2009 at 8:41 PM #472044
sd_matt
Participant[quote=briansd1]Allan, no, I don’t blame conservatives for everything.
“But I do blame conservatives for not living up to their own high moral standards.”
Judge the individual.
“For example sex. I think that adultery is no big deal. It’s something that should be worked-out between the partners involved and it’s none of anyone else’s business. As long at it’s legal, it’s fine by me.”
Elaborate in terms of defining a relationship and how important keeping ones word is. How does this relate to your code of ethics? How does that code of ethics hold a high moral ground?
“But for a conservative politician, who incessantly quotes the Bible, a sex scandal is huge deal. He should resign because he violated his own rules. ”
Yes he should.
“I feel sorry for Mark Sanford. He didn’t do anything morally or legally wrong in my book. If it weren’t for his past moral preachings, he should be allowed to remain in office and continue the affair while in office.”
This depends on how important it is to stick to your own stated values. This is one universal standard we can judge each other by.
October 21, 2009 at 8:41 PM #472224Participant[quote=briansd1]Allan, no, I don’t blame conservatives for everything.
“But I do blame conservatives for not living up to their own high moral standards.”
Judge the individual.
“For example sex. I think that adultery is no big deal. It’s something that should be worked-out between the partners involved and it’s none of anyone else’s business. As long at it’s legal, it’s fine by me.”
Elaborate in terms of defining a relationship and how important keeping ones word is. How does this relate to your code of ethics? How does that code of ethics hold a high moral ground?
“But for a conservative politician, who incessantly quotes the Bible, a sex scandal is huge deal. He should resign because he violated his own rules. ”
Yes he should.
“I feel sorry for Mark Sanford. He didn’t do anything morally or legally wrong in my book. If it weren’t for his past moral preachings, he should be allowed to remain in office and continue the affair while in office.”
This depends on how important it is to stick to your own stated values. This is one universal standard we can judge each other by.
October 21, 2009 at 8:41 PM #472581Participant[quote=briansd1]Allan, no, I don’t blame conservatives for everything.
“But I do blame conservatives for not living up to their own high moral standards.”
Judge the individual.
“For example sex. I think that adultery is no big deal. It’s something that should be worked-out between the partners involved and it’s none of anyone else’s business. As long at it’s legal, it’s fine by me.”
Elaborate in terms of defining a relationship and how important keeping ones word is. How does this relate to your code of ethics? How does that code of ethics hold a high moral ground?
“But for a conservative politician, who incessantly quotes the Bible, a sex scandal is huge deal. He should resign because he violated his own rules. ”
Yes he should.
“I feel sorry for Mark Sanford. He didn’t do anything morally or legally wrong in my book. If it weren’t for his past moral preachings, he should be allowed to remain in office and continue the affair while in office.”
This depends on how important it is to stick to your own stated values. This is one universal standard we can judge each other by.
October 21, 2009 at 8:41 PM #472658Participant[quote=briansd1]Allan, no, I don’t blame conservatives for everything.
“But I do blame conservatives for not living up to their own high moral standards.”
Judge the individual.
“For example sex. I think that adultery is no big deal. It’s something that should be worked-out between the partners involved and it’s none of anyone else’s business. As long at it’s legal, it’s fine by me.”
Elaborate in terms of defining a relationship and how important keeping ones word is. How does this relate to your code of ethics? How does that code of ethics hold a high moral ground?
“But for a conservative politician, who incessantly quotes the Bible, a sex scandal is huge deal. He should resign because he violated his own rules. ”
Yes he should.
“I feel sorry for Mark Sanford. He didn’t do anything morally or legally wrong in my book. If it weren’t for his past moral preachings, he should be allowed to remain in office and continue the affair while in office.”
This depends on how important it is to stick to your own stated values. This is one universal standard we can judge each other by.
October 21, 2009 at 8:41 PM #472877Participant[quote=briansd1]Allan, no, I don’t blame conservatives for everything.
“But I do blame conservatives for not living up to their own high moral standards.”
Judge the individual.
“For example sex. I think that adultery is no big deal. It’s something that should be worked-out between the partners involved and it’s none of anyone else’s business. As long at it’s legal, it’s fine by me.”
Elaborate in terms of defining a relationship and how important keeping ones word is. How does this relate to your code of ethics? How does that code of ethics hold a high moral ground?
“But for a conservative politician, who incessantly quotes the Bible, a sex scandal is huge deal. He should resign because he violated his own rules. ”
Yes he should.
“I feel sorry for Mark Sanford. He didn’t do anything morally or legally wrong in my book. If it weren’t for his past moral preachings, he should be allowed to remain in office and continue the affair while in office.”
This depends on how important it is to stick to your own stated values. This is one universal standard we can judge each other by.
October 21, 2009 at 8:48 PM #472054ParticipantSo some are indeed “more equal than others”
The baby didn’t ask to be brought over to that house. It was brought there. And now it has to play by that houses rules?
October 21, 2009 at 8:48 PM #472234ParticipantSo some are indeed “more equal than others”
The baby didn’t ask to be brought over to that house. It was brought there. And now it has to play by that houses rules?
October 21, 2009 at 8:48 PM #472592ParticipantSo some are indeed “more equal than others”
The baby didn’t ask to be brought over to that house. It was brought there. And now it has to play by that houses rules?
October 21, 2009 at 8:48 PM #472668ParticipantSo some are indeed “more equal than others”
The baby didn’t ask to be brought over to that house. It was brought there. And now it has to play by that houses rules?
October 21, 2009 at 8:48 PM #472887ParticipantSo some are indeed “more equal than others”
The baby didn’t ask to be brought over to that house. It was brought there. And now it has to play by that houses rules?
October 21, 2009 at 8:52 PM #472064briansd1
GuestAbout Paula Jones, it was about sex also.
Bill Clinton settled with her.
As part of her suit, Paula Jones tried to demonstrate that the president had a pattern of sexual conduct with other women. So they asked about Monica Lewinski.
Clinton allegedly lied about Monica, hence the perjury charges.
Technically, he didn’t lie because there are no sexual intercourse, hence no sex.
Congress should have left this as a business between Paula Jones and Bill Clinton.
But anyway, the Clinton affair was a decade ago. We should talk about current events.
Hitler, Clinton, Hitler, Clinton, Kennedy, Clinton, Kennedy, Carter. Always the same cast of characters with the right. Can’t you get over those guys and move on?
October 21, 2009 at 8:52 PM #472244GuestAbout Paula Jones, it was about sex also.
Bill Clinton settled with her.
As part of her suit, Paula Jones tried to demonstrate that the president had a pattern of sexual conduct with other women. So they asked about Monica Lewinski.
Clinton allegedly lied about Monica, hence the perjury charges.
Technically, he didn’t lie because there are no sexual intercourse, hence no sex.
Congress should have left this as a business between Paula Jones and Bill Clinton.
But anyway, the Clinton affair was a decade ago. We should talk about current events.
Hitler, Clinton, Hitler, Clinton, Kennedy, Clinton, Kennedy, Carter. Always the same cast of characters with the right. Can’t you get over those guys and move on?
October 21, 2009 at 8:52 PM #472602GuestAbout Paula Jones, it was about sex also.
Bill Clinton settled with her.
As part of her suit, Paula Jones tried to demonstrate that the president had a pattern of sexual conduct with other women. So they asked about Monica Lewinski.
Clinton allegedly lied about Monica, hence the perjury charges.
Technically, he didn’t lie because there are no sexual intercourse, hence no sex.
Congress should have left this as a business between Paula Jones and Bill Clinton.
But anyway, the Clinton affair was a decade ago. We should talk about current events.
Hitler, Clinton, Hitler, Clinton, Kennedy, Clinton, Kennedy, Carter. Always the same cast of characters with the right. Can’t you get over those guys and move on?
October 21, 2009 at 8:52 PM #472678GuestAbout Paula Jones, it was about sex also.
Bill Clinton settled with her.
As part of her suit, Paula Jones tried to demonstrate that the president had a pattern of sexual conduct with other women. So they asked about Monica Lewinski.
Clinton allegedly lied about Monica, hence the perjury charges.
Technically, he didn’t lie because there are no sexual intercourse, hence no sex.
Congress should have left this as a business between Paula Jones and Bill Clinton.
But anyway, the Clinton affair was a decade ago. We should talk about current events.
Hitler, Clinton, Hitler, Clinton, Kennedy, Clinton, Kennedy, Carter. Always the same cast of characters with the right. Can’t you get over those guys and move on?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.