- This topic has 1,260 replies, 39 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by ucodegen.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 13, 2009 at 5:19 PM #469195October 13, 2009 at 5:23 PM #468372briansd1Guest
[quote=Arraya]
They were blaming him for the economy before he took office, what do you want.[/quote]
hahahaha.. LOL.
October 13, 2009 at 5:23 PM #468555briansd1Guest[quote=Arraya]
They were blaming him for the economy before he took office, what do you want.[/quote]
hahahaha.. LOL.
October 13, 2009 at 5:23 PM #468915briansd1Guest[quote=Arraya]
They were blaming him for the economy before he took office, what do you want.[/quote]
hahahaha.. LOL.
October 13, 2009 at 5:23 PM #468987briansd1Guest[quote=Arraya]
They were blaming him for the economy before he took office, what do you want.[/quote]
hahahaha.. LOL.
October 13, 2009 at 5:23 PM #469200briansd1Guest[quote=Arraya]
They were blaming him for the economy before he took office, what do you want.[/quote]
hahahaha.. LOL.
October 13, 2009 at 5:26 PM #468377CricketOnTheHearthParticipant“…Losses of $55 billion just on mortgage servicing. In just the 4 biggest banks. Sounds promising, doesn’t it? But they’ll survive, no matter what their losses. Too big to fail and all that.
Sorry, Joe Blow, but the peace prize winner deems it necessary that you, who can’t afford a home anymore or get a loan to buy one, fork over for those who can.”
If this meme makes it onto the street in any kind of a big way he is toast.
“…Supporting homeowners is of course not a bad thing in itself, But if you pay attention, you can see that’s not what the government is doing. It’s supporting the banks on Tim Geithner’s speed-dial instead, under the guise of homeowner support, and all the losses will be transferred to you, while most owners will lose their property and/or equity regardless.”
Owtch!!
October 13, 2009 at 5:26 PM #468560CricketOnTheHearthParticipant“…Losses of $55 billion just on mortgage servicing. In just the 4 biggest banks. Sounds promising, doesn’t it? But they’ll survive, no matter what their losses. Too big to fail and all that.
Sorry, Joe Blow, but the peace prize winner deems it necessary that you, who can’t afford a home anymore or get a loan to buy one, fork over for those who can.”
If this meme makes it onto the street in any kind of a big way he is toast.
“…Supporting homeowners is of course not a bad thing in itself, But if you pay attention, you can see that’s not what the government is doing. It’s supporting the banks on Tim Geithner’s speed-dial instead, under the guise of homeowner support, and all the losses will be transferred to you, while most owners will lose their property and/or equity regardless.”
Owtch!!
October 13, 2009 at 5:26 PM #468920CricketOnTheHearthParticipant“…Losses of $55 billion just on mortgage servicing. In just the 4 biggest banks. Sounds promising, doesn’t it? But they’ll survive, no matter what their losses. Too big to fail and all that.
Sorry, Joe Blow, but the peace prize winner deems it necessary that you, who can’t afford a home anymore or get a loan to buy one, fork over for those who can.”
If this meme makes it onto the street in any kind of a big way he is toast.
“…Supporting homeowners is of course not a bad thing in itself, But if you pay attention, you can see that’s not what the government is doing. It’s supporting the banks on Tim Geithner’s speed-dial instead, under the guise of homeowner support, and all the losses will be transferred to you, while most owners will lose their property and/or equity regardless.”
Owtch!!
October 13, 2009 at 5:26 PM #468992CricketOnTheHearthParticipant“…Losses of $55 billion just on mortgage servicing. In just the 4 biggest banks. Sounds promising, doesn’t it? But they’ll survive, no matter what their losses. Too big to fail and all that.
Sorry, Joe Blow, but the peace prize winner deems it necessary that you, who can’t afford a home anymore or get a loan to buy one, fork over for those who can.”
If this meme makes it onto the street in any kind of a big way he is toast.
“…Supporting homeowners is of course not a bad thing in itself, But if you pay attention, you can see that’s not what the government is doing. It’s supporting the banks on Tim Geithner’s speed-dial instead, under the guise of homeowner support, and all the losses will be transferred to you, while most owners will lose their property and/or equity regardless.”
Owtch!!
October 13, 2009 at 5:26 PM #469205CricketOnTheHearthParticipant“…Losses of $55 billion just on mortgage servicing. In just the 4 biggest banks. Sounds promising, doesn’t it? But they’ll survive, no matter what their losses. Too big to fail and all that.
Sorry, Joe Blow, but the peace prize winner deems it necessary that you, who can’t afford a home anymore or get a loan to buy one, fork over for those who can.”
If this meme makes it onto the street in any kind of a big way he is toast.
“…Supporting homeowners is of course not a bad thing in itself, But if you pay attention, you can see that’s not what the government is doing. It’s supporting the banks on Tim Geithner’s speed-dial instead, under the guise of homeowner support, and all the losses will be transferred to you, while most owners will lose their property and/or equity regardless.”
Owtch!!
October 13, 2009 at 5:29 PM #468382sd_mattParticipantYes a great deal for them indeed. And they are becoming a bunch of ungrateful brats.
Regarding war it would behoove you to read about what has happened in the past when post-war countries were left in the state of a power vacuum.
Also I personally never would have gone into Iraq. But to open that can of worms without closing it is big-time unethical. Finish what you start.
Back to my previous post. You don’t seem to want to address whether or not the far left and far right think the same. Hmmmmm….
October 13, 2009 at 5:29 PM #468566sd_mattParticipantYes a great deal for them indeed. And they are becoming a bunch of ungrateful brats.
Regarding war it would behoove you to read about what has happened in the past when post-war countries were left in the state of a power vacuum.
Also I personally never would have gone into Iraq. But to open that can of worms without closing it is big-time unethical. Finish what you start.
Back to my previous post. You don’t seem to want to address whether or not the far left and far right think the same. Hmmmmm….
October 13, 2009 at 5:29 PM #468925sd_mattParticipantYes a great deal for them indeed. And they are becoming a bunch of ungrateful brats.
Regarding war it would behoove you to read about what has happened in the past when post-war countries were left in the state of a power vacuum.
Also I personally never would have gone into Iraq. But to open that can of worms without closing it is big-time unethical. Finish what you start.
Back to my previous post. You don’t seem to want to address whether or not the far left and far right think the same. Hmmmmm….
October 13, 2009 at 5:29 PM #468997sd_mattParticipantYes a great deal for them indeed. And they are becoming a bunch of ungrateful brats.
Regarding war it would behoove you to read about what has happened in the past when post-war countries were left in the state of a power vacuum.
Also I personally never would have gone into Iraq. But to open that can of worms without closing it is big-time unethical. Finish what you start.
Back to my previous post. You don’t seem to want to address whether or not the far left and far right think the same. Hmmmmm….
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.