- This topic has 186 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 9 months ago by kcal09.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 9, 2011 at 10:00 PM #686348April 10, 2011 at 8:10 AM #685197SD RealtorParticipant
I would agree with what Scarlett said. I would be more comfortable with the 1750 sf homes down lower then where they are now. At the 500k price they are horrible investment properties. Most of those that were bought for investments were done so long ago. The majority were owner occupied and bought at a low price and then the owners moved on but kept the unit. I am not sure how low they will go because it is a nice area that has decent demand. I do believe they will move down though.
April 10, 2011 at 8:10 AM #685248SD RealtorParticipantI would agree with what Scarlett said. I would be more comfortable with the 1750 sf homes down lower then where they are now. At the 500k price they are horrible investment properties. Most of those that were bought for investments were done so long ago. The majority were owner occupied and bought at a low price and then the owners moved on but kept the unit. I am not sure how low they will go because it is a nice area that has decent demand. I do believe they will move down though.
April 10, 2011 at 8:10 AM #685874SD RealtorParticipantI would agree with what Scarlett said. I would be more comfortable with the 1750 sf homes down lower then where they are now. At the 500k price they are horrible investment properties. Most of those that were bought for investments were done so long ago. The majority were owner occupied and bought at a low price and then the owners moved on but kept the unit. I am not sure how low they will go because it is a nice area that has decent demand. I do believe they will move down though.
April 10, 2011 at 8:10 AM #686016SD RealtorParticipantI would agree with what Scarlett said. I would be more comfortable with the 1750 sf homes down lower then where they are now. At the 500k price they are horrible investment properties. Most of those that were bought for investments were done so long ago. The majority were owner occupied and bought at a low price and then the owners moved on but kept the unit. I am not sure how low they will go because it is a nice area that has decent demand. I do believe they will move down though.
April 10, 2011 at 8:10 AM #686368SD RealtorParticipantI would agree with what Scarlett said. I would be more comfortable with the 1750 sf homes down lower then where they are now. At the 500k price they are horrible investment properties. Most of those that were bought for investments were done so long ago. The majority were owner occupied and bought at a low price and then the owners moved on but kept the unit. I am not sure how low they will go because it is a nice area that has decent demand. I do believe they will move down though.
April 10, 2011 at 6:33 PM #685232permabearParticipantScripps is a fantastic area (I live here) but the rental/landlord prices don’t pencil in at current levels, pretty much across the board.
There are some properties in Rancho Penasquitos that do.
If you check Craigslist/etc, rentals are pretty much stuck in the $1900-2500/mo range across the board, regardless of whether your place is a 1300 sq ft condo or a 2500 sq ft house. Seriously, it’s weird.
April 10, 2011 at 6:33 PM #685283permabearParticipantScripps is a fantastic area (I live here) but the rental/landlord prices don’t pencil in at current levels, pretty much across the board.
There are some properties in Rancho Penasquitos that do.
If you check Craigslist/etc, rentals are pretty much stuck in the $1900-2500/mo range across the board, regardless of whether your place is a 1300 sq ft condo or a 2500 sq ft house. Seriously, it’s weird.
April 10, 2011 at 6:33 PM #685909permabearParticipantScripps is a fantastic area (I live here) but the rental/landlord prices don’t pencil in at current levels, pretty much across the board.
There are some properties in Rancho Penasquitos that do.
If you check Craigslist/etc, rentals are pretty much stuck in the $1900-2500/mo range across the board, regardless of whether your place is a 1300 sq ft condo or a 2500 sq ft house. Seriously, it’s weird.
April 10, 2011 at 6:33 PM #686051permabearParticipantScripps is a fantastic area (I live here) but the rental/landlord prices don’t pencil in at current levels, pretty much across the board.
There are some properties in Rancho Penasquitos that do.
If you check Craigslist/etc, rentals are pretty much stuck in the $1900-2500/mo range across the board, regardless of whether your place is a 1300 sq ft condo or a 2500 sq ft house. Seriously, it’s weird.
April 10, 2011 at 6:33 PM #686403permabearParticipantScripps is a fantastic area (I live here) but the rental/landlord prices don’t pencil in at current levels, pretty much across the board.
There are some properties in Rancho Penasquitos that do.
If you check Craigslist/etc, rentals are pretty much stuck in the $1900-2500/mo range across the board, regardless of whether your place is a 1300 sq ft condo or a 2500 sq ft house. Seriously, it’s weird.
April 11, 2011 at 10:30 AM #685302kcal09ParticipantAt the current price levels there is not much buying interest and the question is if the seller is willing to compromise on the price. As far as I’m concerned I’m planning to keep the property for at least 10 years.
April 11, 2011 at 10:30 AM #685353kcal09ParticipantAt the current price levels there is not much buying interest and the question is if the seller is willing to compromise on the price. As far as I’m concerned I’m planning to keep the property for at least 10 years.
April 11, 2011 at 10:30 AM #685979kcal09ParticipantAt the current price levels there is not much buying interest and the question is if the seller is willing to compromise on the price. As far as I’m concerned I’m planning to keep the property for at least 10 years.
April 11, 2011 at 10:30 AM #686121kcal09ParticipantAt the current price levels there is not much buying interest and the question is if the seller is willing to compromise on the price. As far as I’m concerned I’m planning to keep the property for at least 10 years.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.