- This topic has 935 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 12 months ago by bearishgurl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 30, 2010 at 11:40 AM #574867June 30, 2010 at 12:06 PM #573863sdrealtorParticipant
You are right the bank might have put it on the market for 535K but they would have added new paint and carpet also to maximize thir return. The buyers would bid on it and it would sell for market value regardless of what it was priced at whichy in this case would be the 615K.
As a sidebar, I have been seeing lots of REO’s and short sales that were intially listed under market closing at prices 10 to 20% above th asking price. The market speaks volumes but some folks dont care to read what the market is telling them.
June 30, 2010 at 12:06 PM #573960sdrealtorParticipantYou are right the bank might have put it on the market for 535K but they would have added new paint and carpet also to maximize thir return. The buyers would bid on it and it would sell for market value regardless of what it was priced at whichy in this case would be the 615K.
As a sidebar, I have been seeing lots of REO’s and short sales that were intially listed under market closing at prices 10 to 20% above th asking price. The market speaks volumes but some folks dont care to read what the market is telling them.
June 30, 2010 at 12:06 PM #574483sdrealtorParticipantYou are right the bank might have put it on the market for 535K but they would have added new paint and carpet also to maximize thir return. The buyers would bid on it and it would sell for market value regardless of what it was priced at whichy in this case would be the 615K.
As a sidebar, I have been seeing lots of REO’s and short sales that were intially listed under market closing at prices 10 to 20% above th asking price. The market speaks volumes but some folks dont care to read what the market is telling them.
June 30, 2010 at 12:06 PM #574589sdrealtorParticipantYou are right the bank might have put it on the market for 535K but they would have added new paint and carpet also to maximize thir return. The buyers would bid on it and it would sell for market value regardless of what it was priced at whichy in this case would be the 615K.
As a sidebar, I have been seeing lots of REO’s and short sales that were intially listed under market closing at prices 10 to 20% above th asking price. The market speaks volumes but some folks dont care to read what the market is telling them.
June 30, 2010 at 12:06 PM #574887sdrealtorParticipantYou are right the bank might have put it on the market for 535K but they would have added new paint and carpet also to maximize thir return. The buyers would bid on it and it would sell for market value regardless of what it was priced at whichy in this case would be the 615K.
As a sidebar, I have been seeing lots of REO’s and short sales that were intially listed under market closing at prices 10 to 20% above th asking price. The market speaks volumes but some folks dont care to read what the market is telling them.
June 30, 2010 at 12:10 PM #573868jpinpbParticipantsdr – what makes you think the bank will put new paint and carpet? And if there were no government credits, what makes you think it’ll sell for 615k. Heck, it may have sold for lower than 535k.
I guess we are both making assumptions. I’m not laying all the blame on flippers, so don’t get me wrong. There are many factors at work here. Flippers just aren’t helping. And since they had a hand during the bubble, they are doing it again.
June 30, 2010 at 12:10 PM #573965jpinpbParticipantsdr – what makes you think the bank will put new paint and carpet? And if there were no government credits, what makes you think it’ll sell for 615k. Heck, it may have sold for lower than 535k.
I guess we are both making assumptions. I’m not laying all the blame on flippers, so don’t get me wrong. There are many factors at work here. Flippers just aren’t helping. And since they had a hand during the bubble, they are doing it again.
June 30, 2010 at 12:10 PM #574488jpinpbParticipantsdr – what makes you think the bank will put new paint and carpet? And if there were no government credits, what makes you think it’ll sell for 615k. Heck, it may have sold for lower than 535k.
I guess we are both making assumptions. I’m not laying all the blame on flippers, so don’t get me wrong. There are many factors at work here. Flippers just aren’t helping. And since they had a hand during the bubble, they are doing it again.
June 30, 2010 at 12:10 PM #574594jpinpbParticipantsdr – what makes you think the bank will put new paint and carpet? And if there were no government credits, what makes you think it’ll sell for 615k. Heck, it may have sold for lower than 535k.
I guess we are both making assumptions. I’m not laying all the blame on flippers, so don’t get me wrong. There are many factors at work here. Flippers just aren’t helping. And since they had a hand during the bubble, they are doing it again.
June 30, 2010 at 12:10 PM #574892jpinpbParticipantsdr – what makes you think the bank will put new paint and carpet? And if there were no government credits, what makes you think it’ll sell for 615k. Heck, it may have sold for lower than 535k.
I guess we are both making assumptions. I’m not laying all the blame on flippers, so don’t get me wrong. There are many factors at work here. Flippers just aren’t helping. And since they had a hand during the bubble, they are doing it again.
June 30, 2010 at 12:14 PM #573873sdrealtorParticipantBTW, I checked the listing on Driscoll and as a short sale it was contingent multiple times above 600K so apparaently they had no problem getting offer in that range before it went back to the bank. They just couldnt get the short sale done so it went back to the bank.
Additionally I have spent the last couple weeks showing properties in 92117. That house would have a couple dozen offers if it was listed at 535K.
June 30, 2010 at 12:14 PM #573970sdrealtorParticipantBTW, I checked the listing on Driscoll and as a short sale it was contingent multiple times above 600K so apparaently they had no problem getting offer in that range before it went back to the bank. They just couldnt get the short sale done so it went back to the bank.
Additionally I have spent the last couple weeks showing properties in 92117. That house would have a couple dozen offers if it was listed at 535K.
June 30, 2010 at 12:14 PM #574493sdrealtorParticipantBTW, I checked the listing on Driscoll and as a short sale it was contingent multiple times above 600K so apparaently they had no problem getting offer in that range before it went back to the bank. They just couldnt get the short sale done so it went back to the bank.
Additionally I have spent the last couple weeks showing properties in 92117. That house would have a couple dozen offers if it was listed at 535K.
June 30, 2010 at 12:14 PM #574599sdrealtorParticipantBTW, I checked the listing on Driscoll and as a short sale it was contingent multiple times above 600K so apparaently they had no problem getting offer in that range before it went back to the bank. They just couldnt get the short sale done so it went back to the bank.
Additionally I have spent the last couple weeks showing properties in 92117. That house would have a couple dozen offers if it was listed at 535K.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.