- This topic has 935 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by
bearishgurl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 30, 2010 at 11:40 AM #574867June 30, 2010 at 12:06 PM #573863
sdrealtor
ParticipantYou are right the bank might have put it on the market for 535K but they would have added new paint and carpet also to maximize thir return. The buyers would bid on it and it would sell for market value regardless of what it was priced at whichy in this case would be the 615K.
As a sidebar, I have been seeing lots of REO’s and short sales that were intially listed under market closing at prices 10 to 20% above th asking price. The market speaks volumes but some folks dont care to read what the market is telling them.
June 30, 2010 at 12:06 PM #573960sdrealtor
ParticipantYou are right the bank might have put it on the market for 535K but they would have added new paint and carpet also to maximize thir return. The buyers would bid on it and it would sell for market value regardless of what it was priced at whichy in this case would be the 615K.
As a sidebar, I have been seeing lots of REO’s and short sales that were intially listed under market closing at prices 10 to 20% above th asking price. The market speaks volumes but some folks dont care to read what the market is telling them.
June 30, 2010 at 12:06 PM #574483sdrealtor
ParticipantYou are right the bank might have put it on the market for 535K but they would have added new paint and carpet also to maximize thir return. The buyers would bid on it and it would sell for market value regardless of what it was priced at whichy in this case would be the 615K.
As a sidebar, I have been seeing lots of REO’s and short sales that were intially listed under market closing at prices 10 to 20% above th asking price. The market speaks volumes but some folks dont care to read what the market is telling them.
June 30, 2010 at 12:06 PM #574589sdrealtor
ParticipantYou are right the bank might have put it on the market for 535K but they would have added new paint and carpet also to maximize thir return. The buyers would bid on it and it would sell for market value regardless of what it was priced at whichy in this case would be the 615K.
As a sidebar, I have been seeing lots of REO’s and short sales that were intially listed under market closing at prices 10 to 20% above th asking price. The market speaks volumes but some folks dont care to read what the market is telling them.
June 30, 2010 at 12:06 PM #574887sdrealtor
ParticipantYou are right the bank might have put it on the market for 535K but they would have added new paint and carpet also to maximize thir return. The buyers would bid on it and it would sell for market value regardless of what it was priced at whichy in this case would be the 615K.
As a sidebar, I have been seeing lots of REO’s and short sales that were intially listed under market closing at prices 10 to 20% above th asking price. The market speaks volumes but some folks dont care to read what the market is telling them.
June 30, 2010 at 12:10 PM #573868jpinpb
Participantsdr – what makes you think the bank will put new paint and carpet? And if there were no government credits, what makes you think it’ll sell for 615k. Heck, it may have sold for lower than 535k.
I guess we are both making assumptions. I’m not laying all the blame on flippers, so don’t get me wrong. There are many factors at work here. Flippers just aren’t helping. And since they had a hand during the bubble, they are doing it again.
June 30, 2010 at 12:10 PM #573965jpinpb
Participantsdr – what makes you think the bank will put new paint and carpet? And if there were no government credits, what makes you think it’ll sell for 615k. Heck, it may have sold for lower than 535k.
I guess we are both making assumptions. I’m not laying all the blame on flippers, so don’t get me wrong. There are many factors at work here. Flippers just aren’t helping. And since they had a hand during the bubble, they are doing it again.
June 30, 2010 at 12:10 PM #574488jpinpb
Participantsdr – what makes you think the bank will put new paint and carpet? And if there were no government credits, what makes you think it’ll sell for 615k. Heck, it may have sold for lower than 535k.
I guess we are both making assumptions. I’m not laying all the blame on flippers, so don’t get me wrong. There are many factors at work here. Flippers just aren’t helping. And since they had a hand during the bubble, they are doing it again.
June 30, 2010 at 12:10 PM #574594jpinpb
Participantsdr – what makes you think the bank will put new paint and carpet? And if there were no government credits, what makes you think it’ll sell for 615k. Heck, it may have sold for lower than 535k.
I guess we are both making assumptions. I’m not laying all the blame on flippers, so don’t get me wrong. There are many factors at work here. Flippers just aren’t helping. And since they had a hand during the bubble, they are doing it again.
June 30, 2010 at 12:10 PM #574892jpinpb
Participantsdr – what makes you think the bank will put new paint and carpet? And if there were no government credits, what makes you think it’ll sell for 615k. Heck, it may have sold for lower than 535k.
I guess we are both making assumptions. I’m not laying all the blame on flippers, so don’t get me wrong. There are many factors at work here. Flippers just aren’t helping. And since they had a hand during the bubble, they are doing it again.
June 30, 2010 at 12:14 PM #573873sdrealtor
ParticipantBTW, I checked the listing on Driscoll and as a short sale it was contingent multiple times above 600K so apparaently they had no problem getting offer in that range before it went back to the bank. They just couldnt get the short sale done so it went back to the bank.
Additionally I have spent the last couple weeks showing properties in 92117. That house would have a couple dozen offers if it was listed at 535K.
June 30, 2010 at 12:14 PM #573970sdrealtor
ParticipantBTW, I checked the listing on Driscoll and as a short sale it was contingent multiple times above 600K so apparaently they had no problem getting offer in that range before it went back to the bank. They just couldnt get the short sale done so it went back to the bank.
Additionally I have spent the last couple weeks showing properties in 92117. That house would have a couple dozen offers if it was listed at 535K.
June 30, 2010 at 12:14 PM #574493sdrealtor
ParticipantBTW, I checked the listing on Driscoll and as a short sale it was contingent multiple times above 600K so apparaently they had no problem getting offer in that range before it went back to the bank. They just couldnt get the short sale done so it went back to the bank.
Additionally I have spent the last couple weeks showing properties in 92117. That house would have a couple dozen offers if it was listed at 535K.
June 30, 2010 at 12:14 PM #574599sdrealtor
ParticipantBTW, I checked the listing on Driscoll and as a short sale it was contingent multiple times above 600K so apparaently they had no problem getting offer in that range before it went back to the bank. They just couldnt get the short sale done so it went back to the bank.
Additionally I have spent the last couple weeks showing properties in 92117. That house would have a couple dozen offers if it was listed at 535K.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
