Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › North Park
- This topic has 170 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by
Reality.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 19, 2009 at 9:19 AM #447152August 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM #446373
blahblahblah
ParticipantThis is a very nice 60K-80K house in many parts of the country, that would rent for $500-$600 a month.
I think the rent here for that place would be more than $1000/mo. They still overpaid in this case, people probably always will in certain neighborhoods.
August 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM #446567blahblahblah
ParticipantThis is a very nice 60K-80K house in many parts of the country, that would rent for $500-$600 a month.
I think the rent here for that place would be more than $1000/mo. They still overpaid in this case, people probably always will in certain neighborhoods.
August 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM #446904blahblahblah
ParticipantThis is a very nice 60K-80K house in many parts of the country, that would rent for $500-$600 a month.
I think the rent here for that place would be more than $1000/mo. They still overpaid in this case, people probably always will in certain neighborhoods.
August 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM #446976blahblahblah
ParticipantThis is a very nice 60K-80K house in many parts of the country, that would rent for $500-$600 a month.
I think the rent here for that place would be more than $1000/mo. They still overpaid in this case, people probably always will in certain neighborhoods.
August 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM #447157blahblahblah
ParticipantThis is a very nice 60K-80K house in many parts of the country, that would rent for $500-$600 a month.
I think the rent here for that place would be more than $1000/mo. They still overpaid in this case, people probably always will in certain neighborhoods.
August 19, 2009 at 9:38 AM #446388HLS
ParticipantIn the 1980’s, houses that rented for $1000 a month sold for $125,000 +/-,,,,and there wasn’t any shortage of them. What has changed other than foolishness and govt manipulation ??
I was so impressed that this house actually had room for a STACKED washer and dryer. Need to throw out the side by side…they failed to mention that with bunkbeds you this would be comfy for 6-10 occupants.
Was this a 3.50% down FHA buyer ???
Or did someone actually fork over the cash with 20% down that could have bought them a house free and clear elsewhere…August 19, 2009 at 9:38 AM #446582HLS
ParticipantIn the 1980’s, houses that rented for $1000 a month sold for $125,000 +/-,,,,and there wasn’t any shortage of them. What has changed other than foolishness and govt manipulation ??
I was so impressed that this house actually had room for a STACKED washer and dryer. Need to throw out the side by side…they failed to mention that with bunkbeds you this would be comfy for 6-10 occupants.
Was this a 3.50% down FHA buyer ???
Or did someone actually fork over the cash with 20% down that could have bought them a house free and clear elsewhere…August 19, 2009 at 9:38 AM #446919HLS
ParticipantIn the 1980’s, houses that rented for $1000 a month sold for $125,000 +/-,,,,and there wasn’t any shortage of them. What has changed other than foolishness and govt manipulation ??
I was so impressed that this house actually had room for a STACKED washer and dryer. Need to throw out the side by side…they failed to mention that with bunkbeds you this would be comfy for 6-10 occupants.
Was this a 3.50% down FHA buyer ???
Or did someone actually fork over the cash with 20% down that could have bought them a house free and clear elsewhere…August 19, 2009 at 9:38 AM #446991HLS
ParticipantIn the 1980’s, houses that rented for $1000 a month sold for $125,000 +/-,,,,and there wasn’t any shortage of them. What has changed other than foolishness and govt manipulation ??
I was so impressed that this house actually had room for a STACKED washer and dryer. Need to throw out the side by side…they failed to mention that with bunkbeds you this would be comfy for 6-10 occupants.
Was this a 3.50% down FHA buyer ???
Or did someone actually fork over the cash with 20% down that could have bought them a house free and clear elsewhere…August 19, 2009 at 9:38 AM #447172HLS
ParticipantIn the 1980’s, houses that rented for $1000 a month sold for $125,000 +/-,,,,and there wasn’t any shortage of them. What has changed other than foolishness and govt manipulation ??
I was so impressed that this house actually had room for a STACKED washer and dryer. Need to throw out the side by side…they failed to mention that with bunkbeds you this would be comfy for 6-10 occupants.
Was this a 3.50% down FHA buyer ???
Or did someone actually fork over the cash with 20% down that could have bought them a house free and clear elsewhere…August 19, 2009 at 9:55 AM #446398jpinpb
ParticipantI wouldn’t do it. But it’s close to the Market Overview. But I have been seeing a few of these kind of sales lately.
As HLS said, I think there is a little pressure on some buyers b/c they want the 8k incentive before it runs out and many people qualify under 500k, particular FHA, and b/c media is somewhat painting a better picture of things being bottom. Many are falling under that mentality that they are going to get priced out again.
All the money the government has spent has succeeded at least for now to stablize prices somewhat, rather than a freefall.
Now last night I just went through a list of NODs in over 10 ZIPs. There doesn’t seem to be much let-up. My question: What’s going to happen to all the NODs? Will they ALL get modified? Will the banks let them squat for years until we get back to peak? Will the government give more money so as to absorb the losses so banks can foreclose?
Mish – Wave of foreclosure seems to suggest really 5 states are the worst performing re markets. How long can the rest of the country shell out money for 5 states?
August 19, 2009 at 9:55 AM #446591jpinpb
ParticipantI wouldn’t do it. But it’s close to the Market Overview. But I have been seeing a few of these kind of sales lately.
As HLS said, I think there is a little pressure on some buyers b/c they want the 8k incentive before it runs out and many people qualify under 500k, particular FHA, and b/c media is somewhat painting a better picture of things being bottom. Many are falling under that mentality that they are going to get priced out again.
All the money the government has spent has succeeded at least for now to stablize prices somewhat, rather than a freefall.
Now last night I just went through a list of NODs in over 10 ZIPs. There doesn’t seem to be much let-up. My question: What’s going to happen to all the NODs? Will they ALL get modified? Will the banks let them squat for years until we get back to peak? Will the government give more money so as to absorb the losses so banks can foreclose?
Mish – Wave of foreclosure seems to suggest really 5 states are the worst performing re markets. How long can the rest of the country shell out money for 5 states?
August 19, 2009 at 9:55 AM #446929jpinpb
ParticipantI wouldn’t do it. But it’s close to the Market Overview. But I have been seeing a few of these kind of sales lately.
As HLS said, I think there is a little pressure on some buyers b/c they want the 8k incentive before it runs out and many people qualify under 500k, particular FHA, and b/c media is somewhat painting a better picture of things being bottom. Many are falling under that mentality that they are going to get priced out again.
All the money the government has spent has succeeded at least for now to stablize prices somewhat, rather than a freefall.
Now last night I just went through a list of NODs in over 10 ZIPs. There doesn’t seem to be much let-up. My question: What’s going to happen to all the NODs? Will they ALL get modified? Will the banks let them squat for years until we get back to peak? Will the government give more money so as to absorb the losses so banks can foreclose?
Mish – Wave of foreclosure seems to suggest really 5 states are the worst performing re markets. How long can the rest of the country shell out money for 5 states?
August 19, 2009 at 9:55 AM #447001jpinpb
ParticipantI wouldn’t do it. But it’s close to the Market Overview. But I have been seeing a few of these kind of sales lately.
As HLS said, I think there is a little pressure on some buyers b/c they want the 8k incentive before it runs out and many people qualify under 500k, particular FHA, and b/c media is somewhat painting a better picture of things being bottom. Many are falling under that mentality that they are going to get priced out again.
All the money the government has spent has succeeded at least for now to stablize prices somewhat, rather than a freefall.
Now last night I just went through a list of NODs in over 10 ZIPs. There doesn’t seem to be much let-up. My question: What’s going to happen to all the NODs? Will they ALL get modified? Will the banks let them squat for years until we get back to peak? Will the government give more money so as to absorb the losses so banks can foreclose?
Mish – Wave of foreclosure seems to suggest really 5 states are the worst performing re markets. How long can the rest of the country shell out money for 5 states?
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.