- This topic has 195 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 31, 2008 at 10:16 AM #214799May 31, 2008 at 10:31 AM #214660SD RealtorParticipant
Well I would agree there is alot of cheerleading in the industry, that is sure the truth. I don’t think any of the regular realtors who post here fall into that category though. Yeah we get the trolls who divebomb in from time to time.
Before bed last night I went into the Realist search and did the foreclosure search within Realist. Indeed 84 properties did come up in Carmel Valley. I did not parse through them individually to to figure out attached verses detached but I know Jim’s work is accurate and I do read his posts. While not all of these distressed properties are on the market it is more then likely that most of them will be eventually. I find that there is a high rate of recidivism for people who fall behind in mortgage payments.
Again, my read is that CV is doing what CV should do. Similarly the properties that get priced even a tad aggressively seem to get scooped up pretty quick. There is no argument that even those that get scooped up have depreciated so that is an encouraging trend to see. So in short it will happen, or shall we say, it IS happening and it will continue to do so. More raindrops will come in the form of more distressed properties and in a few years we will be able to look back and hopefully find some big 20-30% numbers off of CV.
SD Realtor
May 31, 2008 at 10:31 AM #214738SD RealtorParticipantWell I would agree there is alot of cheerleading in the industry, that is sure the truth. I don’t think any of the regular realtors who post here fall into that category though. Yeah we get the trolls who divebomb in from time to time.
Before bed last night I went into the Realist search and did the foreclosure search within Realist. Indeed 84 properties did come up in Carmel Valley. I did not parse through them individually to to figure out attached verses detached but I know Jim’s work is accurate and I do read his posts. While not all of these distressed properties are on the market it is more then likely that most of them will be eventually. I find that there is a high rate of recidivism for people who fall behind in mortgage payments.
Again, my read is that CV is doing what CV should do. Similarly the properties that get priced even a tad aggressively seem to get scooped up pretty quick. There is no argument that even those that get scooped up have depreciated so that is an encouraging trend to see. So in short it will happen, or shall we say, it IS happening and it will continue to do so. More raindrops will come in the form of more distressed properties and in a few years we will be able to look back and hopefully find some big 20-30% numbers off of CV.
SD Realtor
May 31, 2008 at 10:31 AM #214761SD RealtorParticipantWell I would agree there is alot of cheerleading in the industry, that is sure the truth. I don’t think any of the regular realtors who post here fall into that category though. Yeah we get the trolls who divebomb in from time to time.
Before bed last night I went into the Realist search and did the foreclosure search within Realist. Indeed 84 properties did come up in Carmel Valley. I did not parse through them individually to to figure out attached verses detached but I know Jim’s work is accurate and I do read his posts. While not all of these distressed properties are on the market it is more then likely that most of them will be eventually. I find that there is a high rate of recidivism for people who fall behind in mortgage payments.
Again, my read is that CV is doing what CV should do. Similarly the properties that get priced even a tad aggressively seem to get scooped up pretty quick. There is no argument that even those that get scooped up have depreciated so that is an encouraging trend to see. So in short it will happen, or shall we say, it IS happening and it will continue to do so. More raindrops will come in the form of more distressed properties and in a few years we will be able to look back and hopefully find some big 20-30% numbers off of CV.
SD Realtor
May 31, 2008 at 10:31 AM #214789SD RealtorParticipantWell I would agree there is alot of cheerleading in the industry, that is sure the truth. I don’t think any of the regular realtors who post here fall into that category though. Yeah we get the trolls who divebomb in from time to time.
Before bed last night I went into the Realist search and did the foreclosure search within Realist. Indeed 84 properties did come up in Carmel Valley. I did not parse through them individually to to figure out attached verses detached but I know Jim’s work is accurate and I do read his posts. While not all of these distressed properties are on the market it is more then likely that most of them will be eventually. I find that there is a high rate of recidivism for people who fall behind in mortgage payments.
Again, my read is that CV is doing what CV should do. Similarly the properties that get priced even a tad aggressively seem to get scooped up pretty quick. There is no argument that even those that get scooped up have depreciated so that is an encouraging trend to see. So in short it will happen, or shall we say, it IS happening and it will continue to do so. More raindrops will come in the form of more distressed properties and in a few years we will be able to look back and hopefully find some big 20-30% numbers off of CV.
SD Realtor
May 31, 2008 at 10:31 AM #214818SD RealtorParticipantWell I would agree there is alot of cheerleading in the industry, that is sure the truth. I don’t think any of the regular realtors who post here fall into that category though. Yeah we get the trolls who divebomb in from time to time.
Before bed last night I went into the Realist search and did the foreclosure search within Realist. Indeed 84 properties did come up in Carmel Valley. I did not parse through them individually to to figure out attached verses detached but I know Jim’s work is accurate and I do read his posts. While not all of these distressed properties are on the market it is more then likely that most of them will be eventually. I find that there is a high rate of recidivism for people who fall behind in mortgage payments.
Again, my read is that CV is doing what CV should do. Similarly the properties that get priced even a tad aggressively seem to get scooped up pretty quick. There is no argument that even those that get scooped up have depreciated so that is an encouraging trend to see. So in short it will happen, or shall we say, it IS happening and it will continue to do so. More raindrops will come in the form of more distressed properties and in a few years we will be able to look back and hopefully find some big 20-30% numbers off of CV.
SD Realtor
May 31, 2008 at 10:42 AM #214675anParticipantNew_Renter, there’s no “but” from me, just asking for more data to determine a trend. 1 data point does not create a trend, we all should know that. We all already know the condo market in CV is very different than the SFR in CV, nothing new. Stop getting so defensive. We all are hear to analyze the data, hence the site’s motto. If this is the first data point, great, we’ll keep an eye on it to see if it affects the CV market sooner or later. Will CV fall the way MM did 2-3 years from now? No one knows, but we can make educated guess base on the data trickling in every day.
May 31, 2008 at 10:42 AM #214754anParticipantNew_Renter, there’s no “but” from me, just asking for more data to determine a trend. 1 data point does not create a trend, we all should know that. We all already know the condo market in CV is very different than the SFR in CV, nothing new. Stop getting so defensive. We all are hear to analyze the data, hence the site’s motto. If this is the first data point, great, we’ll keep an eye on it to see if it affects the CV market sooner or later. Will CV fall the way MM did 2-3 years from now? No one knows, but we can make educated guess base on the data trickling in every day.
May 31, 2008 at 10:42 AM #214776anParticipantNew_Renter, there’s no “but” from me, just asking for more data to determine a trend. 1 data point does not create a trend, we all should know that. We all already know the condo market in CV is very different than the SFR in CV, nothing new. Stop getting so defensive. We all are hear to analyze the data, hence the site’s motto. If this is the first data point, great, we’ll keep an eye on it to see if it affects the CV market sooner or later. Will CV fall the way MM did 2-3 years from now? No one knows, but we can make educated guess base on the data trickling in every day.
May 31, 2008 at 10:42 AM #214803anParticipantNew_Renter, there’s no “but” from me, just asking for more data to determine a trend. 1 data point does not create a trend, we all should know that. We all already know the condo market in CV is very different than the SFR in CV, nothing new. Stop getting so defensive. We all are hear to analyze the data, hence the site’s motto. If this is the first data point, great, we’ll keep an eye on it to see if it affects the CV market sooner or later. Will CV fall the way MM did 2-3 years from now? No one knows, but we can make educated guess base on the data trickling in every day.
May 31, 2008 at 10:42 AM #214833anParticipantNew_Renter, there’s no “but” from me, just asking for more data to determine a trend. 1 data point does not create a trend, we all should know that. We all already know the condo market in CV is very different than the SFR in CV, nothing new. Stop getting so defensive. We all are hear to analyze the data, hence the site’s motto. If this is the first data point, great, we’ll keep an eye on it to see if it affects the CV market sooner or later. Will CV fall the way MM did 2-3 years from now? No one knows, but we can make educated guess base on the data trickling in every day.
May 31, 2008 at 10:46 AM #214680equalizerParticipantI have doubts single family homes in CV will fall more than 10-15%. Compare them to condos in downtown that are still in a huge bubble. I know it is a cliche, but for rich foriegners paying a $1M for beautiful home in paradise is a bargain when they are used to living in a 2 bedroom flat. Just how many can make it over here is the big question. CV is very desirable area and we had an old thread that stated that 10% of San Diego households are millionaires, excluding homes. At least 2% of the jobs in the area are very high paying, many families are dual professional incomes, many people have cashed out and waiting to buy in CV. Unless we have big recession and people dump cell phones and other gadgets, why would anything change?
May 31, 2008 at 10:46 AM #214759equalizerParticipantI have doubts single family homes in CV will fall more than 10-15%. Compare them to condos in downtown that are still in a huge bubble. I know it is a cliche, but for rich foriegners paying a $1M for beautiful home in paradise is a bargain when they are used to living in a 2 bedroom flat. Just how many can make it over here is the big question. CV is very desirable area and we had an old thread that stated that 10% of San Diego households are millionaires, excluding homes. At least 2% of the jobs in the area are very high paying, many families are dual professional incomes, many people have cashed out and waiting to buy in CV. Unless we have big recession and people dump cell phones and other gadgets, why would anything change?
May 31, 2008 at 10:46 AM #214781equalizerParticipantI have doubts single family homes in CV will fall more than 10-15%. Compare them to condos in downtown that are still in a huge bubble. I know it is a cliche, but for rich foriegners paying a $1M for beautiful home in paradise is a bargain when they are used to living in a 2 bedroom flat. Just how many can make it over here is the big question. CV is very desirable area and we had an old thread that stated that 10% of San Diego households are millionaires, excluding homes. At least 2% of the jobs in the area are very high paying, many families are dual professional incomes, many people have cashed out and waiting to buy in CV. Unless we have big recession and people dump cell phones and other gadgets, why would anything change?
May 31, 2008 at 10:46 AM #214809equalizerParticipantI have doubts single family homes in CV will fall more than 10-15%. Compare them to condos in downtown that are still in a huge bubble. I know it is a cliche, but for rich foriegners paying a $1M for beautiful home in paradise is a bargain when they are used to living in a 2 bedroom flat. Just how many can make it over here is the big question. CV is very desirable area and we had an old thread that stated that 10% of San Diego households are millionaires, excluding homes. At least 2% of the jobs in the area are very high paying, many families are dual professional incomes, many people have cashed out and waiting to buy in CV. Unless we have big recession and people dump cell phones and other gadgets, why would anything change?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.