- This topic has 195 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 1, 2008 at 8:52 PM #215348June 2, 2008 at 10:39 AM #215421AnonymousGuest
rmacdon1
I subscribe to ForeclosureRadar.com and here are today’s stats on foreclosures in Carmel Valley. There are a total 66 Notice of Defaults and 19 Notice of Trustee Sales. Since Jan 2008 there are approximately 14 bank owned properties.
In the 92127 zip code which is mainly 4S Ranch, the numbers are much higher. There are a total 107 Notice of Defaults and 32 Notice of Trustee Sales. Since Jan 2008 there are approximately 52 bank owned properties.
June 2, 2008 at 10:39 AM #215502AnonymousGuestrmacdon1
I subscribe to ForeclosureRadar.com and here are today’s stats on foreclosures in Carmel Valley. There are a total 66 Notice of Defaults and 19 Notice of Trustee Sales. Since Jan 2008 there are approximately 14 bank owned properties.
In the 92127 zip code which is mainly 4S Ranch, the numbers are much higher. There are a total 107 Notice of Defaults and 32 Notice of Trustee Sales. Since Jan 2008 there are approximately 52 bank owned properties.
June 2, 2008 at 10:39 AM #215529AnonymousGuestrmacdon1
I subscribe to ForeclosureRadar.com and here are today’s stats on foreclosures in Carmel Valley. There are a total 66 Notice of Defaults and 19 Notice of Trustee Sales. Since Jan 2008 there are approximately 14 bank owned properties.
In the 92127 zip code which is mainly 4S Ranch, the numbers are much higher. There are a total 107 Notice of Defaults and 32 Notice of Trustee Sales. Since Jan 2008 there are approximately 52 bank owned properties.
June 2, 2008 at 10:39 AM #215553AnonymousGuestrmacdon1
I subscribe to ForeclosureRadar.com and here are today’s stats on foreclosures in Carmel Valley. There are a total 66 Notice of Defaults and 19 Notice of Trustee Sales. Since Jan 2008 there are approximately 14 bank owned properties.
In the 92127 zip code which is mainly 4S Ranch, the numbers are much higher. There are a total 107 Notice of Defaults and 32 Notice of Trustee Sales. Since Jan 2008 there are approximately 52 bank owned properties.
June 2, 2008 at 10:39 AM #215586AnonymousGuestrmacdon1
I subscribe to ForeclosureRadar.com and here are today’s stats on foreclosures in Carmel Valley. There are a total 66 Notice of Defaults and 19 Notice of Trustee Sales. Since Jan 2008 there are approximately 14 bank owned properties.
In the 92127 zip code which is mainly 4S Ranch, the numbers are much higher. There are a total 107 Notice of Defaults and 32 Notice of Trustee Sales. Since Jan 2008 there are approximately 52 bank owned properties.
June 2, 2008 at 3:21 PM #215522FearfulParticipantI have been watching my little area in Torrey Hills closely, and am puzzled by the small declines seen thus far.
I have formed an alternate theory that may explain the stickiness. In Silicon Valley there is a city, Cupertino, that is heavily Chinese. The city has no real redeeming value besides high test scores in the schools, at least relative to any of the other cities in the area. For some reason, Cupertino became a magnet for higher income Chinese professionals (the lower income go to Milpitas, across the valley). The result is that housing prices in Cupertino are, for the quality of what you get (mediocre 1970’s era tract houses), quite high.
I am wondering if the same thing has happened to Carmel Valley and Torrey Hills, especially as I watched a parade of Chinese marching through open houses in this neighborhood, and recent house sales going to Chinese families.
I do not know whether this is significant, or even correct, but if it is, what does it mean for real estate values in the area long term?
June 2, 2008 at 3:21 PM #215605FearfulParticipantI have been watching my little area in Torrey Hills closely, and am puzzled by the small declines seen thus far.
I have formed an alternate theory that may explain the stickiness. In Silicon Valley there is a city, Cupertino, that is heavily Chinese. The city has no real redeeming value besides high test scores in the schools, at least relative to any of the other cities in the area. For some reason, Cupertino became a magnet for higher income Chinese professionals (the lower income go to Milpitas, across the valley). The result is that housing prices in Cupertino are, for the quality of what you get (mediocre 1970’s era tract houses), quite high.
I am wondering if the same thing has happened to Carmel Valley and Torrey Hills, especially as I watched a parade of Chinese marching through open houses in this neighborhood, and recent house sales going to Chinese families.
I do not know whether this is significant, or even correct, but if it is, what does it mean for real estate values in the area long term?
June 2, 2008 at 3:21 PM #215632FearfulParticipantI have been watching my little area in Torrey Hills closely, and am puzzled by the small declines seen thus far.
I have formed an alternate theory that may explain the stickiness. In Silicon Valley there is a city, Cupertino, that is heavily Chinese. The city has no real redeeming value besides high test scores in the schools, at least relative to any of the other cities in the area. For some reason, Cupertino became a magnet for higher income Chinese professionals (the lower income go to Milpitas, across the valley). The result is that housing prices in Cupertino are, for the quality of what you get (mediocre 1970’s era tract houses), quite high.
I am wondering if the same thing has happened to Carmel Valley and Torrey Hills, especially as I watched a parade of Chinese marching through open houses in this neighborhood, and recent house sales going to Chinese families.
I do not know whether this is significant, or even correct, but if it is, what does it mean for real estate values in the area long term?
June 2, 2008 at 3:21 PM #215659FearfulParticipantI have been watching my little area in Torrey Hills closely, and am puzzled by the small declines seen thus far.
I have formed an alternate theory that may explain the stickiness. In Silicon Valley there is a city, Cupertino, that is heavily Chinese. The city has no real redeeming value besides high test scores in the schools, at least relative to any of the other cities in the area. For some reason, Cupertino became a magnet for higher income Chinese professionals (the lower income go to Milpitas, across the valley). The result is that housing prices in Cupertino are, for the quality of what you get (mediocre 1970’s era tract houses), quite high.
I am wondering if the same thing has happened to Carmel Valley and Torrey Hills, especially as I watched a parade of Chinese marching through open houses in this neighborhood, and recent house sales going to Chinese families.
I do not know whether this is significant, or even correct, but if it is, what does it mean for real estate values in the area long term?
June 2, 2008 at 3:21 PM #215687FearfulParticipantI have been watching my little area in Torrey Hills closely, and am puzzled by the small declines seen thus far.
I have formed an alternate theory that may explain the stickiness. In Silicon Valley there is a city, Cupertino, that is heavily Chinese. The city has no real redeeming value besides high test scores in the schools, at least relative to any of the other cities in the area. For some reason, Cupertino became a magnet for higher income Chinese professionals (the lower income go to Milpitas, across the valley). The result is that housing prices in Cupertino are, for the quality of what you get (mediocre 1970’s era tract houses), quite high.
I am wondering if the same thing has happened to Carmel Valley and Torrey Hills, especially as I watched a parade of Chinese marching through open houses in this neighborhood, and recent house sales going to Chinese families.
I do not know whether this is significant, or even correct, but if it is, what does it mean for real estate values in the area long term?
June 2, 2008 at 3:42 PM #215537CoronitaParticipantI have been watching my little area in Torrey Hills closely, and am puzzled by the small declines seen thus far.
I have formed an alternate theory that may explain the stickiness. In Silicon Valley there is a city, Cupertino, that is heavily Chinese. The city has no real redeeming value besides high test scores in the schools, at least relative to any of the other cities in the area. For some reason, Cupertino became a magnet for higher income Chinese professionals (the lower income go to Milpitas, across the valley). The result is that housing prices in Cupertino are, for the quality of what you get (mediocre 1970's era tract houses), quite high.
I am wondering if the same thing has happened to Carmel Valley and Torrey Hills, especially as I watched a parade of Chinese marching through open houses in this neighborhood, and recent house sales going to Chinese families.
I do not know whether this is significant, or even correct, but if it is, what does it mean for real estate values in the area long term?
Trust me,
Carmel Valley schools are not Cupertino's π Bay area has a huge asian population. San Diego is nothing compared to it.
BTW: contrary to popular belief, asian's aren't really "richer" than everyone else. Perhaps, statistically, more are better at money management and better savers/penny pinchers. There is more of an emphasis on a "need" to buy a house versus rent.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
June 2, 2008 at 3:42 PM #215621CoronitaParticipantI have been watching my little area in Torrey Hills closely, and am puzzled by the small declines seen thus far.
I have formed an alternate theory that may explain the stickiness. In Silicon Valley there is a city, Cupertino, that is heavily Chinese. The city has no real redeeming value besides high test scores in the schools, at least relative to any of the other cities in the area. For some reason, Cupertino became a magnet for higher income Chinese professionals (the lower income go to Milpitas, across the valley). The result is that housing prices in Cupertino are, for the quality of what you get (mediocre 1970's era tract houses), quite high.
I am wondering if the same thing has happened to Carmel Valley and Torrey Hills, especially as I watched a parade of Chinese marching through open houses in this neighborhood, and recent house sales going to Chinese families.
I do not know whether this is significant, or even correct, but if it is, what does it mean for real estate values in the area long term?
Trust me,
Carmel Valley schools are not Cupertino's π Bay area has a huge asian population. San Diego is nothing compared to it.
BTW: contrary to popular belief, asian's aren't really "richer" than everyone else. Perhaps, statistically, more are better at money management and better savers/penny pinchers. There is more of an emphasis on a "need" to buy a house versus rent.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
June 2, 2008 at 3:42 PM #215648CoronitaParticipantI have been watching my little area in Torrey Hills closely, and am puzzled by the small declines seen thus far.
I have formed an alternate theory that may explain the stickiness. In Silicon Valley there is a city, Cupertino, that is heavily Chinese. The city has no real redeeming value besides high test scores in the schools, at least relative to any of the other cities in the area. For some reason, Cupertino became a magnet for higher income Chinese professionals (the lower income go to Milpitas, across the valley). The result is that housing prices in Cupertino are, for the quality of what you get (mediocre 1970's era tract houses), quite high.
I am wondering if the same thing has happened to Carmel Valley and Torrey Hills, especially as I watched a parade of Chinese marching through open houses in this neighborhood, and recent house sales going to Chinese families.
I do not know whether this is significant, or even correct, but if it is, what does it mean for real estate values in the area long term?
Trust me,
Carmel Valley schools are not Cupertino's π Bay area has a huge asian population. San Diego is nothing compared to it.
BTW: contrary to popular belief, asian's aren't really "richer" than everyone else. Perhaps, statistically, more are better at money management and better savers/penny pinchers. There is more of an emphasis on a "need" to buy a house versus rent.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
June 2, 2008 at 3:42 PM #215674CoronitaParticipantI have been watching my little area in Torrey Hills closely, and am puzzled by the small declines seen thus far.
I have formed an alternate theory that may explain the stickiness. In Silicon Valley there is a city, Cupertino, that is heavily Chinese. The city has no real redeeming value besides high test scores in the schools, at least relative to any of the other cities in the area. For some reason, Cupertino became a magnet for higher income Chinese professionals (the lower income go to Milpitas, across the valley). The result is that housing prices in Cupertino are, for the quality of what you get (mediocre 1970's era tract houses), quite high.
I am wondering if the same thing has happened to Carmel Valley and Torrey Hills, especially as I watched a parade of Chinese marching through open houses in this neighborhood, and recent house sales going to Chinese families.
I do not know whether this is significant, or even correct, but if it is, what does it mean for real estate values in the area long term?
Trust me,
Carmel Valley schools are not Cupertino's π Bay area has a huge asian population. San Diego is nothing compared to it.
BTW: contrary to popular belief, asian's aren't really "richer" than everyone else. Perhaps, statistically, more are better at money management and better savers/penny pinchers. There is more of an emphasis on a "need" to buy a house versus rent.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.