- This topic has 300 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by Ranjan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 15, 2008 at 5:47 PM #154338February 15, 2008 at 5:52 PM #153967kewpParticipant
Pretty much everyone I know who has money, in fact has used leverage in one form or another to get there.
Watch the confirmation bias, SD. Btw, care to tell us how to use leverage to make a fortune in San Diego real-estate. In the current market?
I’m sure for everyone one of them there are a dozen (or more) bankrupt speculators. Or, at the very least, will soon be.
Yes, leverage works great on the upside. It works just as great when running in reverse, as millions of Americans are going to discover to their horror during the coming Great Unwinding.
But yes, you are right. Leverage is good when judiciously applied. I’m leveraged (a wee bit) on the short side of the collapsing housing bubble.
February 15, 2008 at 5:52 PM #154242kewpParticipantPretty much everyone I know who has money, in fact has used leverage in one form or another to get there.
Watch the confirmation bias, SD. Btw, care to tell us how to use leverage to make a fortune in San Diego real-estate. In the current market?
I’m sure for everyone one of them there are a dozen (or more) bankrupt speculators. Or, at the very least, will soon be.
Yes, leverage works great on the upside. It works just as great when running in reverse, as millions of Americans are going to discover to their horror during the coming Great Unwinding.
But yes, you are right. Leverage is good when judiciously applied. I’m leveraged (a wee bit) on the short side of the collapsing housing bubble.
February 15, 2008 at 5:52 PM #154255kewpParticipantPretty much everyone I know who has money, in fact has used leverage in one form or another to get there.
Watch the confirmation bias, SD. Btw, care to tell us how to use leverage to make a fortune in San Diego real-estate. In the current market?
I’m sure for everyone one of them there are a dozen (or more) bankrupt speculators. Or, at the very least, will soon be.
Yes, leverage works great on the upside. It works just as great when running in reverse, as millions of Americans are going to discover to their horror during the coming Great Unwinding.
But yes, you are right. Leverage is good when judiciously applied. I’m leveraged (a wee bit) on the short side of the collapsing housing bubble.
February 15, 2008 at 5:52 PM #154265kewpParticipantPretty much everyone I know who has money, in fact has used leverage in one form or another to get there.
Watch the confirmation bias, SD. Btw, care to tell us how to use leverage to make a fortune in San Diego real-estate. In the current market?
I’m sure for everyone one of them there are a dozen (or more) bankrupt speculators. Or, at the very least, will soon be.
Yes, leverage works great on the upside. It works just as great when running in reverse, as millions of Americans are going to discover to their horror during the coming Great Unwinding.
But yes, you are right. Leverage is good when judiciously applied. I’m leveraged (a wee bit) on the short side of the collapsing housing bubble.
February 15, 2008 at 5:52 PM #154343kewpParticipantPretty much everyone I know who has money, in fact has used leverage in one form or another to get there.
Watch the confirmation bias, SD. Btw, care to tell us how to use leverage to make a fortune in San Diego real-estate. In the current market?
I’m sure for everyone one of them there are a dozen (or more) bankrupt speculators. Or, at the very least, will soon be.
Yes, leverage works great on the upside. It works just as great when running in reverse, as millions of Americans are going to discover to their horror during the coming Great Unwinding.
But yes, you are right. Leverage is good when judiciously applied. I’m leveraged (a wee bit) on the short side of the collapsing housing bubble.
February 15, 2008 at 6:15 PM #153982RaybyrnesParticipantkewp
I would rather speak to debt as opposed to leverage. Shift risk around. For instance. My parents own their home and are not going to move out or rent. Therefore they can shift the risk of a depreciating investment to the bank by borrowing against it. Let’s say their place is worth 500K. By borrowing against the home they take on a partner (the bank) and simply pay the expense (5 to 6%)in terms of interest. They have effective shifted teh risk of a real estate collapse to the bank.
Now they need to be able to do something with that capital. That is the other side of the equasion.
February 15, 2008 at 6:15 PM #154258RaybyrnesParticipantkewp
I would rather speak to debt as opposed to leverage. Shift risk around. For instance. My parents own their home and are not going to move out or rent. Therefore they can shift the risk of a depreciating investment to the bank by borrowing against it. Let’s say their place is worth 500K. By borrowing against the home they take on a partner (the bank) and simply pay the expense (5 to 6%)in terms of interest. They have effective shifted teh risk of a real estate collapse to the bank.
Now they need to be able to do something with that capital. That is the other side of the equasion.
February 15, 2008 at 6:15 PM #154271RaybyrnesParticipantkewp
I would rather speak to debt as opposed to leverage. Shift risk around. For instance. My parents own their home and are not going to move out or rent. Therefore they can shift the risk of a depreciating investment to the bank by borrowing against it. Let’s say their place is worth 500K. By borrowing against the home they take on a partner (the bank) and simply pay the expense (5 to 6%)in terms of interest. They have effective shifted teh risk of a real estate collapse to the bank.
Now they need to be able to do something with that capital. That is the other side of the equasion.
February 15, 2008 at 6:15 PM #154280RaybyrnesParticipantkewp
I would rather speak to debt as opposed to leverage. Shift risk around. For instance. My parents own their home and are not going to move out or rent. Therefore they can shift the risk of a depreciating investment to the bank by borrowing against it. Let’s say their place is worth 500K. By borrowing against the home they take on a partner (the bank) and simply pay the expense (5 to 6%)in terms of interest. They have effective shifted teh risk of a real estate collapse to the bank.
Now they need to be able to do something with that capital. That is the other side of the equasion.
February 15, 2008 at 6:15 PM #154358RaybyrnesParticipantkewp
I would rather speak to debt as opposed to leverage. Shift risk around. For instance. My parents own their home and are not going to move out or rent. Therefore they can shift the risk of a depreciating investment to the bank by borrowing against it. Let’s say their place is worth 500K. By borrowing against the home they take on a partner (the bank) and simply pay the expense (5 to 6%)in terms of interest. They have effective shifted teh risk of a real estate collapse to the bank.
Now they need to be able to do something with that capital. That is the other side of the equasion.
February 15, 2008 at 6:23 PM #153992kewpParticipantNow they need to be able to do something with that capital. That is the other side of the equasion.
Haha, how about short the bank stock then default on the loan?
February 15, 2008 at 6:23 PM #154268kewpParticipantNow they need to be able to do something with that capital. That is the other side of the equasion.
Haha, how about short the bank stock then default on the loan?
February 15, 2008 at 6:23 PM #154281kewpParticipantNow they need to be able to do something with that capital. That is the other side of the equasion.
Haha, how about short the bank stock then default on the loan?
February 15, 2008 at 6:23 PM #154291kewpParticipantNow they need to be able to do something with that capital. That is the other side of the equasion.
Haha, how about short the bank stock then default on the loan?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.