- This topic has 105 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by
Portlock.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 14, 2009 at 8:39 AM #430104July 14, 2009 at 8:49 AM #429376
LarryTheRenter
ParticipantI was just messing around about the overweight and minority comments….didnt mean to offend…
July 14, 2009 at 8:49 AM #429593LarryTheRenter
ParticipantI was just messing around about the overweight and minority comments….didnt mean to offend…
July 14, 2009 at 8:49 AM #429886LarryTheRenter
ParticipantI was just messing around about the overweight and minority comments….didnt mean to offend…
July 14, 2009 at 8:49 AM #429955LarryTheRenter
ParticipantI was just messing around about the overweight and minority comments….didnt mean to offend…
July 14, 2009 at 8:49 AM #430114LarryTheRenter
ParticipantI was just messing around about the overweight and minority comments….didnt mean to offend…
July 14, 2009 at 9:43 AM #429405Ash Housewares
Participant[quote=temeculaguy] here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. [/quote]
TG I found your dream woman:[img_assist|nid=11491|title=narrow waist|desc=|link=none|align=left|width=400|height=279]
July 14, 2009 at 9:43 AM #429622Ash Housewares
Participant[quote=temeculaguy] here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. [/quote]
TG I found your dream woman:[img_assist|nid=11491|title=narrow waist|desc=|link=none|align=left|width=400|height=279]
July 14, 2009 at 9:43 AM #429916Ash Housewares
Participant[quote=temeculaguy] here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. [/quote]
TG I found your dream woman:[img_assist|nid=11491|title=narrow waist|desc=|link=none|align=left|width=400|height=279]
July 14, 2009 at 9:43 AM #429985Ash Housewares
Participant[quote=temeculaguy] here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. [/quote]
TG I found your dream woman:[img_assist|nid=11491|title=narrow waist|desc=|link=none|align=left|width=400|height=279]
July 14, 2009 at 9:43 AM #430144Ash Housewares
Participant[quote=temeculaguy] here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. [/quote]
TG I found your dream woman:[img_assist|nid=11491|title=narrow waist|desc=|link=none|align=left|width=400|height=279]
July 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM #429493CBad
ParticipantUm, pretty sure if the new SG was a white dude and the same amount overweight, we wouldn’t even be seeing this thread. Didn’t know part of the SG’s qualifications was the rule, “no fat chicks”.
July 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM #429711CBad
ParticipantUm, pretty sure if the new SG was a white dude and the same amount overweight, we wouldn’t even be seeing this thread. Didn’t know part of the SG’s qualifications was the rule, “no fat chicks”.
July 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM #430003CBad
ParticipantUm, pretty sure if the new SG was a white dude and the same amount overweight, we wouldn’t even be seeing this thread. Didn’t know part of the SG’s qualifications was the rule, “no fat chicks”.
July 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM #430073CBad
ParticipantUm, pretty sure if the new SG was a white dude and the same amount overweight, we wouldn’t even be seeing this thread. Didn’t know part of the SG’s qualifications was the rule, “no fat chicks”.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.