- This topic has 385 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 8 months ago by
NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 4, 2008 at 4:40 PM #12353April 4, 2008 at 4:56 PM #181257
an
ParticipantI wonder if this will affect areas that are current right below the old $417k conforming limit. My thinking is there are people who couldn’t afford 450-600k house before due to rates, so they settle for $350-450k instead. But now that they can stretch, the demand would drop for the 350-450k range because they now can stretch to 450-600k. So for the low end of NCC ($450-600k), this might have a positive affect, but the $350-450k market might see a decrease? That’s my guess.
April 4, 2008 at 4:56 PM #181269an
ParticipantI wonder if this will affect areas that are current right below the old $417k conforming limit. My thinking is there are people who couldn’t afford 450-600k house before due to rates, so they settle for $350-450k instead. But now that they can stretch, the demand would drop for the 350-450k range because they now can stretch to 450-600k. So for the low end of NCC ($450-600k), this might have a positive affect, but the $350-450k market might see a decrease? That’s my guess.
April 4, 2008 at 4:56 PM #181297an
ParticipantI wonder if this will affect areas that are current right below the old $417k conforming limit. My thinking is there are people who couldn’t afford 450-600k house before due to rates, so they settle for $350-450k instead. But now that they can stretch, the demand would drop for the 350-450k range because they now can stretch to 450-600k. So for the low end of NCC ($450-600k), this might have a positive affect, but the $350-450k market might see a decrease? That’s my guess.
April 4, 2008 at 4:56 PM #181306an
ParticipantI wonder if this will affect areas that are current right below the old $417k conforming limit. My thinking is there are people who couldn’t afford 450-600k house before due to rates, so they settle for $350-450k instead. But now that they can stretch, the demand would drop for the 350-450k range because they now can stretch to 450-600k. So for the low end of NCC ($450-600k), this might have a positive affect, but the $350-450k market might see a decrease? That’s my guess.
April 4, 2008 at 4:56 PM #181310an
ParticipantI wonder if this will affect areas that are current right below the old $417k conforming limit. My thinking is there are people who couldn’t afford 450-600k house before due to rates, so they settle for $350-450k instead. But now that they can stretch, the demand would drop for the 350-450k range because they now can stretch to 450-600k. So for the low end of NCC ($450-600k), this might have a positive affect, but the $350-450k market might see a decrease? That’s my guess.
April 4, 2008 at 8:07 PM #181327sheilawellington
ParticipantUnfortunately these policy changes will slow down the reduction in prices that we expect. Of course, many of the new borrowers will become FBs, banks will lose money, or rather, Freddie and Fannie will.
Then the Fed will have to bail them out and print more money in the process… I can only see inflation increasing at high rates in ’08 and beyond.
Raising the conforming limits will come at a cost. We’ll pay for it.
April 4, 2008 at 8:07 PM #181339sheilawellington
ParticipantUnfortunately these policy changes will slow down the reduction in prices that we expect. Of course, many of the new borrowers will become FBs, banks will lose money, or rather, Freddie and Fannie will.
Then the Fed will have to bail them out and print more money in the process… I can only see inflation increasing at high rates in ’08 and beyond.
Raising the conforming limits will come at a cost. We’ll pay for it.
April 4, 2008 at 8:07 PM #181369sheilawellington
ParticipantUnfortunately these policy changes will slow down the reduction in prices that we expect. Of course, many of the new borrowers will become FBs, banks will lose money, or rather, Freddie and Fannie will.
Then the Fed will have to bail them out and print more money in the process… I can only see inflation increasing at high rates in ’08 and beyond.
Raising the conforming limits will come at a cost. We’ll pay for it.
April 4, 2008 at 8:07 PM #181376sheilawellington
ParticipantUnfortunately these policy changes will slow down the reduction in prices that we expect. Of course, many of the new borrowers will become FBs, banks will lose money, or rather, Freddie and Fannie will.
Then the Fed will have to bail them out and print more money in the process… I can only see inflation increasing at high rates in ’08 and beyond.
Raising the conforming limits will come at a cost. We’ll pay for it.
April 4, 2008 at 8:07 PM #181380sheilawellington
ParticipantUnfortunately these policy changes will slow down the reduction in prices that we expect. Of course, many of the new borrowers will become FBs, banks will lose money, or rather, Freddie and Fannie will.
Then the Fed will have to bail them out and print more money in the process… I can only see inflation increasing at high rates in ’08 and beyond.
Raising the conforming limits will come at a cost. We’ll pay for it.
April 5, 2008 at 9:49 AM #181472barnaby33
ParticipantRed herring alert. You still have to have a fat down payment for conforming loans. Fat is defined as 20%. I can barely scrape together 20% on 400k. Raising loan limits isn’t going to change that.
Josh
April 5, 2008 at 9:49 AM #181484barnaby33
ParticipantRed herring alert. You still have to have a fat down payment for conforming loans. Fat is defined as 20%. I can barely scrape together 20% on 400k. Raising loan limits isn’t going to change that.
Josh
April 5, 2008 at 9:49 AM #181513barnaby33
ParticipantRed herring alert. You still have to have a fat down payment for conforming loans. Fat is defined as 20%. I can barely scrape together 20% on 400k. Raising loan limits isn’t going to change that.
Josh
April 5, 2008 at 9:49 AM #181520barnaby33
ParticipantRed herring alert. You still have to have a fat down payment for conforming loans. Fat is defined as 20%. I can barely scrape together 20% on 400k. Raising loan limits isn’t going to change that.
Josh
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
