- This topic has 50 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 2 months ago by
larrylujack.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 29, 2008 at 10:37 PM #278260September 29, 2008 at 10:39 PM #277939
kev374
ParticipantPalin has a really annoying voice!
September 29, 2008 at 10:39 PM #278202kev374
ParticipantPalin has a really annoying voice!
September 29, 2008 at 10:39 PM #278216kev374
ParticipantPalin has a really annoying voice!
September 29, 2008 at 10:39 PM #278253kev374
ParticipantPalin has a really annoying voice!
September 29, 2008 at 10:39 PM #278265kev374
ParticipantPalin has a really annoying voice!
September 30, 2008 at 9:30 AM #278029cr
ParticipantAll this Palin-bashing is proof that Americans don’t really care what their leaders stand for, only how nice a smile and how ingenu, I mean genuine their sunshine blowing BS is.
That’s also why I believe RP never had a chance.
September 30, 2008 at 9:30 AM #278292cr
ParticipantAll this Palin-bashing is proof that Americans don’t really care what their leaders stand for, only how nice a smile and how ingenu, I mean genuine their sunshine blowing BS is.
That’s also why I believe RP never had a chance.
September 30, 2008 at 9:30 AM #278306cr
ParticipantAll this Palin-bashing is proof that Americans don’t really care what their leaders stand for, only how nice a smile and how ingenu, I mean genuine their sunshine blowing BS is.
That’s also why I believe RP never had a chance.
September 30, 2008 at 9:30 AM #278343cr
ParticipantAll this Palin-bashing is proof that Americans don’t really care what their leaders stand for, only how nice a smile and how ingenu, I mean genuine their sunshine blowing BS is.
That’s also why I believe RP never had a chance.
September 30, 2008 at 9:30 AM #278355cr
ParticipantAll this Palin-bashing is proof that Americans don’t really care what their leaders stand for, only how nice a smile and how ingenu, I mean genuine their sunshine blowing BS is.
That’s also why I believe RP never had a chance.
September 30, 2008 at 11:25 AM #278089afx114
ParticipantThe sad thing is that the majority of Tina Fey’s script was word-for-word from Palin’s interview, meaning that the content itself is funny/ridiculous/outrageous without much alteration.
September 30, 2008 at 11:25 AM #278352afx114
ParticipantThe sad thing is that the majority of Tina Fey’s script was word-for-word from Palin’s interview, meaning that the content itself is funny/ridiculous/outrageous without much alteration.
September 30, 2008 at 11:25 AM #278366afx114
ParticipantThe sad thing is that the majority of Tina Fey’s script was word-for-word from Palin’s interview, meaning that the content itself is funny/ridiculous/outrageous without much alteration.
September 30, 2008 at 11:25 AM #278402afx114
ParticipantThe sad thing is that the majority of Tina Fey’s script was word-for-word from Palin’s interview, meaning that the content itself is funny/ridiculous/outrageous without much alteration.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
