- This topic has 65 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 6 months ago by urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 6, 2008 at 10:08 PM #282736October 6, 2008 at 10:12 PM #282410CoronitaParticipant
[quote=meadandale]I’m thinking of calling Citi Mortgage and telling them that I don’t want to pay my mortgage anymore if they don’t write down my principle at least a hundred grand. Otherwise I’ll just hand them the keys. Think it will work?[/quote]
It only works if you don’t have a significant downpayment and have no assets to boot.
In other words, if you were actually responsible and put a non-trivial downpayment, chances are that won’t work. And if you refinance and turn it into a recourse loan, and you have assets, who knows if they go after you.
In fact, that might be a great business idea. Collection agency to collect on recourse loans.
October 6, 2008 at 10:12 PM #282692CoronitaParticipant[quote=meadandale]I’m thinking of calling Citi Mortgage and telling them that I don’t want to pay my mortgage anymore if they don’t write down my principle at least a hundred grand. Otherwise I’ll just hand them the keys. Think it will work?[/quote]
It only works if you don’t have a significant downpayment and have no assets to boot.
In other words, if you were actually responsible and put a non-trivial downpayment, chances are that won’t work. And if you refinance and turn it into a recourse loan, and you have assets, who knows if they go after you.
In fact, that might be a great business idea. Collection agency to collect on recourse loans.
October 6, 2008 at 10:12 PM #282746CoronitaParticipant[quote=meadandale]I’m thinking of calling Citi Mortgage and telling them that I don’t want to pay my mortgage anymore if they don’t write down my principle at least a hundred grand. Otherwise I’ll just hand them the keys. Think it will work?[/quote]
It only works if you don’t have a significant downpayment and have no assets to boot.
In other words, if you were actually responsible and put a non-trivial downpayment, chances are that won’t work. And if you refinance and turn it into a recourse loan, and you have assets, who knows if they go after you.
In fact, that might be a great business idea. Collection agency to collect on recourse loans.
October 6, 2008 at 10:12 PM #282718CoronitaParticipant[quote=meadandale]I’m thinking of calling Citi Mortgage and telling them that I don’t want to pay my mortgage anymore if they don’t write down my principle at least a hundred grand. Otherwise I’ll just hand them the keys. Think it will work?[/quote]
It only works if you don’t have a significant downpayment and have no assets to boot.
In other words, if you were actually responsible and put a non-trivial downpayment, chances are that won’t work. And if you refinance and turn it into a recourse loan, and you have assets, who knows if they go after you.
In fact, that might be a great business idea. Collection agency to collect on recourse loans.
October 6, 2008 at 10:12 PM #282735CoronitaParticipant[quote=meadandale]I’m thinking of calling Citi Mortgage and telling them that I don’t want to pay my mortgage anymore if they don’t write down my principle at least a hundred grand. Otherwise I’ll just hand them the keys. Think it will work?[/quote]
It only works if you don’t have a significant downpayment and have no assets to boot.
In other words, if you were actually responsible and put a non-trivial downpayment, chances are that won’t work. And if you refinance and turn it into a recourse loan, and you have assets, who knows if they go after you.
In fact, that might be a great business idea. Collection agency to collect on recourse loans.
October 6, 2008 at 10:20 PM #282420CoronitaParticipant[quote=Huckleberry]My thought on this is BofA announced it will do this because of the litigation and settlement. I’m sure they figure if they state they are voluntarily doing this, they will not be mandated by the govt to do it.
It’s really hard for me to believe the banks would just take the hit (write-off) completely, and just expunge the borrower of the original obligation and lost loan value.
I would speculate they will minimally lower the principal loan amount (from original) and work some sort of deal where they get compensation on the end of the loan. Maybe making new mortgages a 40 or 50 year and the interest fixed a 6.
Here is an article by MM related to how CW/BofA is structuring their mortgage modifications:
http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/09/03/countrywidebofa-conspire-against-a-borrower-shareholders/I’ll bet the new program is along these lines…[/quote]
You know, no offense to some of you older farts…I sort of chuckled when I heard some folks in their mid 40ies or 50ies getting a 30 year loan.
But….How does a bank justify a 40 or 50 year loan for someone that is in their mid forties or older? Do the banks really expect someone to work until 85-95???
LOL..Sorry, not that I’m trying to make fun of older people. But I always though 30year loans were pushing it already beyond a certain age. But a 40 or 50 year loan?
Perhaps banks will start adopting a loan program such that it makes your kids co-sign.
October 6, 2008 at 10:20 PM #282756CoronitaParticipant[quote=Huckleberry]My thought on this is BofA announced it will do this because of the litigation and settlement. I’m sure they figure if they state they are voluntarily doing this, they will not be mandated by the govt to do it.
It’s really hard for me to believe the banks would just take the hit (write-off) completely, and just expunge the borrower of the original obligation and lost loan value.
I would speculate they will minimally lower the principal loan amount (from original) and work some sort of deal where they get compensation on the end of the loan. Maybe making new mortgages a 40 or 50 year and the interest fixed a 6.
Here is an article by MM related to how CW/BofA is structuring their mortgage modifications:
http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/09/03/countrywidebofa-conspire-against-a-borrower-shareholders/I’ll bet the new program is along these lines…[/quote]
You know, no offense to some of you older farts…I sort of chuckled when I heard some folks in their mid 40ies or 50ies getting a 30 year loan.
But….How does a bank justify a 40 or 50 year loan for someone that is in their mid forties or older? Do the banks really expect someone to work until 85-95???
LOL..Sorry, not that I’m trying to make fun of older people. But I always though 30year loans were pushing it already beyond a certain age. But a 40 or 50 year loan?
Perhaps banks will start adopting a loan program such that it makes your kids co-sign.
October 6, 2008 at 10:20 PM #282745CoronitaParticipant[quote=Huckleberry]My thought on this is BofA announced it will do this because of the litigation and settlement. I’m sure they figure if they state they are voluntarily doing this, they will not be mandated by the govt to do it.
It’s really hard for me to believe the banks would just take the hit (write-off) completely, and just expunge the borrower of the original obligation and lost loan value.
I would speculate they will minimally lower the principal loan amount (from original) and work some sort of deal where they get compensation on the end of the loan. Maybe making new mortgages a 40 or 50 year and the interest fixed a 6.
Here is an article by MM related to how CW/BofA is structuring their mortgage modifications:
http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/09/03/countrywidebofa-conspire-against-a-borrower-shareholders/I’ll bet the new program is along these lines…[/quote]
You know, no offense to some of you older farts…I sort of chuckled when I heard some folks in their mid 40ies or 50ies getting a 30 year loan.
But….How does a bank justify a 40 or 50 year loan for someone that is in their mid forties or older? Do the banks really expect someone to work until 85-95???
LOL..Sorry, not that I’m trying to make fun of older people. But I always though 30year loans were pushing it already beyond a certain age. But a 40 or 50 year loan?
Perhaps banks will start adopting a loan program such that it makes your kids co-sign.
October 6, 2008 at 10:20 PM #282728CoronitaParticipant[quote=Huckleberry]My thought on this is BofA announced it will do this because of the litigation and settlement. I’m sure they figure if they state they are voluntarily doing this, they will not be mandated by the govt to do it.
It’s really hard for me to believe the banks would just take the hit (write-off) completely, and just expunge the borrower of the original obligation and lost loan value.
I would speculate they will minimally lower the principal loan amount (from original) and work some sort of deal where they get compensation on the end of the loan. Maybe making new mortgages a 40 or 50 year and the interest fixed a 6.
Here is an article by MM related to how CW/BofA is structuring their mortgage modifications:
http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/09/03/countrywidebofa-conspire-against-a-borrower-shareholders/I’ll bet the new program is along these lines…[/quote]
You know, no offense to some of you older farts…I sort of chuckled when I heard some folks in their mid 40ies or 50ies getting a 30 year loan.
But….How does a bank justify a 40 or 50 year loan for someone that is in their mid forties or older? Do the banks really expect someone to work until 85-95???
LOL..Sorry, not that I’m trying to make fun of older people. But I always though 30year loans were pushing it already beyond a certain age. But a 40 or 50 year loan?
Perhaps banks will start adopting a loan program such that it makes your kids co-sign.
October 6, 2008 at 10:20 PM #282702CoronitaParticipant[quote=Huckleberry]My thought on this is BofA announced it will do this because of the litigation and settlement. I’m sure they figure if they state they are voluntarily doing this, they will not be mandated by the govt to do it.
It’s really hard for me to believe the banks would just take the hit (write-off) completely, and just expunge the borrower of the original obligation and lost loan value.
I would speculate they will minimally lower the principal loan amount (from original) and work some sort of deal where they get compensation on the end of the loan. Maybe making new mortgages a 40 or 50 year and the interest fixed a 6.
Here is an article by MM related to how CW/BofA is structuring their mortgage modifications:
http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/09/03/countrywidebofa-conspire-against-a-borrower-shareholders/I’ll bet the new program is along these lines…[/quote]
You know, no offense to some of you older farts…I sort of chuckled when I heard some folks in their mid 40ies or 50ies getting a 30 year loan.
But….How does a bank justify a 40 or 50 year loan for someone that is in their mid forties or older? Do the banks really expect someone to work until 85-95???
LOL..Sorry, not that I’m trying to make fun of older people. But I always though 30year loans were pushing it already beyond a certain age. But a 40 or 50 year loan?
Perhaps banks will start adopting a loan program such that it makes your kids co-sign.
October 7, 2008 at 8:42 AM #282861AnonymousGuestThey could either attach a silent 2nd lien or write it off.
An old co-worker of mine was offered foregiveness on his entire 2nd. They were willing to make it a silent 2nd, which he’d have to pay off if/when he sold the home. He didn’t like that option. I don’t know the final outcome(what decision he made) and I can’t remember who the lender was.That is going to be a huge hit for BofA. I wonder if they will use the income stated on the 1003, or if they will requalify them on their current real income. Don’t forget that CW did a ton of stated option ARM’s and the minimum payment(1%) was used to qualify them.
October 7, 2008 at 8:42 AM #282525AnonymousGuestThey could either attach a silent 2nd lien or write it off.
An old co-worker of mine was offered foregiveness on his entire 2nd. They were willing to make it a silent 2nd, which he’d have to pay off if/when he sold the home. He didn’t like that option. I don’t know the final outcome(what decision he made) and I can’t remember who the lender was.That is going to be a huge hit for BofA. I wonder if they will use the income stated on the 1003, or if they will requalify them on their current real income. Don’t forget that CW did a ton of stated option ARM’s and the minimum payment(1%) was used to qualify them.
October 7, 2008 at 8:42 AM #282850AnonymousGuestThey could either attach a silent 2nd lien or write it off.
An old co-worker of mine was offered foregiveness on his entire 2nd. They were willing to make it a silent 2nd, which he’d have to pay off if/when he sold the home. He didn’t like that option. I don’t know the final outcome(what decision he made) and I can’t remember who the lender was.That is going to be a huge hit for BofA. I wonder if they will use the income stated on the 1003, or if they will requalify them on their current real income. Don’t forget that CW did a ton of stated option ARM’s and the minimum payment(1%) was used to qualify them.
October 7, 2008 at 8:42 AM #282807AnonymousGuestThey could either attach a silent 2nd lien or write it off.
An old co-worker of mine was offered foregiveness on his entire 2nd. They were willing to make it a silent 2nd, which he’d have to pay off if/when he sold the home. He didn’t like that option. I don’t know the final outcome(what decision he made) and I can’t remember who the lender was.That is going to be a huge hit for BofA. I wonder if they will use the income stated on the 1003, or if they will requalify them on their current real income. Don’t forget that CW did a ton of stated option ARM’s and the minimum payment(1%) was used to qualify them.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.