- This topic has 20 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by BuyerWillEPB.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 12, 2008 at 5:54 PM #13582August 12, 2008 at 7:31 PM #256274EconProfParticipant
This happens a lot, which is one argument for applying for two parrallel loans. Then, when closing time approaches, they can’t pull costly surprises like this. You can bolt.
They knew they had you in a bind and had to go forward. You had no negotiating leverage. Yes, it costs extra to have such backup…I believe just the cost of another appraisal.
Any other Piggs ever try this? I have not, but have seen it advocated.August 12, 2008 at 7:31 PM #256454EconProfParticipantThis happens a lot, which is one argument for applying for two parrallel loans. Then, when closing time approaches, they can’t pull costly surprises like this. You can bolt.
They knew they had you in a bind and had to go forward. You had no negotiating leverage. Yes, it costs extra to have such backup…I believe just the cost of another appraisal.
Any other Piggs ever try this? I have not, but have seen it advocated.August 12, 2008 at 7:31 PM #256462EconProfParticipantThis happens a lot, which is one argument for applying for two parrallel loans. Then, when closing time approaches, they can’t pull costly surprises like this. You can bolt.
They knew they had you in a bind and had to go forward. You had no negotiating leverage. Yes, it costs extra to have such backup…I believe just the cost of another appraisal.
Any other Piggs ever try this? I have not, but have seen it advocated.August 12, 2008 at 7:31 PM #256518EconProfParticipantThis happens a lot, which is one argument for applying for two parrallel loans. Then, when closing time approaches, they can’t pull costly surprises like this. You can bolt.
They knew they had you in a bind and had to go forward. You had no negotiating leverage. Yes, it costs extra to have such backup…I believe just the cost of another appraisal.
Any other Piggs ever try this? I have not, but have seen it advocated.August 12, 2008 at 7:31 PM #256565EconProfParticipantThis happens a lot, which is one argument for applying for two parrallel loans. Then, when closing time approaches, they can’t pull costly surprises like this. You can bolt.
They knew they had you in a bind and had to go forward. You had no negotiating leverage. Yes, it costs extra to have such backup…I believe just the cost of another appraisal.
Any other Piggs ever try this? I have not, but have seen it advocated.August 12, 2008 at 7:57 PM #256279waiting hawkParticipantYES! do 2 loans at once. Countrywide tried some weird crap on me and I got crazy with them. Any place will take their time knowing you are stuck then you have to go with them. Especially with a $100 per day charge with foreclosures (they charge you 100-150 per day if you dont close after 30 days). That is what happend to me. I had to get an extention on both properties I bought. One was 50% down and the other was 30% down. 0 debt, high ficos AND THEY STILL COULDNT close on time. Be very carefull.
August 12, 2008 at 7:57 PM #256459waiting hawkParticipantYES! do 2 loans at once. Countrywide tried some weird crap on me and I got crazy with them. Any place will take their time knowing you are stuck then you have to go with them. Especially with a $100 per day charge with foreclosures (they charge you 100-150 per day if you dont close after 30 days). That is what happend to me. I had to get an extention on both properties I bought. One was 50% down and the other was 30% down. 0 debt, high ficos AND THEY STILL COULDNT close on time. Be very carefull.
August 12, 2008 at 7:57 PM #256467waiting hawkParticipantYES! do 2 loans at once. Countrywide tried some weird crap on me and I got crazy with them. Any place will take their time knowing you are stuck then you have to go with them. Especially with a $100 per day charge with foreclosures (they charge you 100-150 per day if you dont close after 30 days). That is what happend to me. I had to get an extention on both properties I bought. One was 50% down and the other was 30% down. 0 debt, high ficos AND THEY STILL COULDNT close on time. Be very carefull.
August 12, 2008 at 7:57 PM #256523waiting hawkParticipantYES! do 2 loans at once. Countrywide tried some weird crap on me and I got crazy with them. Any place will take their time knowing you are stuck then you have to go with them. Especially with a $100 per day charge with foreclosures (they charge you 100-150 per day if you dont close after 30 days). That is what happend to me. I had to get an extention on both properties I bought. One was 50% down and the other was 30% down. 0 debt, high ficos AND THEY STILL COULDNT close on time. Be very carefull.
August 12, 2008 at 7:57 PM #256570waiting hawkParticipantYES! do 2 loans at once. Countrywide tried some weird crap on me and I got crazy with them. Any place will take their time knowing you are stuck then you have to go with them. Especially with a $100 per day charge with foreclosures (they charge you 100-150 per day if you dont close after 30 days). That is what happend to me. I had to get an extention on both properties I bought. One was 50% down and the other was 30% down. 0 debt, high ficos AND THEY STILL COULDNT close on time. Be very carefull.
August 12, 2008 at 11:35 PM #256544urbanrealtorParticipantIt has been my experience that using a broker as opposed to a bank employee for this can minimize this sort of thing. However, that means using a really good one.
This is because they only work for the buyer and only get paid by them upon a successful close. This adds incentive to either go to bat with the bank rep or to double down on a second loan. Either way, a good loan broker is a huge asset in a transaction.
The plus side with bank employees is that they sometimes have a better grasp on the idiosyncrasies of their loan products than a broker would have.
I cannot speak to your experience with Navy fed. Recently I closed one with them, and they were competent but it was clear that the individuals I dealt with were not broadly experienced or accustomed to dealing with curve balls. Unfortunately, there were many curve balls.
A good loan broker is a huge asset. A good bank employee has good skills and deep knowledge about the products they peddle. A poor broker is cheesy used loan salesman. A poor bank employee was a teller a month ago and doesn’t care about your loan closing because it has minimal impact on his regular salary.
I have only had one loan officer (broker or bank employee) who has given me zero drama ever. Dave Espinosa ([email protected]). No he is not paying me. No I am not dating him. I just really like his service. He is blunt and honest and says things like “I can’t quote you a rate without more information.” Being honest makes him more effective at his job but less effective at getting dumb or uninformed clients.
August 12, 2008 at 11:35 PM #256654urbanrealtorParticipantIt has been my experience that using a broker as opposed to a bank employee for this can minimize this sort of thing. However, that means using a really good one.
This is because they only work for the buyer and only get paid by them upon a successful close. This adds incentive to either go to bat with the bank rep or to double down on a second loan. Either way, a good loan broker is a huge asset in a transaction.
The plus side with bank employees is that they sometimes have a better grasp on the idiosyncrasies of their loan products than a broker would have.
I cannot speak to your experience with Navy fed. Recently I closed one with them, and they were competent but it was clear that the individuals I dealt with were not broadly experienced or accustomed to dealing with curve balls. Unfortunately, there were many curve balls.
A good loan broker is a huge asset. A good bank employee has good skills and deep knowledge about the products they peddle. A poor broker is cheesy used loan salesman. A poor bank employee was a teller a month ago and doesn’t care about your loan closing because it has minimal impact on his regular salary.
I have only had one loan officer (broker or bank employee) who has given me zero drama ever. Dave Espinosa ([email protected]). No he is not paying me. No I am not dating him. I just really like his service. He is blunt and honest and says things like “I can’t quote you a rate without more information.” Being honest makes him more effective at his job but less effective at getting dumb or uninformed clients.
August 12, 2008 at 11:35 PM #256608urbanrealtorParticipantIt has been my experience that using a broker as opposed to a bank employee for this can minimize this sort of thing. However, that means using a really good one.
This is because they only work for the buyer and only get paid by them upon a successful close. This adds incentive to either go to bat with the bank rep or to double down on a second loan. Either way, a good loan broker is a huge asset in a transaction.
The plus side with bank employees is that they sometimes have a better grasp on the idiosyncrasies of their loan products than a broker would have.
I cannot speak to your experience with Navy fed. Recently I closed one with them, and they were competent but it was clear that the individuals I dealt with were not broadly experienced or accustomed to dealing with curve balls. Unfortunately, there were many curve balls.
A good loan broker is a huge asset. A good bank employee has good skills and deep knowledge about the products they peddle. A poor broker is cheesy used loan salesman. A poor bank employee was a teller a month ago and doesn’t care about your loan closing because it has minimal impact on his regular salary.
I have only had one loan officer (broker or bank employee) who has given me zero drama ever. Dave Espinosa ([email protected]). No he is not paying me. No I am not dating him. I just really like his service. He is blunt and honest and says things like “I can’t quote you a rate without more information.” Being honest makes him more effective at his job but less effective at getting dumb or uninformed clients.
August 12, 2008 at 11:35 PM #256551urbanrealtorParticipantIt has been my experience that using a broker as opposed to a bank employee for this can minimize this sort of thing. However, that means using a really good one.
This is because they only work for the buyer and only get paid by them upon a successful close. This adds incentive to either go to bat with the bank rep or to double down on a second loan. Either way, a good loan broker is a huge asset in a transaction.
The plus side with bank employees is that they sometimes have a better grasp on the idiosyncrasies of their loan products than a broker would have.
I cannot speak to your experience with Navy fed. Recently I closed one with them, and they were competent but it was clear that the individuals I dealt with were not broadly experienced or accustomed to dealing with curve balls. Unfortunately, there were many curve balls.
A good loan broker is a huge asset. A good bank employee has good skills and deep knowledge about the products they peddle. A poor broker is cheesy used loan salesman. A poor bank employee was a teller a month ago and doesn’t care about your loan closing because it has minimal impact on his regular salary.
I have only had one loan officer (broker or bank employee) who has given me zero drama ever. Dave Espinosa ([email protected]). No he is not paying me. No I am not dating him. I just really like his service. He is blunt and honest and says things like “I can’t quote you a rate without more information.” Being honest makes him more effective at his job but less effective at getting dumb or uninformed clients.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.