Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › National Association of Realtors Calls for Bottom
- This topic has 45 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by 4plexowner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 10, 2007 at 11:23 AM #113171December 10, 2007 at 11:52 AM #113320(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant
How the hell have mortgage conditions gotten ‘better’?
I think they meant in the very short -term. From the initial panic in August-September to now. Remember, at the initial stages of the panic many programs stopped and getting a loan funded at all was very difficult. Jumbos were well over 1 point higher than conventional. Over time, various loan programs seem to have come back on line and the spread between Jumbos and conforming is closer to 0.5%.
So, basically they are saying that sales have improved slightly from a pretty horrendous rate. Note that even at this slightly higher sales rate that sales are less than they were at this time in 2001, in the months after 9/11.
December 10, 2007 at 11:52 AM #113120(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantHow the hell have mortgage conditions gotten ‘better’?
I think they meant in the very short -term. From the initial panic in August-September to now. Remember, at the initial stages of the panic many programs stopped and getting a loan funded at all was very difficult. Jumbos were well over 1 point higher than conventional. Over time, various loan programs seem to have come back on line and the spread between Jumbos and conforming is closer to 0.5%.
So, basically they are saying that sales have improved slightly from a pretty horrendous rate. Note that even at this slightly higher sales rate that sales are less than they were at this time in 2001, in the months after 9/11.
December 10, 2007 at 11:52 AM #113283(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantHow the hell have mortgage conditions gotten ‘better’?
I think they meant in the very short -term. From the initial panic in August-September to now. Remember, at the initial stages of the panic many programs stopped and getting a loan funded at all was very difficult. Jumbos were well over 1 point higher than conventional. Over time, various loan programs seem to have come back on line and the spread between Jumbos and conforming is closer to 0.5%.
So, basically they are saying that sales have improved slightly from a pretty horrendous rate. Note that even at this slightly higher sales rate that sales are less than they were at this time in 2001, in the months after 9/11.
December 10, 2007 at 11:52 AM #113277(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantHow the hell have mortgage conditions gotten ‘better’?
I think they meant in the very short -term. From the initial panic in August-September to now. Remember, at the initial stages of the panic many programs stopped and getting a loan funded at all was very difficult. Jumbos were well over 1 point higher than conventional. Over time, various loan programs seem to have come back on line and the spread between Jumbos and conforming is closer to 0.5%.
So, basically they are saying that sales have improved slightly from a pretty horrendous rate. Note that even at this slightly higher sales rate that sales are less than they were at this time in 2001, in the months after 9/11.
December 10, 2007 at 11:52 AM #113236(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantHow the hell have mortgage conditions gotten ‘better’?
I think they meant in the very short -term. From the initial panic in August-September to now. Remember, at the initial stages of the panic many programs stopped and getting a loan funded at all was very difficult. Jumbos were well over 1 point higher than conventional. Over time, various loan programs seem to have come back on line and the spread between Jumbos and conforming is closer to 0.5%.
So, basically they are saying that sales have improved slightly from a pretty horrendous rate. Note that even at this slightly higher sales rate that sales are less than they were at this time in 2001, in the months after 9/11.
December 10, 2007 at 3:11 PM #113255crParticipantI think he means conditions in which bad mortgages were made have been corrected so logically we’ve seen all the bad mortgages default, and we’re through the worst of it.
Phew!
December 10, 2007 at 3:11 PM #113371crParticipantI think he means conditions in which bad mortgages were made have been corrected so logically we’ve seen all the bad mortgages default, and we’re through the worst of it.
Phew!
December 10, 2007 at 3:11 PM #113412crParticipantI think he means conditions in which bad mortgages were made have been corrected so logically we’ve seen all the bad mortgages default, and we’re through the worst of it.
Phew!
December 10, 2007 at 3:11 PM #113417crParticipantI think he means conditions in which bad mortgages were made have been corrected so logically we’ve seen all the bad mortgages default, and we’re through the worst of it.
Phew!
December 10, 2007 at 3:11 PM #113455crParticipantI think he means conditions in which bad mortgages were made have been corrected so logically we’ve seen all the bad mortgages default, and we’re through the worst of it.
Phew!
December 10, 2007 at 6:39 PM #1135124plexownerParticipantMish says: “yet another fantasyland call from the NAR”
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/12/another-fantasyland-call-from-nar.html
December 10, 2007 at 6:39 PM #1136324plexownerParticipantMish says: “yet another fantasyland call from the NAR”
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/12/another-fantasyland-call-from-nar.html
December 10, 2007 at 6:39 PM #1136734plexownerParticipantMish says: “yet another fantasyland call from the NAR”
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/12/another-fantasyland-call-from-nar.html
December 10, 2007 at 6:39 PM #1136794plexownerParticipantMish says: “yet another fantasyland call from the NAR”
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/12/another-fantasyland-call-from-nar.html
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.