- This topic has 265 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by drunkle.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 5, 2008 at 12:52 PM #130042January 5, 2008 at 1:28 PM #130018drunkleParticipant
rice:
that was a pretty good rant… never be ashamed of drunken rants. at least, i never am. you shouldn’t have deleted it.
January 5, 2008 at 1:28 PM #130193drunkleParticipantrice:
that was a pretty good rant… never be ashamed of drunken rants. at least, i never am. you shouldn’t have deleted it.
January 5, 2008 at 1:28 PM #130196drunkleParticipantrice:
that was a pretty good rant… never be ashamed of drunken rants. at least, i never am. you shouldn’t have deleted it.
January 5, 2008 at 1:28 PM #130264drunkleParticipantrice:
that was a pretty good rant… never be ashamed of drunken rants. at least, i never am. you shouldn’t have deleted it.
January 5, 2008 at 1:28 PM #130296drunkleParticipantrice:
that was a pretty good rant… never be ashamed of drunken rants. at least, i never am. you shouldn’t have deleted it.
January 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM #130048Sandi EganParticipantRicechex,
Could you please provide specific examples of Internet censorship? With blocked links, screenshots, etc?
January 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM #130223Sandi EganParticipantRicechex,
Could you please provide specific examples of Internet censorship? With blocked links, screenshots, etc?
January 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM #130225Sandi EganParticipantRicechex,
Could you please provide specific examples of Internet censorship? With blocked links, screenshots, etc?
January 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM #130293Sandi EganParticipantRicechex,
Could you please provide specific examples of Internet censorship? With blocked links, screenshots, etc?
January 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM #130326Sandi EganParticipantRicechex,
Could you please provide specific examples of Internet censorship? With blocked links, screenshots, etc?
January 5, 2008 at 3:06 PM #130068ArrayaParticipant“but, i think that attitude is a double edged nuke. assuming that “things will take care of themselves” or that someone (someone else) will “fix it” are not conducive to things getting fixed…”
That is spot on and to make matters worse. The powers that be that are in charge of fixing things do not have our best interest at heart so the problem expotenially grows
January 5, 2008 at 3:06 PM #130243ArrayaParticipant“but, i think that attitude is a double edged nuke. assuming that “things will take care of themselves” or that someone (someone else) will “fix it” are not conducive to things getting fixed…”
That is spot on and to make matters worse. The powers that be that are in charge of fixing things do not have our best interest at heart so the problem expotenially grows
January 5, 2008 at 3:06 PM #130245ArrayaParticipant“but, i think that attitude is a double edged nuke. assuming that “things will take care of themselves” or that someone (someone else) will “fix it” are not conducive to things getting fixed…”
That is spot on and to make matters worse. The powers that be that are in charge of fixing things do not have our best interest at heart so the problem expotenially grows
January 5, 2008 at 3:06 PM #130314ArrayaParticipant“but, i think that attitude is a double edged nuke. assuming that “things will take care of themselves” or that someone (someone else) will “fix it” are not conducive to things getting fixed…”
That is spot on and to make matters worse. The powers that be that are in charge of fixing things do not have our best interest at heart so the problem expotenially grows
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.