- This topic has 70 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 17, 2009 at 4:07 PM #400956May 17, 2009 at 4:10 PM #401196AnonymousGuest
[quote=Rt.66]The Bulldozer operator had jobs in just two places, Victorville and Temecula.
Its not as if we weeded through a bunch of stats to “latch onto” a negative aspect about Temecula.
[/quote]No, but the reporter who put the newspaper article on the front page did just that.
Perhaps the media wasn’t targeting any specific cities, but they were looking for drama. That’s what they sell, and it is clear that some folks are buying it.
There will likely be more homes demolished in Temecula. In wine country there are several incomplete “estate” developments that have failed. Most of these are out of the way and I only know about them because I occasionally ride my bike through the dirt roads in wine country. When the city gets around to condemning them, the story will make the papers.
When this happens, some will point to this news as evidence that Temecula is on the same trajectory as the Salton Sea was in the 1960s. Ho hum.
May 17, 2009 at 4:10 PM #401400AnonymousGuest[quote=Rt.66]The Bulldozer operator had jobs in just two places, Victorville and Temecula.
Its not as if we weeded through a bunch of stats to “latch onto” a negative aspect about Temecula.
[/quote]No, but the reporter who put the newspaper article on the front page did just that.
Perhaps the media wasn’t targeting any specific cities, but they were looking for drama. That’s what they sell, and it is clear that some folks are buying it.
There will likely be more homes demolished in Temecula. In wine country there are several incomplete “estate” developments that have failed. Most of these are out of the way and I only know about them because I occasionally ride my bike through the dirt roads in wine country. When the city gets around to condemning them, the story will make the papers.
When this happens, some will point to this news as evidence that Temecula is on the same trajectory as the Salton Sea was in the 1960s. Ho hum.
May 17, 2009 at 4:10 PM #400962AnonymousGuest[quote=Rt.66]The Bulldozer operator had jobs in just two places, Victorville and Temecula.
Its not as if we weeded through a bunch of stats to “latch onto” a negative aspect about Temecula.
[/quote]No, but the reporter who put the newspaper article on the front page did just that.
Perhaps the media wasn’t targeting any specific cities, but they were looking for drama. That’s what they sell, and it is clear that some folks are buying it.
There will likely be more homes demolished in Temecula. In wine country there are several incomplete “estate” developments that have failed. Most of these are out of the way and I only know about them because I occasionally ride my bike through the dirt roads in wine country. When the city gets around to condemning them, the story will make the papers.
When this happens, some will point to this news as evidence that Temecula is on the same trajectory as the Salton Sea was in the 1960s. Ho hum.
May 17, 2009 at 4:10 PM #400708AnonymousGuest[quote=Rt.66]The Bulldozer operator had jobs in just two places, Victorville and Temecula.
Its not as if we weeded through a bunch of stats to “latch onto” a negative aspect about Temecula.
[/quote]No, but the reporter who put the newspaper article on the front page did just that.
Perhaps the media wasn’t targeting any specific cities, but they were looking for drama. That’s what they sell, and it is clear that some folks are buying it.
There will likely be more homes demolished in Temecula. In wine country there are several incomplete “estate” developments that have failed. Most of these are out of the way and I only know about them because I occasionally ride my bike through the dirt roads in wine country. When the city gets around to condemning them, the story will make the papers.
When this happens, some will point to this news as evidence that Temecula is on the same trajectory as the Salton Sea was in the 1960s. Ho hum.
May 17, 2009 at 4:10 PM #401252AnonymousGuest[quote=Rt.66]The Bulldozer operator had jobs in just two places, Victorville and Temecula.
Its not as if we weeded through a bunch of stats to “latch onto” a negative aspect about Temecula.
[/quote]No, but the reporter who put the newspaper article on the front page did just that.
Perhaps the media wasn’t targeting any specific cities, but they were looking for drama. That’s what they sell, and it is clear that some folks are buying it.
There will likely be more homes demolished in Temecula. In wine country there are several incomplete “estate” developments that have failed. Most of these are out of the way and I only know about them because I occasionally ride my bike through the dirt roads in wine country. When the city gets around to condemning them, the story will make the papers.
When this happens, some will point to this news as evidence that Temecula is on the same trajectory as the Salton Sea was in the 1960s. Ho hum.
May 17, 2009 at 4:26 PM #400723AnonymousGuest[quote=carlsbadworker]I still believe that inflation-adjusted, this won’t be the price bottom…but at the same time, I also start to believe that the worst is really behind us. We will never see the same rate of price decline (30-40% yoy) that we saw in 2008.[/quote]
Agreed. Congrats on your house purchase. If was looking for a home I wouldn’t hesitate to buy right now either. If you plan to live there for the long term, it makes sense.
As an investor, I don’t see any solid cash-flow positive deals out there, so any returns must rely on price appreciation. I agree that the worst declines are over but, without immediate cash-flow, there is seems to be no advantage to buy now vs. a year from now. (Low interest rates could be a justification to invest now, but we are targeting all cash, and even if we financed some portion I don’t think low rates are compelling enough.)
May 17, 2009 at 4:26 PM #400976AnonymousGuest[quote=carlsbadworker]I still believe that inflation-adjusted, this won’t be the price bottom…but at the same time, I also start to believe that the worst is really behind us. We will never see the same rate of price decline (30-40% yoy) that we saw in 2008.[/quote]
Agreed. Congrats on your house purchase. If was looking for a home I wouldn’t hesitate to buy right now either. If you plan to live there for the long term, it makes sense.
As an investor, I don’t see any solid cash-flow positive deals out there, so any returns must rely on price appreciation. I agree that the worst declines are over but, without immediate cash-flow, there is seems to be no advantage to buy now vs. a year from now. (Low interest rates could be a justification to invest now, but we are targeting all cash, and even if we financed some portion I don’t think low rates are compelling enough.)
May 17, 2009 at 4:26 PM #401267AnonymousGuest[quote=carlsbadworker]I still believe that inflation-adjusted, this won’t be the price bottom…but at the same time, I also start to believe that the worst is really behind us. We will never see the same rate of price decline (30-40% yoy) that we saw in 2008.[/quote]
Agreed. Congrats on your house purchase. If was looking for a home I wouldn’t hesitate to buy right now either. If you plan to live there for the long term, it makes sense.
As an investor, I don’t see any solid cash-flow positive deals out there, so any returns must rely on price appreciation. I agree that the worst declines are over but, without immediate cash-flow, there is seems to be no advantage to buy now vs. a year from now. (Low interest rates could be a justification to invest now, but we are targeting all cash, and even if we financed some portion I don’t think low rates are compelling enough.)
May 17, 2009 at 4:26 PM #401211AnonymousGuest[quote=carlsbadworker]I still believe that inflation-adjusted, this won’t be the price bottom…but at the same time, I also start to believe that the worst is really behind us. We will never see the same rate of price decline (30-40% yoy) that we saw in 2008.[/quote]
Agreed. Congrats on your house purchase. If was looking for a home I wouldn’t hesitate to buy right now either. If you plan to live there for the long term, it makes sense.
As an investor, I don’t see any solid cash-flow positive deals out there, so any returns must rely on price appreciation. I agree that the worst declines are over but, without immediate cash-flow, there is seems to be no advantage to buy now vs. a year from now. (Low interest rates could be a justification to invest now, but we are targeting all cash, and even if we financed some portion I don’t think low rates are compelling enough.)
May 17, 2009 at 4:26 PM #401415AnonymousGuest[quote=carlsbadworker]I still believe that inflation-adjusted, this won’t be the price bottom…but at the same time, I also start to believe that the worst is really behind us. We will never see the same rate of price decline (30-40% yoy) that we saw in 2008.[/quote]
Agreed. Congrats on your house purchase. If was looking for a home I wouldn’t hesitate to buy right now either. If you plan to live there for the long term, it makes sense.
As an investor, I don’t see any solid cash-flow positive deals out there, so any returns must rely on price appreciation. I agree that the worst declines are over but, without immediate cash-flow, there is seems to be no advantage to buy now vs. a year from now. (Low interest rates could be a justification to invest now, but we are targeting all cash, and even if we financed some portion I don’t think low rates are compelling enough.)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.