Moving next door

[equalizer]

How about using a plastic reusable mug (sell to customer for cheap) for the drive through instead of a paper cup for 180+ coffee? Simple, cost-effective, eco-friendly, everyone wins except lawyers.

Did you read the part where MDs paid 230,000 to person who suffered burns as a result of an employee spilled the coffee in her car? We are not talk about a burn here. We are talking about 3rd degree burns, go check out the burn ward before you dismiss its hot coffee. Why did Mds pay that much for simple hot coffee?

Why did Mds not settle the case against the 79 year woman for 20K, 150K, 300K who had never filed a lawsuit in her life and not accepted the court mediation offer? The judge offered many chances for a sealed settlement. Looking at case facts one could surmise that they could have hoped they would lose to get lifetime of positive press. Mds won big, they should pay her at least $10M as best PR stunt in world history.

[patientrenter]

So equalizer (and Marion), if an event causes lots of damage, and the person who suffers most from the damage is a sympathetic character, and another (innocent) party is rich and unsympathetic, then there should be a payment from the rich unsympathetic entity to the sympathetic person?

You know those materially poor countries that can’t seem to get their economic act together because their legal system is not based strictly on personal responsibility? Well, there’s no magic reason we couldn’t get there too if we fall too easily for these “big rich corporations vs nice poor people” visions of our society.

Patient renter in OC

[patientrenter]

So equalizer (and Marion), if an event causes lots of damage, and the person who suffers most from the damage is a sympathetic character, and another (innocent) party is rich and unsympathetic, then there should be a payment from the rich unsympathetic entity to the sympathetic person?

You know those materially poor countries that can’t seem to get their economic act together because their legal system is not based strictly on personal responsibility? Well, there’s no magic reason we couldn’t get there too if we fall too easily for these “big rich corporations vs nice poor people” visions of our society.

Patient renter in OC

[patientrenter]

So equalizer (and Marion), if an event causes lots of damage, and the person who suffers most from the damage is a sympathetic character, and another (innocent) party is rich and unsympathetic, then there should be a payment from the rich unsympathetic entity to the sympathetic person?

You know those materially poor countries that can’t seem to get their economic act together because their legal system is not based strictly on personal responsibility? Well, there’s no magic reason we couldn’t get there too if we fall too easily for these “big rich corporations vs nice poor people” visions of our society.

Patient renter in OC

[patientrenter]

So equalizer (and Marion), if an event causes lots of damage, and the person who suffers most from the damage is a sympathetic character, and another (innocent) party is rich and unsympathetic, then there should be a payment from the rich unsympathetic entity to the sympathetic person?

You know those materially poor countries that can’t seem to get their economic act together because their legal system is not based strictly on personal responsibility? Well, there’s no magic reason we couldn’t get there too if we fall too easily for these “big rich corporations vs nice poor people” visions of our society.

Patient renter in OC

[patientrenter]

So equalizer (and Marion), if an event causes lots of damage, and the person who suffers most from the damage is a sympathetic character, and another (innocent) party is rich and unsympathetic, then there should be a payment from the rich unsympathetic entity to the sympathetic person?

You know those materially poor countries that can’t seem to get their economic act together because their legal system is not based strictly on personal responsibility? Well, there’s no magic reason we couldn’t get there too if we fall too easily for these “big rich corporations vs nice poor people” visions of our society.

Patient renter in OC

[paramount]

My neighbor just bought a new house, he will rent his current house out.

But, if he is unable to rent his old house out (for a reasonable amount), he will let it go.

They are in their new house, the old house is now secondary.

[paramount]

My neighbor just bought a new house, he will rent his current house out.

But, if he is unable to rent his old house out (for a reasonable amount), he will let it go.

They are in their new house, the old house is now secondary.

[paramount]

My neighbor just bought a new house, he will rent his current house out.

But, if he is unable to rent his old house out (for a reasonable amount), he will let it go.

They are in their new house, the old house is now secondary.

[paramount]

My neighbor just bought a new house, he will rent his current house out.

But, if he is unable to rent his old house out (for a reasonable amount), he will let it go.

They are in their new house, the old house is now secondary.

[paramount]

My neighbor just bought a new house, he will rent his current house out.

But, if he is unable to rent his old house out (for a reasonable amount), he will let it go.

They are in their new house, the old house is now secondary.

[equalizer]

What kind of loan did your friend get and what kind of payments on old and new? I know some here will call it fraud and breach of contract, etc, etc, but as long as they didnt committ fraud where is the issue? If you cant, dont pay your loan, contract specifies the remedies. Its amazing that people here cry for the banks under the personal responsibility guise. If the lawyers for the bank are too STUPID to write in proper clauses, why should we cry for the banks. They know how to write 30% APR for credit cards.

[equalizer]

What kind of loan did your friend get and what kind of payments on old and new? I know some here will call it fraud and breach of contract, etc, etc, but as long as they didnt committ fraud where is the issue? If you cant, dont pay your loan, contract specifies the remedies. Its amazing that people here cry for the banks under the personal responsibility guise. If the lawyers for the bank are too STUPID to write in proper clauses, why should we cry for the banks. They know how to write 30% APR for credit cards.

[equalizer]

What kind of loan did your friend get and what kind of payments on old and new? I know some here will call it fraud and breach of contract, etc, etc, but as long as they didnt committ fraud where is the issue? If you cant, dont pay your loan, contract specifies the remedies. Its amazing that people here cry for the banks under the personal responsibility guise. If the lawyers for the bank are too STUPID to write in proper clauses, why should we cry for the banks. They know how to write 30% APR for credit cards.

[equalizer]

What kind of loan did your friend get and what kind of payments on old and new? I know some here will call it fraud and breach of contract, etc, etc, but as long as they didnt committ fraud where is the issue? If you cant, dont pay your loan, contract specifies the remedies. Its amazing that people here cry for the banks under the personal responsibility guise. If the lawyers for the bank are too STUPID to write in proper clauses, why should we cry for the banks. They know how to write 30% APR for credit cards.

[Author]

Posts