Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Mortgage Deduction Looks Less Sacred
- This topic has 90 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by garysears.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 27, 2009 at 9:11 PM #357170February 27, 2009 at 9:21 PM #357477jpinpbParticipant
I believe this will definitely affect the mindset of many. Remember in the ’90’s when Clinton gave the 250k tax break on capital gains. That’s what was the first shot in the arm for real estate. I just wonder if this will reverse it.
Enacting a law like this makes a difference when rent is still lower than a mortgage. Sometimes when it’s close, but you have a write-off, you think about buying to even it out.
February 27, 2009 at 9:21 PM #356897jpinpbParticipantI believe this will definitely affect the mindset of many. Remember in the ’90’s when Clinton gave the 250k tax break on capital gains. That’s what was the first shot in the arm for real estate. I just wonder if this will reverse it.
Enacting a law like this makes a difference when rent is still lower than a mortgage. Sometimes when it’s close, but you have a write-off, you think about buying to even it out.
February 27, 2009 at 9:21 PM #357200jpinpbParticipantI believe this will definitely affect the mindset of many. Remember in the ’90’s when Clinton gave the 250k tax break on capital gains. That’s what was the first shot in the arm for real estate. I just wonder if this will reverse it.
Enacting a law like this makes a difference when rent is still lower than a mortgage. Sometimes when it’s close, but you have a write-off, you think about buying to even it out.
February 27, 2009 at 9:21 PM #357338jpinpbParticipantI believe this will definitely affect the mindset of many. Remember in the ’90’s when Clinton gave the 250k tax break on capital gains. That’s what was the first shot in the arm for real estate. I just wonder if this will reverse it.
Enacting a law like this makes a difference when rent is still lower than a mortgage. Sometimes when it’s close, but you have a write-off, you think about buying to even it out.
February 27, 2009 at 9:21 PM #357366jpinpbParticipantI believe this will definitely affect the mindset of many. Remember in the ’90’s when Clinton gave the 250k tax break on capital gains. That’s what was the first shot in the arm for real estate. I just wonder if this will reverse it.
Enacting a law like this makes a difference when rent is still lower than a mortgage. Sometimes when it’s close, but you have a write-off, you think about buying to even it out.
February 28, 2009 at 9:02 AM #357583jficquetteParticipantThe deduction will go away because 80% of people who vote democratic don’t pay any Federal Income tax and the mortgage deduction is useless to them.
February 28, 2009 at 9:02 AM #357142jficquetteParticipantThe deduction will go away because 80% of people who vote democratic don’t pay any Federal Income tax and the mortgage deduction is useless to them.
February 28, 2009 at 9:02 AM #357613jficquetteParticipantThe deduction will go away because 80% of people who vote democratic don’t pay any Federal Income tax and the mortgage deduction is useless to them.
February 28, 2009 at 9:02 AM #357721jficquetteParticipantThe deduction will go away because 80% of people who vote democratic don’t pay any Federal Income tax and the mortgage deduction is useless to them.
February 28, 2009 at 9:02 AM #357444jficquetteParticipantThe deduction will go away because 80% of people who vote democratic don’t pay any Federal Income tax and the mortgage deduction is useless to them.
February 28, 2009 at 9:11 AM #357588jpinpbParticipantWell, a Dem passed the no capital gains tax when selling a house earning 250k individual 500k married. Why pass a law like that if you don’t pay taxes anyway.
When I had my house, I used the write-off. That isn’t a reason for me to buy one, especially when I’m living in an area I want to buy in and my rent is almost 1/2 what it would cost me to buy in my very complex – and still barely close w/a write-off.
But as I said, many people tout the benefits of write-off when buying, so this is going to shut some people up about it and others will reconsider that factor.
February 28, 2009 at 9:11 AM #357618jpinpbParticipantWell, a Dem passed the no capital gains tax when selling a house earning 250k individual 500k married. Why pass a law like that if you don’t pay taxes anyway.
When I had my house, I used the write-off. That isn’t a reason for me to buy one, especially when I’m living in an area I want to buy in and my rent is almost 1/2 what it would cost me to buy in my very complex – and still barely close w/a write-off.
But as I said, many people tout the benefits of write-off when buying, so this is going to shut some people up about it and others will reconsider that factor.
February 28, 2009 at 9:11 AM #357726jpinpbParticipantWell, a Dem passed the no capital gains tax when selling a house earning 250k individual 500k married. Why pass a law like that if you don’t pay taxes anyway.
When I had my house, I used the write-off. That isn’t a reason for me to buy one, especially when I’m living in an area I want to buy in and my rent is almost 1/2 what it would cost me to buy in my very complex – and still barely close w/a write-off.
But as I said, many people tout the benefits of write-off when buying, so this is going to shut some people up about it and others will reconsider that factor.
February 28, 2009 at 9:11 AM #357449jpinpbParticipantWell, a Dem passed the no capital gains tax when selling a house earning 250k individual 500k married. Why pass a law like that if you don’t pay taxes anyway.
When I had my house, I used the write-off. That isn’t a reason for me to buy one, especially when I’m living in an area I want to buy in and my rent is almost 1/2 what it would cost me to buy in my very complex – and still barely close w/a write-off.
But as I said, many people tout the benefits of write-off when buying, so this is going to shut some people up about it and others will reconsider that factor.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.