- This topic has 435 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 30, 2009 at 7:16 PM #391306April 30, 2009 at 7:22 PM #390651
danthedart
ParticipantWhose fault is it if they accept a sub-optimal offer? It is the agents fault. The listing agent has a contract with the seller to present all offers, to market the property etc. If the agent did not fulfill his/her end of the contract, that’s unethical. Its even more unethical if the agent does not fulfill the contract for personal gain.
Yes we all have different ethical standards, so you have a right to say that my ethical standards are not yours.
So just say that, but don’t say that I’m hypocritical or that if I were the buyer I would think differently.
The fact remains that I would not think differently about this situation if I were the buyer.
April 30, 2009 at 7:22 PM #390914danthedart
ParticipantWhose fault is it if they accept a sub-optimal offer? It is the agents fault. The listing agent has a contract with the seller to present all offers, to market the property etc. If the agent did not fulfill his/her end of the contract, that’s unethical. Its even more unethical if the agent does not fulfill the contract for personal gain.
Yes we all have different ethical standards, so you have a right to say that my ethical standards are not yours.
So just say that, but don’t say that I’m hypocritical or that if I were the buyer I would think differently.
The fact remains that I would not think differently about this situation if I were the buyer.
April 30, 2009 at 7:22 PM #391122danthedart
ParticipantWhose fault is it if they accept a sub-optimal offer? It is the agents fault. The listing agent has a contract with the seller to present all offers, to market the property etc. If the agent did not fulfill his/her end of the contract, that’s unethical. Its even more unethical if the agent does not fulfill the contract for personal gain.
Yes we all have different ethical standards, so you have a right to say that my ethical standards are not yours.
So just say that, but don’t say that I’m hypocritical or that if I were the buyer I would think differently.
The fact remains that I would not think differently about this situation if I were the buyer.
April 30, 2009 at 7:22 PM #391174danthedart
ParticipantWhose fault is it if they accept a sub-optimal offer? It is the agents fault. The listing agent has a contract with the seller to present all offers, to market the property etc. If the agent did not fulfill his/her end of the contract, that’s unethical. Its even more unethical if the agent does not fulfill the contract for personal gain.
Yes we all have different ethical standards, so you have a right to say that my ethical standards are not yours.
So just say that, but don’t say that I’m hypocritical or that if I were the buyer I would think differently.
The fact remains that I would not think differently about this situation if I were the buyer.
April 30, 2009 at 7:22 PM #391316danthedart
ParticipantWhose fault is it if they accept a sub-optimal offer? It is the agents fault. The listing agent has a contract with the seller to present all offers, to market the property etc. If the agent did not fulfill his/her end of the contract, that’s unethical. Its even more unethical if the agent does not fulfill the contract for personal gain.
Yes we all have different ethical standards, so you have a right to say that my ethical standards are not yours.
So just say that, but don’t say that I’m hypocritical or that if I were the buyer I would think differently.
The fact remains that I would not think differently about this situation if I were the buyer.
April 30, 2009 at 7:35 PM #390656jimg111
ParticipantThat’s just not correct Dan, if the seller agrees to accept the first offer that meets terms that are acceptable and then instructs the agent that they do not want any more offers, then how is that the agent’s fault? This does happen on some listings.
April 30, 2009 at 7:35 PM #390919jimg111
ParticipantThat’s just not correct Dan, if the seller agrees to accept the first offer that meets terms that are acceptable and then instructs the agent that they do not want any more offers, then how is that the agent’s fault? This does happen on some listings.
April 30, 2009 at 7:35 PM #391127jimg111
ParticipantThat’s just not correct Dan, if the seller agrees to accept the first offer that meets terms that are acceptable and then instructs the agent that they do not want any more offers, then how is that the agent’s fault? This does happen on some listings.
April 30, 2009 at 7:35 PM #391178jimg111
ParticipantThat’s just not correct Dan, if the seller agrees to accept the first offer that meets terms that are acceptable and then instructs the agent that they do not want any more offers, then how is that the agent’s fault? This does happen on some listings.
April 30, 2009 at 7:35 PM #391321jimg111
ParticipantThat’s just not correct Dan, if the seller agrees to accept the first offer that meets terms that are acceptable and then instructs the agent that they do not want any more offers, then how is that the agent’s fault? This does happen on some listings.
April 30, 2009 at 7:42 PM #390666an
ParticipantIf you’re willing to pass up on a great deal because you deem the deal to be unethical would definitely make you more virtuous than most of us.
April 30, 2009 at 7:42 PM #390929an
ParticipantIf you’re willing to pass up on a great deal because you deem the deal to be unethical would definitely make you more virtuous than most of us.
April 30, 2009 at 7:42 PM #391137an
ParticipantIf you’re willing to pass up on a great deal because you deem the deal to be unethical would definitely make you more virtuous than most of us.
April 30, 2009 at 7:42 PM #391188an
ParticipantIf you’re willing to pass up on a great deal because you deem the deal to be unethical would definitely make you more virtuous than most of us.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.