- This topic has 435 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 29, 2009 at 11:21 PM #15577April 29, 2009 at 11:35 PM #389966
NotCranky
ParticipantMaybe flipping it in escrow? Do you know if anyone can pull that off with bank owned? I think it is supposed to be blocked by “no assigning of contracts” provisions. It’s probably not this?
April 29, 2009 at 11:35 PM #390230NotCranky
ParticipantMaybe flipping it in escrow? Do you know if anyone can pull that off with bank owned? I think it is supposed to be blocked by “no assigning of contracts” provisions. It’s probably not this?
April 29, 2009 at 11:35 PM #390437NotCranky
ParticipantMaybe flipping it in escrow? Do you know if anyone can pull that off with bank owned? I think it is supposed to be blocked by “no assigning of contracts” provisions. It’s probably not this?
April 29, 2009 at 11:35 PM #390488NotCranky
ParticipantMaybe flipping it in escrow? Do you know if anyone can pull that off with bank owned? I think it is supposed to be blocked by “no assigning of contracts” provisions. It’s probably not this?
April 29, 2009 at 11:35 PM #390628NotCranky
ParticipantMaybe flipping it in escrow? Do you know if anyone can pull that off with bank owned? I think it is supposed to be blocked by “no assigning of contracts” provisions. It’s probably not this?
April 29, 2009 at 11:48 PM #389981SD Realtor
ParticipantNo not flipped in escrow. The properties were basically reo homes that went from active to pending status immediately upon being put on the mls. My first suspicion was that they were all in house deals where the listing agents simply did both sides of the deal.
In my opinion it would seem that the agents did not make much effort to get the best offer for the properties.
April 29, 2009 at 11:48 PM #390245SD Realtor
ParticipantNo not flipped in escrow. The properties were basically reo homes that went from active to pending status immediately upon being put on the mls. My first suspicion was that they were all in house deals where the listing agents simply did both sides of the deal.
In my opinion it would seem that the agents did not make much effort to get the best offer for the properties.
April 29, 2009 at 11:48 PM #390452SD Realtor
ParticipantNo not flipped in escrow. The properties were basically reo homes that went from active to pending status immediately upon being put on the mls. My first suspicion was that they were all in house deals where the listing agents simply did both sides of the deal.
In my opinion it would seem that the agents did not make much effort to get the best offer for the properties.
April 29, 2009 at 11:48 PM #390503SD Realtor
ParticipantNo not flipped in escrow. The properties were basically reo homes that went from active to pending status immediately upon being put on the mls. My first suspicion was that they were all in house deals where the listing agents simply did both sides of the deal.
In my opinion it would seem that the agents did not make much effort to get the best offer for the properties.
April 29, 2009 at 11:48 PM #390643SD Realtor
ParticipantNo not flipped in escrow. The properties were basically reo homes that went from active to pending status immediately upon being put on the mls. My first suspicion was that they were all in house deals where the listing agents simply did both sides of the deal.
In my opinion it would seem that the agents did not make much effort to get the best offer for the properties.
April 30, 2009 at 12:56 AM #390041CA renter
ParticipantYet another example of why we need that public auction site.
The plot thickens… 😉
April 30, 2009 at 12:56 AM #390305CA renter
ParticipantYet another example of why we need that public auction site.
The plot thickens… 😉
April 30, 2009 at 12:56 AM #390512CA renter
ParticipantYet another example of why we need that public auction site.
The plot thickens… 😉
April 30, 2009 at 12:56 AM #390562CA renter
ParticipantYet another example of why we need that public auction site.
The plot thickens… 😉
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.