Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Mission Hills: Low End Trends
- This topic has 430 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by
pemeliza.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 28, 2011 at 5:43 PM #673224March 1, 2011 at 12:03 AM #672164
CA renter
Participant[quote=jpinpb]All I can say is there were a few naysayers on SDL that scoffed at the idea of 92103 and 92106 declining in price and certainly not 30+%, particularly since there were so few NODs. And frankly, as I admit, with the demographics for those ZIPs, I’m surprised. Old money in both ZIPs and many physicians in 92103. I think there is more to come in that ZIP. There are some NODs that are unresolved.
Edit: Here’s one that’s been languishing and going back and forth between NODs and foreclosure dates being batted around. 2174 Guy. It’s not listed any more. Giving me time to get those 6 magical numbers so I can buy it ;)[/quote]When we hit the lottery, we’ll go in with you on this one. 🙂
March 1, 2011 at 12:03 AM #672226Participant[quote=jpinpb]All I can say is there were a few naysayers on SDL that scoffed at the idea of 92103 and 92106 declining in price and certainly not 30+%, particularly since there were so few NODs. And frankly, as I admit, with the demographics for those ZIPs, I’m surprised. Old money in both ZIPs and many physicians in 92103. I think there is more to come in that ZIP. There are some NODs that are unresolved.
Edit: Here’s one that’s been languishing and going back and forth between NODs and foreclosure dates being batted around. 2174 Guy. It’s not listed any more. Giving me time to get those 6 magical numbers so I can buy it ;)[/quote]When we hit the lottery, we’ll go in with you on this one. 🙂
March 1, 2011 at 12:03 AM #672834Participant[quote=jpinpb]All I can say is there were a few naysayers on SDL that scoffed at the idea of 92103 and 92106 declining in price and certainly not 30+%, particularly since there were so few NODs. And frankly, as I admit, with the demographics for those ZIPs, I’m surprised. Old money in both ZIPs and many physicians in 92103. I think there is more to come in that ZIP. There are some NODs that are unresolved.
Edit: Here’s one that’s been languishing and going back and forth between NODs and foreclosure dates being batted around. 2174 Guy. It’s not listed any more. Giving me time to get those 6 magical numbers so I can buy it ;)[/quote]When we hit the lottery, we’ll go in with you on this one. 🙂
March 1, 2011 at 12:03 AM #672973Participant[quote=jpinpb]All I can say is there were a few naysayers on SDL that scoffed at the idea of 92103 and 92106 declining in price and certainly not 30+%, particularly since there were so few NODs. And frankly, as I admit, with the demographics for those ZIPs, I’m surprised. Old money in both ZIPs and many physicians in 92103. I think there is more to come in that ZIP. There are some NODs that are unresolved.
Edit: Here’s one that’s been languishing and going back and forth between NODs and foreclosure dates being batted around. 2174 Guy. It’s not listed any more. Giving me time to get those 6 magical numbers so I can buy it ;)[/quote]When we hit the lottery, we’ll go in with you on this one. 🙂
March 1, 2011 at 12:03 AM #673320Participant[quote=jpinpb]All I can say is there were a few naysayers on SDL that scoffed at the idea of 92103 and 92106 declining in price and certainly not 30+%, particularly since there were so few NODs. And frankly, as I admit, with the demographics for those ZIPs, I’m surprised. Old money in both ZIPs and many physicians in 92103. I think there is more to come in that ZIP. There are some NODs that are unresolved.
Edit: Here’s one that’s been languishing and going back and forth between NODs and foreclosure dates being batted around. 2174 Guy. It’s not listed any more. Giving me time to get those 6 magical numbers so I can buy it ;)[/quote]When we hit the lottery, we’ll go in with you on this one. 🙂
March 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM #674583jpinpb
ParticipantI mentioned on the Point Loma thread how I’m surprised at the 30% off we’ve been seeing lately unexpectedly in certain areas that were once thought healthy, despite all the government intervention. And even though this is occuring, there is still chatter that we are at bottom. Totally ignoring the stealth that’s out there, the NODs that continue and the foreclosures that are just twisting in the wind.
I’m a homeowner now and it would be nice to believe we are at bottom. But it just seems to fly in the face of reality. I would have to be in denial. Just today as I was looking I stumbled upon this 2105 W California. According to Redfin, it is bank owned as of May 2010. It went back to bene at basically 2004 pricing. It still is not listed.
March 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM #674640ParticipantI mentioned on the Point Loma thread how I’m surprised at the 30% off we’ve been seeing lately unexpectedly in certain areas that were once thought healthy, despite all the government intervention. And even though this is occuring, there is still chatter that we are at bottom. Totally ignoring the stealth that’s out there, the NODs that continue and the foreclosures that are just twisting in the wind.
I’m a homeowner now and it would be nice to believe we are at bottom. But it just seems to fly in the face of reality. I would have to be in denial. Just today as I was looking I stumbled upon this 2105 W California. According to Redfin, it is bank owned as of May 2010. It went back to bene at basically 2004 pricing. It still is not listed.
March 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM #675254ParticipantI mentioned on the Point Loma thread how I’m surprised at the 30% off we’ve been seeing lately unexpectedly in certain areas that were once thought healthy, despite all the government intervention. And even though this is occuring, there is still chatter that we are at bottom. Totally ignoring the stealth that’s out there, the NODs that continue and the foreclosures that are just twisting in the wind.
I’m a homeowner now and it would be nice to believe we are at bottom. But it just seems to fly in the face of reality. I would have to be in denial. Just today as I was looking I stumbled upon this 2105 W California. According to Redfin, it is bank owned as of May 2010. It went back to bene at basically 2004 pricing. It still is not listed.
March 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM #675390ParticipantI mentioned on the Point Loma thread how I’m surprised at the 30% off we’ve been seeing lately unexpectedly in certain areas that were once thought healthy, despite all the government intervention. And even though this is occuring, there is still chatter that we are at bottom. Totally ignoring the stealth that’s out there, the NODs that continue and the foreclosures that are just twisting in the wind.
I’m a homeowner now and it would be nice to believe we are at bottom. But it just seems to fly in the face of reality. I would have to be in denial. Just today as I was looking I stumbled upon this 2105 W California. According to Redfin, it is bank owned as of May 2010. It went back to bene at basically 2004 pricing. It still is not listed.
March 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM #675737ParticipantI mentioned on the Point Loma thread how I’m surprised at the 30% off we’ve been seeing lately unexpectedly in certain areas that were once thought healthy, despite all the government intervention. And even though this is occuring, there is still chatter that we are at bottom. Totally ignoring the stealth that’s out there, the NODs that continue and the foreclosures that are just twisting in the wind.
I’m a homeowner now and it would be nice to believe we are at bottom. But it just seems to fly in the face of reality. I would have to be in denial. Just today as I was looking I stumbled upon this 2105 W California. According to Redfin, it is bank owned as of May 2010. It went back to bene at basically 2004 pricing. It still is not listed.
March 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM #674643bearishgurl
Participant[quote=jpinpb] . . . Just today as I was looking I stumbled upon this 2105 W California. According to Redfin, it is bank owned as of May 2010. It went back to bene at basically 2004 pricing. It still is not listed.[/quote]
It’s possible that there are foundation, land subsidence or mold problems in the crawlspace with it and the lender (on the east coast?) hasn’t quite figured out what to do about this yet. Just my guess, having knowledge of this area.
March 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM #674700Participant[quote=jpinpb] . . . Just today as I was looking I stumbled upon this 2105 W California. According to Redfin, it is bank owned as of May 2010. It went back to bene at basically 2004 pricing. It still is not listed.[/quote]
It’s possible that there are foundation, land subsidence or mold problems in the crawlspace with it and the lender (on the east coast?) hasn’t quite figured out what to do about this yet. Just my guess, having knowledge of this area.
March 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM #675314Participant[quote=jpinpb] . . . Just today as I was looking I stumbled upon this 2105 W California. According to Redfin, it is bank owned as of May 2010. It went back to bene at basically 2004 pricing. It still is not listed.[/quote]
It’s possible that there are foundation, land subsidence or mold problems in the crawlspace with it and the lender (on the east coast?) hasn’t quite figured out what to do about this yet. Just my guess, having knowledge of this area.
March 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM #675450Participant[quote=jpinpb] . . . Just today as I was looking I stumbled upon this 2105 W California. According to Redfin, it is bank owned as of May 2010. It went back to bene at basically 2004 pricing. It still is not listed.[/quote]
It’s possible that there are foundation, land subsidence or mold problems in the crawlspace with it and the lender (on the east coast?) hasn’t quite figured out what to do about this yet. Just my guess, having knowledge of this area.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.