Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Mira Mesa, Calle Cristobal house for under $500K
- This topic has 206 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by jimmyle.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 25, 2008 at 11:50 PM #160395February 26, 2008 at 12:05 AM #160006masayakoParticipant
+1 exactly what I am planning to say… thanks esmith.
Lots in MM are generally small.
February 26, 2008 at 12:05 AM #160303masayakoParticipant+1 exactly what I am planning to say… thanks esmith.
Lots in MM are generally small.
February 26, 2008 at 12:05 AM #160319masayakoParticipant+1 exactly what I am planning to say… thanks esmith.
Lots in MM are generally small.
February 26, 2008 at 12:05 AM #160322masayakoParticipant+1 exactly what I am planning to say… thanks esmith.
Lots in MM are generally small.
February 26, 2008 at 12:05 AM #160400masayakoParticipant+1 exactly what I am planning to say… thanks esmith.
Lots in MM are generally small.
February 26, 2008 at 12:49 AM #160032EugeneParticipantCalle Cristobal area, especially its westernmost part (92121 zip code), should be supported by its proximity to CV.
Sure CV has slightly better schools but 200k+ price differential between 3/2 1600 sf’s on opposite sides of the canyon can’t hold for long. And there are way more houses in CV than along Calle Cristobal.
February 26, 2008 at 12:49 AM #160328EugeneParticipantCalle Cristobal area, especially its westernmost part (92121 zip code), should be supported by its proximity to CV.
Sure CV has slightly better schools but 200k+ price differential between 3/2 1600 sf’s on opposite sides of the canyon can’t hold for long. And there are way more houses in CV than along Calle Cristobal.
February 26, 2008 at 12:49 AM #160344EugeneParticipantCalle Cristobal area, especially its westernmost part (92121 zip code), should be supported by its proximity to CV.
Sure CV has slightly better schools but 200k+ price differential between 3/2 1600 sf’s on opposite sides of the canyon can’t hold for long. And there are way more houses in CV than along Calle Cristobal.
February 26, 2008 at 12:49 AM #160347EugeneParticipantCalle Cristobal area, especially its westernmost part (92121 zip code), should be supported by its proximity to CV.
Sure CV has slightly better schools but 200k+ price differential between 3/2 1600 sf’s on opposite sides of the canyon can’t hold for long. And there are way more houses in CV than along Calle Cristobal.
February 26, 2008 at 12:49 AM #160425EugeneParticipantCalle Cristobal area, especially its westernmost part (92121 zip code), should be supported by its proximity to CV.
Sure CV has slightly better schools but 200k+ price differential between 3/2 1600 sf’s on opposite sides of the canyon can’t hold for long. And there are way more houses in CV than along Calle Cristobal.
February 26, 2008 at 12:58 AM #160037anParticipantDWCAP, I think your calculation is a little off. A $260k loan w/ 6.25% rate @ 30 year fixed should yield P&I of $1600/month. With 20% down, you’re looking at payment of $1280/month. As you said, a typical 3/2 will rent for around $1800/month.
I agree on the typical renters in this area, but I don’t agree on the 125X rent multiple. It does not take mortgage rate into consideration. One example is at the bottom of last cycle around 1997ish (which now looking back, put prices at undervalued), a typical rent for a 3/2 in MM run for about $1200/month. The price of such homes were around $160k-ish. But interest rates were around 9%. $160k @ 9% over 30 years would be around $1300/month mortgage. Today, such house would rent for around $1800/month. So to keep the rent vs monthly mortgage similar to the bottom of last cycle (which is 10% > rent), you’re looking at house price of around $320k, not $260k you suggested or even $200k if you use the 125X multiple.
Regarding lot size, I don’t think it’s that small when you take into consideration the size of the house. The typical lot is around 5000 sq-ft with houses around 1400 sq-ft. I’ve seen plenty of houses in CV, 4S, PQ, RB, etc, that have lot size around 5000-6000 sq-ft but squeezed houses 2-3X the size.
February 26, 2008 at 12:58 AM #160333anParticipantDWCAP, I think your calculation is a little off. A $260k loan w/ 6.25% rate @ 30 year fixed should yield P&I of $1600/month. With 20% down, you’re looking at payment of $1280/month. As you said, a typical 3/2 will rent for around $1800/month.
I agree on the typical renters in this area, but I don’t agree on the 125X rent multiple. It does not take mortgage rate into consideration. One example is at the bottom of last cycle around 1997ish (which now looking back, put prices at undervalued), a typical rent for a 3/2 in MM run for about $1200/month. The price of such homes were around $160k-ish. But interest rates were around 9%. $160k @ 9% over 30 years would be around $1300/month mortgage. Today, such house would rent for around $1800/month. So to keep the rent vs monthly mortgage similar to the bottom of last cycle (which is 10% > rent), you’re looking at house price of around $320k, not $260k you suggested or even $200k if you use the 125X multiple.
Regarding lot size, I don’t think it’s that small when you take into consideration the size of the house. The typical lot is around 5000 sq-ft with houses around 1400 sq-ft. I’ve seen plenty of houses in CV, 4S, PQ, RB, etc, that have lot size around 5000-6000 sq-ft but squeezed houses 2-3X the size.
February 26, 2008 at 12:58 AM #160349anParticipantDWCAP, I think your calculation is a little off. A $260k loan w/ 6.25% rate @ 30 year fixed should yield P&I of $1600/month. With 20% down, you’re looking at payment of $1280/month. As you said, a typical 3/2 will rent for around $1800/month.
I agree on the typical renters in this area, but I don’t agree on the 125X rent multiple. It does not take mortgage rate into consideration. One example is at the bottom of last cycle around 1997ish (which now looking back, put prices at undervalued), a typical rent for a 3/2 in MM run for about $1200/month. The price of such homes were around $160k-ish. But interest rates were around 9%. $160k @ 9% over 30 years would be around $1300/month mortgage. Today, such house would rent for around $1800/month. So to keep the rent vs monthly mortgage similar to the bottom of last cycle (which is 10% > rent), you’re looking at house price of around $320k, not $260k you suggested or even $200k if you use the 125X multiple.
Regarding lot size, I don’t think it’s that small when you take into consideration the size of the house. The typical lot is around 5000 sq-ft with houses around 1400 sq-ft. I’ve seen plenty of houses in CV, 4S, PQ, RB, etc, that have lot size around 5000-6000 sq-ft but squeezed houses 2-3X the size.
February 26, 2008 at 12:58 AM #160352anParticipantDWCAP, I think your calculation is a little off. A $260k loan w/ 6.25% rate @ 30 year fixed should yield P&I of $1600/month. With 20% down, you’re looking at payment of $1280/month. As you said, a typical 3/2 will rent for around $1800/month.
I agree on the typical renters in this area, but I don’t agree on the 125X rent multiple. It does not take mortgage rate into consideration. One example is at the bottom of last cycle around 1997ish (which now looking back, put prices at undervalued), a typical rent for a 3/2 in MM run for about $1200/month. The price of such homes were around $160k-ish. But interest rates were around 9%. $160k @ 9% over 30 years would be around $1300/month mortgage. Today, such house would rent for around $1800/month. So to keep the rent vs monthly mortgage similar to the bottom of last cycle (which is 10% > rent), you’re looking at house price of around $320k, not $260k you suggested or even $200k if you use the 125X multiple.
Regarding lot size, I don’t think it’s that small when you take into consideration the size of the house. The typical lot is around 5000 sq-ft with houses around 1400 sq-ft. I’ve seen plenty of houses in CV, 4S, PQ, RB, etc, that have lot size around 5000-6000 sq-ft but squeezed houses 2-3X the size.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.