- This topic has 105 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by wannabe2077.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 1, 2009 at 8:04 PM #322966January 1, 2009 at 10:02 PM #322494afx114Participant
[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]though opensource is overrated. Without proper documentation/support, it costs an arm and a leg in time.
[/quote]I disagree. The beauty of open source is that more times than not, the only “documentation” you need is Teh Googles.
January 1, 2009 at 10:02 PM #322839afx114Participant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]though opensource is overrated. Without proper documentation/support, it costs an arm and a leg in time.
[/quote]I disagree. The beauty of open source is that more times than not, the only “documentation” you need is Teh Googles.
January 1, 2009 at 10:02 PM #322900afx114Participant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]though opensource is overrated. Without proper documentation/support, it costs an arm and a leg in time.
[/quote]I disagree. The beauty of open source is that more times than not, the only “documentation” you need is Teh Googles.
January 1, 2009 at 10:02 PM #322916afx114Participant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]though opensource is overrated. Without proper documentation/support, it costs an arm and a leg in time.
[/quote]I disagree. The beauty of open source is that more times than not, the only “documentation” you need is Teh Googles.
January 1, 2009 at 10:02 PM #322997afx114Participant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]though opensource is overrated. Without proper documentation/support, it costs an arm and a leg in time.
[/quote]I disagree. The beauty of open source is that more times than not, the only “documentation” you need is Teh Googles.
January 2, 2009 at 1:41 AM #322514wannabe2077ParticipantMy experiences with open source are mixed. Open source worked for me – Apache. Emebedded Linux was another story.
I utterly dislike OpenOffice. With all its defects Office 2003 is way superior to it.
January 2, 2009 at 1:41 AM #322860wannabe2077ParticipantMy experiences with open source are mixed. Open source worked for me – Apache. Emebedded Linux was another story.
I utterly dislike OpenOffice. With all its defects Office 2003 is way superior to it.
January 2, 2009 at 1:41 AM #322920wannabe2077ParticipantMy experiences with open source are mixed. Open source worked for me – Apache. Emebedded Linux was another story.
I utterly dislike OpenOffice. With all its defects Office 2003 is way superior to it.
January 2, 2009 at 1:41 AM #322936wannabe2077ParticipantMy experiences with open source are mixed. Open source worked for me – Apache. Emebedded Linux was another story.
I utterly dislike OpenOffice. With all its defects Office 2003 is way superior to it.
January 2, 2009 at 1:41 AM #323016wannabe2077ParticipantMy experiences with open source are mixed. Open source worked for me – Apache. Emebedded Linux was another story.
I utterly dislike OpenOffice. With all its defects Office 2003 is way superior to it.
January 22, 2009 at 6:24 AM #332925TheBreezeParticipantMicrosoft to cut 5,000:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Microsoft-to-slash-5000-jobs-apf-14125847.html
Rumor has it that even larger layoffs were discussed but they decided against it.
January 22, 2009 at 6:24 AM #333259TheBreezeParticipantMicrosoft to cut 5,000:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Microsoft-to-slash-5000-jobs-apf-14125847.html
Rumor has it that even larger layoffs were discussed but they decided against it.
January 22, 2009 at 6:24 AM #333342TheBreezeParticipantMicrosoft to cut 5,000:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Microsoft-to-slash-5000-jobs-apf-14125847.html
Rumor has it that even larger layoffs were discussed but they decided against it.
January 22, 2009 at 6:24 AM #333369TheBreezeParticipantMicrosoft to cut 5,000:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Microsoft-to-slash-5000-jobs-apf-14125847.html
Rumor has it that even larger layoffs were discussed but they decided against it.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.