- This topic has 200 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by
Huckleberry.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 8, 2008 at 3:19 PM #283817October 8, 2008 at 3:25 PM #283483
an
Participant[quote=cooprider]McBama is a joke.
It’s only a matter of time before a legitimate 3rd party rises up. Why not start voting for it now?
Given the choice of Obama or McCain could there be a better time to vote for a 3rd party?
That’s where my vote will go.[/quote]
Totally agree, that’s where my vote will go too.October 8, 2008 at 3:25 PM #283768Participant[quote=cooprider]McBama is a joke.
It’s only a matter of time before a legitimate 3rd party rises up. Why not start voting for it now?
Given the choice of Obama or McCain could there be a better time to vote for a 3rd party?
That’s where my vote will go.[/quote]
Totally agree, that’s where my vote will go too.October 8, 2008 at 3:25 PM #283794Participant[quote=cooprider]McBama is a joke.
It’s only a matter of time before a legitimate 3rd party rises up. Why not start voting for it now?
Given the choice of Obama or McCain could there be a better time to vote for a 3rd party?
That’s where my vote will go.[/quote]
Totally agree, that’s where my vote will go too.October 8, 2008 at 3:25 PM #283810Participant[quote=cooprider]McBama is a joke.
It’s only a matter of time before a legitimate 3rd party rises up. Why not start voting for it now?
Given the choice of Obama or McCain could there be a better time to vote for a 3rd party?
That’s where my vote will go.[/quote]
Totally agree, that’s where my vote will go too.October 8, 2008 at 3:25 PM #283821Participant[quote=cooprider]McBama is a joke.
It’s only a matter of time before a legitimate 3rd party rises up. Why not start voting for it now?
Given the choice of Obama or McCain could there be a better time to vote for a 3rd party?
That’s where my vote will go.[/quote]
Totally agree, that’s where my vote will go too.October 8, 2008 at 3:40 PM #283493NewtoSanDiego
GuestLooks like McCain came up with that proposal on the SPOT!!! He was reallying winging it.
October 8, 2008 at 3:40 PM #283778GuestLooks like McCain came up with that proposal on the SPOT!!! He was reallying winging it.
October 8, 2008 at 3:40 PM #283804GuestLooks like McCain came up with that proposal on the SPOT!!! He was reallying winging it.
October 8, 2008 at 3:40 PM #283820GuestLooks like McCain came up with that proposal on the SPOT!!! He was reallying winging it.
October 8, 2008 at 3:40 PM #283830GuestLooks like McCain came up with that proposal on the SPOT!!! He was reallying winging it.
October 8, 2008 at 3:47 PM #283503UCGal
Participant[quote=arraya]”As president of the United States, I would order the Secretary of the Treasury to immediately buy up the bad home loan mortgages in America, and renegotiate at the new value of those homes, at the diminished value of those homes, and let people be able to make those payments and stay in those homes. Is it expensive? Yes.”
Sounds like a true fiscal conservative..[/quote]
The Treasury already has the authority to buy the houses and have the loans renegotiated. As of Oct 1st, the bill that past in late July gave them that power.
What McCain offered up last night, and was explained in greater detail by his advisor Holtz-Eakin this morning, is that he will have the government buy the mortgages AT FULL VALUE from the bank. Then renegotiate the loans that the taxpayers now own.
In other words – it’s a terrible deal for the taxpayers, but a great deal for the banks.
For what it’s worth – I’m against the home mortgage bailouts. I feel that ALL parties involved in this lending free-for-for all should suffer the natural consequences – buyers who bought out of their price range due to some misguided sense of entitlement, banks who made loans to people who could not afford to make the payments. Consequences for all!
October 8, 2008 at 3:47 PM #283788Participant[quote=arraya]”As president of the United States, I would order the Secretary of the Treasury to immediately buy up the bad home loan mortgages in America, and renegotiate at the new value of those homes, at the diminished value of those homes, and let people be able to make those payments and stay in those homes. Is it expensive? Yes.”
Sounds like a true fiscal conservative..[/quote]
The Treasury already has the authority to buy the houses and have the loans renegotiated. As of Oct 1st, the bill that past in late July gave them that power.
What McCain offered up last night, and was explained in greater detail by his advisor Holtz-Eakin this morning, is that he will have the government buy the mortgages AT FULL VALUE from the bank. Then renegotiate the loans that the taxpayers now own.
In other words – it’s a terrible deal for the taxpayers, but a great deal for the banks.
For what it’s worth – I’m against the home mortgage bailouts. I feel that ALL parties involved in this lending free-for-for all should suffer the natural consequences – buyers who bought out of their price range due to some misguided sense of entitlement, banks who made loans to people who could not afford to make the payments. Consequences for all!
October 8, 2008 at 3:47 PM #283814Participant[quote=arraya]”As president of the United States, I would order the Secretary of the Treasury to immediately buy up the bad home loan mortgages in America, and renegotiate at the new value of those homes, at the diminished value of those homes, and let people be able to make those payments and stay in those homes. Is it expensive? Yes.”
Sounds like a true fiscal conservative..[/quote]
The Treasury already has the authority to buy the houses and have the loans renegotiated. As of Oct 1st, the bill that past in late July gave them that power.
What McCain offered up last night, and was explained in greater detail by his advisor Holtz-Eakin this morning, is that he will have the government buy the mortgages AT FULL VALUE from the bank. Then renegotiate the loans that the taxpayers now own.
In other words – it’s a terrible deal for the taxpayers, but a great deal for the banks.
For what it’s worth – I’m against the home mortgage bailouts. I feel that ALL parties involved in this lending free-for-for all should suffer the natural consequences – buyers who bought out of their price range due to some misguided sense of entitlement, banks who made loans to people who could not afford to make the payments. Consequences for all!
October 8, 2008 at 3:47 PM #283831Participant[quote=arraya]”As president of the United States, I would order the Secretary of the Treasury to immediately buy up the bad home loan mortgages in America, and renegotiate at the new value of those homes, at the diminished value of those homes, and let people be able to make those payments and stay in those homes. Is it expensive? Yes.”
Sounds like a true fiscal conservative..[/quote]
The Treasury already has the authority to buy the houses and have the loans renegotiated. As of Oct 1st, the bill that past in late July gave them that power.
What McCain offered up last night, and was explained in greater detail by his advisor Holtz-Eakin this morning, is that he will have the government buy the mortgages AT FULL VALUE from the bank. Then renegotiate the loans that the taxpayers now own.
In other words – it’s a terrible deal for the taxpayers, but a great deal for the banks.
For what it’s worth – I’m against the home mortgage bailouts. I feel that ALL parties involved in this lending free-for-for all should suffer the natural consequences – buyers who bought out of their price range due to some misguided sense of entitlement, banks who made loans to people who could not afford to make the payments. Consequences for all!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.