So, is this a tact way of saying there is something to this formula? Cause 17 posts later I still dont see one of the standard ‘it is different here’ rationals being used to discredit this.
70k*4.3466= 304262. Obviously this isnt perfect because interest rates move daily and layoffs/hires effect the job market, but add a +/- 5% so between 290k and 320k seem reasonable?
If so then we could, atleast in theory, compute what an interest rate surge would do to housing prices.
4.75% would =313k
5.50% would =288k
5.75% would =280k
6.00% would =272k
Basically every .25% would be 8k in housing price movement.