- This topic has 85 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 16, 2008 at 9:53 AM #171049March 16, 2008 at 10:24 AM #171086peterbParticipant
Start searching for homes that have been listed for over 4 or 5 months. Since many listing agreements are on a 6 month term, people may be more “open” to lower offers and have not yet pulled their home off the market by the 5th month. This one in Pt. Loma looks to have been listed for 7 months before they took this offer. And I would say that their $899K asking price was probably lower than the 2005 peak prices for this house in this area!! So this probably constitutes a 35% to 40% decrease from 2005 peak prices and in one of the more “upscale” areas of SD.
As I was once told in a RE seminar,”The way you get deals is to make offers!!” And I would say that capitulation of the “hold-outs” and those in denial to the price decline is starting to happen.March 16, 2008 at 10:24 AM #171184peterbParticipantStart searching for homes that have been listed for over 4 or 5 months. Since many listing agreements are on a 6 month term, people may be more “open” to lower offers and have not yet pulled their home off the market by the 5th month. This one in Pt. Loma looks to have been listed for 7 months before they took this offer. And I would say that their $899K asking price was probably lower than the 2005 peak prices for this house in this area!! So this probably constitutes a 35% to 40% decrease from 2005 peak prices and in one of the more “upscale” areas of SD.
As I was once told in a RE seminar,”The way you get deals is to make offers!!” And I would say that capitulation of the “hold-outs” and those in denial to the price decline is starting to happen.March 16, 2008 at 10:24 AM #171079peterbParticipantStart searching for homes that have been listed for over 4 or 5 months. Since many listing agreements are on a 6 month term, people may be more “open” to lower offers and have not yet pulled their home off the market by the 5th month. This one in Pt. Loma looks to have been listed for 7 months before they took this offer. And I would say that their $899K asking price was probably lower than the 2005 peak prices for this house in this area!! So this probably constitutes a 35% to 40% decrease from 2005 peak prices and in one of the more “upscale” areas of SD.
As I was once told in a RE seminar,”The way you get deals is to make offers!!” And I would say that capitulation of the “hold-outs” and those in denial to the price decline is starting to happen.March 16, 2008 at 10:24 AM #170748peterbParticipantStart searching for homes that have been listed for over 4 or 5 months. Since many listing agreements are on a 6 month term, people may be more “open” to lower offers and have not yet pulled their home off the market by the 5th month. This one in Pt. Loma looks to have been listed for 7 months before they took this offer. And I would say that their $899K asking price was probably lower than the 2005 peak prices for this house in this area!! So this probably constitutes a 35% to 40% decrease from 2005 peak prices and in one of the more “upscale” areas of SD.
As I was once told in a RE seminar,”The way you get deals is to make offers!!” And I would say that capitulation of the “hold-outs” and those in denial to the price decline is starting to happen.March 16, 2008 at 10:24 AM #171104peterbParticipantStart searching for homes that have been listed for over 4 or 5 months. Since many listing agreements are on a 6 month term, people may be more “open” to lower offers and have not yet pulled their home off the market by the 5th month. This one in Pt. Loma looks to have been listed for 7 months before they took this offer. And I would say that their $899K asking price was probably lower than the 2005 peak prices for this house in this area!! So this probably constitutes a 35% to 40% decrease from 2005 peak prices and in one of the more “upscale” areas of SD.
As I was once told in a RE seminar,”The way you get deals is to make offers!!” And I would say that capitulation of the “hold-outs” and those in denial to the price decline is starting to happen.March 16, 2008 at 10:26 AM #171091SD RealtorParticipantFarbet, one thing that amazes me is that nobody forces anyone to work with anyone else yet the majority of people still work with substandard realtors. The vast majority of buyers still don’t demand rebates from their agents, nor do they work with the agent because the agent is one of quaility but because the agent is a friend, or even family member.
Hey you get to choose who you work with and if you are tolerant of substandard work because you don’t want to hurt your sister in laws feelings or something like that then whose fault is it really?
Also on the Point Loma house referenced it is a great deal pricewise. Also note that the ENTIRE remodel of the home was not permitted and the fence sits on the neighbors side of the lot line. Furthermore the footprint of the home on the lot was changed and that was done without a permit.
I am not saying it is not a great deal but how many of you here would buy such a home? Sometimes knowing all the facts is helpful.
Please be honest.
March 16, 2008 at 10:26 AM #171084SD RealtorParticipantFarbet, one thing that amazes me is that nobody forces anyone to work with anyone else yet the majority of people still work with substandard realtors. The vast majority of buyers still don’t demand rebates from their agents, nor do they work with the agent because the agent is one of quaility but because the agent is a friend, or even family member.
Hey you get to choose who you work with and if you are tolerant of substandard work because you don’t want to hurt your sister in laws feelings or something like that then whose fault is it really?
Also on the Point Loma house referenced it is a great deal pricewise. Also note that the ENTIRE remodel of the home was not permitted and the fence sits on the neighbors side of the lot line. Furthermore the footprint of the home on the lot was changed and that was done without a permit.
I am not saying it is not a great deal but how many of you here would buy such a home? Sometimes knowing all the facts is helpful.
Please be honest.
March 16, 2008 at 10:26 AM #170753SD RealtorParticipantFarbet, one thing that amazes me is that nobody forces anyone to work with anyone else yet the majority of people still work with substandard realtors. The vast majority of buyers still don’t demand rebates from their agents, nor do they work with the agent because the agent is one of quaility but because the agent is a friend, or even family member.
Hey you get to choose who you work with and if you are tolerant of substandard work because you don’t want to hurt your sister in laws feelings or something like that then whose fault is it really?
Also on the Point Loma house referenced it is a great deal pricewise. Also note that the ENTIRE remodel of the home was not permitted and the fence sits on the neighbors side of the lot line. Furthermore the footprint of the home on the lot was changed and that was done without a permit.
I am not saying it is not a great deal but how many of you here would buy such a home? Sometimes knowing all the facts is helpful.
Please be honest.
March 16, 2008 at 10:26 AM #171109SD RealtorParticipantFarbet, one thing that amazes me is that nobody forces anyone to work with anyone else yet the majority of people still work with substandard realtors. The vast majority of buyers still don’t demand rebates from their agents, nor do they work with the agent because the agent is one of quaility but because the agent is a friend, or even family member.
Hey you get to choose who you work with and if you are tolerant of substandard work because you don’t want to hurt your sister in laws feelings or something like that then whose fault is it really?
Also on the Point Loma house referenced it is a great deal pricewise. Also note that the ENTIRE remodel of the home was not permitted and the fence sits on the neighbors side of the lot line. Furthermore the footprint of the home on the lot was changed and that was done without a permit.
I am not saying it is not a great deal but how many of you here would buy such a home? Sometimes knowing all the facts is helpful.
Please be honest.
March 16, 2008 at 10:26 AM #171190SD RealtorParticipantFarbet, one thing that amazes me is that nobody forces anyone to work with anyone else yet the majority of people still work with substandard realtors. The vast majority of buyers still don’t demand rebates from their agents, nor do they work with the agent because the agent is one of quaility but because the agent is a friend, or even family member.
Hey you get to choose who you work with and if you are tolerant of substandard work because you don’t want to hurt your sister in laws feelings or something like that then whose fault is it really?
Also on the Point Loma house referenced it is a great deal pricewise. Also note that the ENTIRE remodel of the home was not permitted and the fence sits on the neighbors side of the lot line. Furthermore the footprint of the home on the lot was changed and that was done without a permit.
I am not saying it is not a great deal but how many of you here would buy such a home? Sometimes knowing all the facts is helpful.
Please be honest.
March 16, 2008 at 12:45 PM #171199La Jolla RenterParticipantsdr and SD Realtor or any other Realtor,
Does low balling damage a realtor’s reputation? (30% to 50% off kind of low balling)
Specifically if working in snooty little markets like La Jolla, RSF, etc.
I read a real estate investing book way back when that promoted a low balling technique in which you find a starving agent and pay them a set hourly rate to submit 100 offers at 50% off the asking price of the homes for sale in a desired area. Each offer was very professionally presented with a letter expressing all cash close in 7 days etc. The whole idea was to fish out the serious sellers.
March 16, 2008 at 12:45 PM #171204La Jolla RenterParticipantsdr and SD Realtor or any other Realtor,
Does low balling damage a realtor’s reputation? (30% to 50% off kind of low balling)
Specifically if working in snooty little markets like La Jolla, RSF, etc.
I read a real estate investing book way back when that promoted a low balling technique in which you find a starving agent and pay them a set hourly rate to submit 100 offers at 50% off the asking price of the homes for sale in a desired area. Each offer was very professionally presented with a letter expressing all cash close in 7 days etc. The whole idea was to fish out the serious sellers.
March 16, 2008 at 12:45 PM #171225La Jolla RenterParticipantsdr and SD Realtor or any other Realtor,
Does low balling damage a realtor’s reputation? (30% to 50% off kind of low balling)
Specifically if working in snooty little markets like La Jolla, RSF, etc.
I read a real estate investing book way back when that promoted a low balling technique in which you find a starving agent and pay them a set hourly rate to submit 100 offers at 50% off the asking price of the homes for sale in a desired area. Each offer was very professionally presented with a letter expressing all cash close in 7 days etc. The whole idea was to fish out the serious sellers.
March 16, 2008 at 12:45 PM #171305La Jolla RenterParticipantsdr and SD Realtor or any other Realtor,
Does low balling damage a realtor’s reputation? (30% to 50% off kind of low balling)
Specifically if working in snooty little markets like La Jolla, RSF, etc.
I read a real estate investing book way back when that promoted a low balling technique in which you find a starving agent and pay them a set hourly rate to submit 100 offers at 50% off the asking price of the homes for sale in a desired area. Each offer was very professionally presented with a letter expressing all cash close in 7 days etc. The whole idea was to fish out the serious sellers.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.