- This topic has 82 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:15 AM #178523March 29, 2008 at 10:15 AM #178069SlyParticipant
Has it ever occurred to anybody that Hillary knows she is done. Her strategy is top inflict as much damage to Obama as posible resulting in Obama being defeated in 2008.
Hillary will then come back in 2012 and run against McCain, if he is still alive in 2012.
March 29, 2008 at 10:26 AM #178440CostaMesaParticipantI think this situation arises from the phrase Bill repeated during the ’92 election – ‘not until the last dog lies down do I give up.’ (or something to that effect)
By giving it all she’s got, she’s trying to show that she’s got the fight in her that Obama tries not to present. For those who base their decisions on what they see on TV, this has the potential to affect their choice. For anyone who doesn’t qualify for the IQ under 60 tax deduction – it’s appalling.
Did anyone else notice that her primary donors sent the nastygram to Pelosi asking her to keep her nose out of their quest? That would pretty much qualify as sedition IMO.
March 29, 2008 at 10:26 AM #178441CostaMesaParticipantI think this situation arises from the phrase Bill repeated during the ’92 election – ‘not until the last dog lies down do I give up.’ (or something to that effect)
By giving it all she’s got, she’s trying to show that she’s got the fight in her that Obama tries not to present. For those who base their decisions on what they see on TV, this has the potential to affect their choice. For anyone who doesn’t qualify for the IQ under 60 tax deduction – it’s appalling.
Did anyone else notice that her primary donors sent the nastygram to Pelosi asking her to keep her nose out of their quest? That would pretty much qualify as sedition IMO.
March 29, 2008 at 10:26 AM #178074CostaMesaParticipantI think this situation arises from the phrase Bill repeated during the ’92 election – ‘not until the last dog lies down do I give up.’ (or something to that effect)
By giving it all she’s got, she’s trying to show that she’s got the fight in her that Obama tries not to present. For those who base their decisions on what they see on TV, this has the potential to affect their choice. For anyone who doesn’t qualify for the IQ under 60 tax deduction – it’s appalling.
Did anyone else notice that her primary donors sent the nastygram to Pelosi asking her to keep her nose out of their quest? That would pretty much qualify as sedition IMO.
March 29, 2008 at 10:26 AM #178431CostaMesaParticipantI think this situation arises from the phrase Bill repeated during the ’92 election – ‘not until the last dog lies down do I give up.’ (or something to that effect)
By giving it all she’s got, she’s trying to show that she’s got the fight in her that Obama tries not to present. For those who base their decisions on what they see on TV, this has the potential to affect their choice. For anyone who doesn’t qualify for the IQ under 60 tax deduction – it’s appalling.
Did anyone else notice that her primary donors sent the nastygram to Pelosi asking her to keep her nose out of their quest? That would pretty much qualify as sedition IMO.
March 29, 2008 at 10:26 AM #178429CostaMesaParticipantI think this situation arises from the phrase Bill repeated during the ’92 election – ‘not until the last dog lies down do I give up.’ (or something to that effect)
By giving it all she’s got, she’s trying to show that she’s got the fight in her that Obama tries not to present. For those who base their decisions on what they see on TV, this has the potential to affect their choice. For anyone who doesn’t qualify for the IQ under 60 tax deduction – it’s appalling.
Did anyone else notice that her primary donors sent the nastygram to Pelosi asking her to keep her nose out of their quest? That would pretty much qualify as sedition IMO.
March 29, 2008 at 10:26 AM #178528CostaMesaParticipantI think this situation arises from the phrase Bill repeated during the ’92 election – ‘not until the last dog lies down do I give up.’ (or something to that effect)
By giving it all she’s got, she’s trying to show that she’s got the fight in her that Obama tries not to present. For those who base their decisions on what they see on TV, this has the potential to affect their choice. For anyone who doesn’t qualify for the IQ under 60 tax deduction – it’s appalling.
Did anyone else notice that her primary donors sent the nastygram to Pelosi asking her to keep her nose out of their quest? That would pretty much qualify as sedition IMO.
March 29, 2008 at 10:59 AM #178551speedingpulletParticipantSly said:
Has it ever occurred to anybody that Hillary knows she is done.IIRC, someone on Tim Russert was saying something about her going for the Governorship of NY in 2010, and using it as a stepping-stone for the 2012 presidential elections.
The reasoning being that, because David Paterson is having a motor-mouth problem about his past ‘indescretions’, he will be out of the running for re-election in 2010.
Hillary bags the Governorship – being the senator from NY will help greatly – she gets enough ‘experience’ to beat Obama fair and square in 2012, and everyone’s happy.Don’t know if its possible, or even probable.
March 29, 2008 at 10:59 AM #178466speedingpulletParticipantSly said:
Has it ever occurred to anybody that Hillary knows she is done.IIRC, someone on Tim Russert was saying something about her going for the Governorship of NY in 2010, and using it as a stepping-stone for the 2012 presidential elections.
The reasoning being that, because David Paterson is having a motor-mouth problem about his past ‘indescretions’, he will be out of the running for re-election in 2010.
Hillary bags the Governorship – being the senator from NY will help greatly – she gets enough ‘experience’ to beat Obama fair and square in 2012, and everyone’s happy.Don’t know if its possible, or even probable.
March 29, 2008 at 10:59 AM #178454speedingpulletParticipantSly said:
Has it ever occurred to anybody that Hillary knows she is done.IIRC, someone on Tim Russert was saying something about her going for the Governorship of NY in 2010, and using it as a stepping-stone for the 2012 presidential elections.
The reasoning being that, because David Paterson is having a motor-mouth problem about his past ‘indescretions’, he will be out of the running for re-election in 2010.
Hillary bags the Governorship – being the senator from NY will help greatly – she gets enough ‘experience’ to beat Obama fair and square in 2012, and everyone’s happy.Don’t know if its possible, or even probable.
March 29, 2008 at 10:59 AM #178465speedingpulletParticipantSly said:
Has it ever occurred to anybody that Hillary knows she is done.IIRC, someone on Tim Russert was saying something about her going for the Governorship of NY in 2010, and using it as a stepping-stone for the 2012 presidential elections.
The reasoning being that, because David Paterson is having a motor-mouth problem about his past ‘indescretions’, he will be out of the running for re-election in 2010.
Hillary bags the Governorship – being the senator from NY will help greatly – she gets enough ‘experience’ to beat Obama fair and square in 2012, and everyone’s happy.Don’t know if its possible, or even probable.
March 29, 2008 at 10:59 AM #178099speedingpulletParticipantSly said:
Has it ever occurred to anybody that Hillary knows she is done.IIRC, someone on Tim Russert was saying something about her going for the Governorship of NY in 2010, and using it as a stepping-stone for the 2012 presidential elections.
The reasoning being that, because David Paterson is having a motor-mouth problem about his past ‘indescretions’, he will be out of the running for re-election in 2010.
Hillary bags the Governorship – being the senator from NY will help greatly – she gets enough ‘experience’ to beat Obama fair and square in 2012, and everyone’s happy.Don’t know if its possible, or even probable.
March 29, 2008 at 3:03 PM #178186CMcGParticipantI’m a Dem and have closely followed this race. Supposedly, many Rebubs turned out in record numbers in other states to vote for Obama purely because they think McCain can’t win against Hillary, but can defeat Obama. I don’t like any of the three candidates. I voted against Bush both times and can tell my kid with a clear conscience, “I didn’t do this.” I don’t care who the nominees are this time. I will vote, but not in the president’s race. Disclosures: My mom’s dad was in the trenches of WW1 in Europe; my dad fought in Italy in WWII and again in Korea where the bottom of his left leg was shot off; his much younger brother did three Vietnam tours; I have two nephews in Iraq — one on his third tour, the other on his second.
March 29, 2008 at 3:03 PM #178544CMcGParticipantI’m a Dem and have closely followed this race. Supposedly, many Rebubs turned out in record numbers in other states to vote for Obama purely because they think McCain can’t win against Hillary, but can defeat Obama. I don’t like any of the three candidates. I voted against Bush both times and can tell my kid with a clear conscience, “I didn’t do this.” I don’t care who the nominees are this time. I will vote, but not in the president’s race. Disclosures: My mom’s dad was in the trenches of WW1 in Europe; my dad fought in Italy in WWII and again in Korea where the bottom of his left leg was shot off; his much younger brother did three Vietnam tours; I have two nephews in Iraq — one on his third tour, the other on his second.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.