- This topic has 75 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by
ninaprincess.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 12, 2011 at 10:40 AM #653288January 12, 2011 at 10:45 AM #652175
ninaprincess
ParticipantHi Yellow,
We are planning to stay 5 to 10 years. We might move to a better area if we can but it is hard to say now.
I am weak in math and statistics so I can’t make the calculations you mentioned. If possible, could you make a calculation based on 7 years that I will stay there?
Thanks,
Nina
January 12, 2011 at 10:45 AM #652241ninaprincess
ParticipantHi Yellow,
We are planning to stay 5 to 10 years. We might move to a better area if we can but it is hard to say now.
I am weak in math and statistics so I can’t make the calculations you mentioned. If possible, could you make a calculation based on 7 years that I will stay there?
Thanks,
Nina
January 12, 2011 at 10:45 AM #652829ninaprincess
ParticipantHi Yellow,
We are planning to stay 5 to 10 years. We might move to a better area if we can but it is hard to say now.
I am weak in math and statistics so I can’t make the calculations you mentioned. If possible, could you make a calculation based on 7 years that I will stay there?
Thanks,
Nina
January 12, 2011 at 10:45 AM #652966ninaprincess
ParticipantHi Yellow,
We are planning to stay 5 to 10 years. We might move to a better area if we can but it is hard to say now.
I am weak in math and statistics so I can’t make the calculations you mentioned. If possible, could you make a calculation based on 7 years that I will stay there?
Thanks,
Nina
January 12, 2011 at 10:45 AM #653293ninaprincess
ParticipantHi Yellow,
We are planning to stay 5 to 10 years. We might move to a better area if we can but it is hard to say now.
I am weak in math and statistics so I can’t make the calculations you mentioned. If possible, could you make a calculation based on 7 years that I will stay there?
Thanks,
Nina
January 12, 2011 at 11:05 AM #652180ljinvestor
ParticipantI like option 3 because I’ve heard it isn’t as easy to get PMI dropped as one might think. Even if you get PMI taken off in 3-4yrs the payment in option 2 is only $31mo cheaper then option 3.
I would also not personally pay $1500 extra per month to mortgage unless your purchase is way below current market values.
Might be better to put that in savings or emergency fund in case market took another big hit.
January 12, 2011 at 11:05 AM #652246ljinvestor
ParticipantI like option 3 because I’ve heard it isn’t as easy to get PMI dropped as one might think. Even if you get PMI taken off in 3-4yrs the payment in option 2 is only $31mo cheaper then option 3.
I would also not personally pay $1500 extra per month to mortgage unless your purchase is way below current market values.
Might be better to put that in savings or emergency fund in case market took another big hit.
January 12, 2011 at 11:05 AM #652834ljinvestor
ParticipantI like option 3 because I’ve heard it isn’t as easy to get PMI dropped as one might think. Even if you get PMI taken off in 3-4yrs the payment in option 2 is only $31mo cheaper then option 3.
I would also not personally pay $1500 extra per month to mortgage unless your purchase is way below current market values.
Might be better to put that in savings or emergency fund in case market took another big hit.
January 12, 2011 at 11:05 AM #652971ljinvestor
ParticipantI like option 3 because I’ve heard it isn’t as easy to get PMI dropped as one might think. Even if you get PMI taken off in 3-4yrs the payment in option 2 is only $31mo cheaper then option 3.
I would also not personally pay $1500 extra per month to mortgage unless your purchase is way below current market values.
Might be better to put that in savings or emergency fund in case market took another big hit.
January 12, 2011 at 11:05 AM #653298ljinvestor
ParticipantI like option 3 because I’ve heard it isn’t as easy to get PMI dropped as one might think. Even if you get PMI taken off in 3-4yrs the payment in option 2 is only $31mo cheaper then option 3.
I would also not personally pay $1500 extra per month to mortgage unless your purchase is way below current market values.
Might be better to put that in savings or emergency fund in case market took another big hit.
January 12, 2011 at 11:14 AM #652195Scarlett
ParticipantFor 3 years with option 2 you paid for PMI 36 x 169 = $6084 and with option 3 you paid extra 36 x $31 = $1116. So after 3 years you are ahead with option 3 by almost $5000.
For the NEXT 3 years with option 2 you pay monthly no PMI and $2159/month, while with option 3 you pay MORE by $31 x 36 = $1116 (over 3 years). Over the remaining 27 years that’s ~30K that you pay more with option 3. So 30-5 = 25K more over the life of the loan with option 3. It’s not a whole lot. If you don’t plan to stay that long, but only 6-7 years, then I also would go with option 3, since it’s a pain to remove PMI.
(Presuming all fees/costs are the same; insurance and taxes are the same in both cases so I ignored those)January 12, 2011 at 11:14 AM #652260Scarlett
ParticipantFor 3 years with option 2 you paid for PMI 36 x 169 = $6084 and with option 3 you paid extra 36 x $31 = $1116. So after 3 years you are ahead with option 3 by almost $5000.
For the NEXT 3 years with option 2 you pay monthly no PMI and $2159/month, while with option 3 you pay MORE by $31 x 36 = $1116 (over 3 years). Over the remaining 27 years that’s ~30K that you pay more with option 3. So 30-5 = 25K more over the life of the loan with option 3. It’s not a whole lot. If you don’t plan to stay that long, but only 6-7 years, then I also would go with option 3, since it’s a pain to remove PMI.
(Presuming all fees/costs are the same; insurance and taxes are the same in both cases so I ignored those)January 12, 2011 at 11:14 AM #652849Scarlett
ParticipantFor 3 years with option 2 you paid for PMI 36 x 169 = $6084 and with option 3 you paid extra 36 x $31 = $1116. So after 3 years you are ahead with option 3 by almost $5000.
For the NEXT 3 years with option 2 you pay monthly no PMI and $2159/month, while with option 3 you pay MORE by $31 x 36 = $1116 (over 3 years). Over the remaining 27 years that’s ~30K that you pay more with option 3. So 30-5 = 25K more over the life of the loan with option 3. It’s not a whole lot. If you don’t plan to stay that long, but only 6-7 years, then I also would go with option 3, since it’s a pain to remove PMI.
(Presuming all fees/costs are the same; insurance and taxes are the same in both cases so I ignored those)January 12, 2011 at 11:14 AM #652986Scarlett
ParticipantFor 3 years with option 2 you paid for PMI 36 x 169 = $6084 and with option 3 you paid extra 36 x $31 = $1116. So after 3 years you are ahead with option 3 by almost $5000.
For the NEXT 3 years with option 2 you pay monthly no PMI and $2159/month, while with option 3 you pay MORE by $31 x 36 = $1116 (over 3 years). Over the remaining 27 years that’s ~30K that you pay more with option 3. So 30-5 = 25K more over the life of the loan with option 3. It’s not a whole lot. If you don’t plan to stay that long, but only 6-7 years, then I also would go with option 3, since it’s a pain to remove PMI.
(Presuming all fees/costs are the same; insurance and taxes are the same in both cases so I ignored those) -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
