- This topic has 125 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by pbnative.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 5, 2008 at 4:49 PM #253153August 5, 2008 at 6:03 PM #252948OperationParticipant
Great one bugs!
August 5, 2008 at 6:03 PM #253112OperationParticipantGreat one bugs!
August 5, 2008 at 6:03 PM #253121OperationParticipantGreat one bugs!
August 5, 2008 at 6:03 PM #253179OperationParticipantGreat one bugs!
August 5, 2008 at 6:03 PM #253183OperationParticipantGreat one bugs!
August 5, 2008 at 11:32 PM #253175CardiffBaseballParticipantOne thing I find different since moving to Cali is the constant leaving out of the property taxes as it relates to the house payment.
Is it safe to say the tax “uh-hum, benefits” of owning effectively wipe out the true cost of property taxes?
I just did some elementary calculations and it’s probably safe to say that interest benefit wipes out the property taxes with plenty left over.
August 5, 2008 at 11:32 PM #253337CardiffBaseballParticipantOne thing I find different since moving to Cali is the constant leaving out of the property taxes as it relates to the house payment.
Is it safe to say the tax “uh-hum, benefits” of owning effectively wipe out the true cost of property taxes?
I just did some elementary calculations and it’s probably safe to say that interest benefit wipes out the property taxes with plenty left over.
August 5, 2008 at 11:32 PM #253346CardiffBaseballParticipantOne thing I find different since moving to Cali is the constant leaving out of the property taxes as it relates to the house payment.
Is it safe to say the tax “uh-hum, benefits” of owning effectively wipe out the true cost of property taxes?
I just did some elementary calculations and it’s probably safe to say that interest benefit wipes out the property taxes with plenty left over.
August 5, 2008 at 11:32 PM #253405CardiffBaseballParticipantOne thing I find different since moving to Cali is the constant leaving out of the property taxes as it relates to the house payment.
Is it safe to say the tax “uh-hum, benefits” of owning effectively wipe out the true cost of property taxes?
I just did some elementary calculations and it’s probably safe to say that interest benefit wipes out the property taxes with plenty left over.
August 5, 2008 at 11:32 PM #253407CardiffBaseballParticipantOne thing I find different since moving to Cali is the constant leaving out of the property taxes as it relates to the house payment.
Is it safe to say the tax “uh-hum, benefits” of owning effectively wipe out the true cost of property taxes?
I just did some elementary calculations and it’s probably safe to say that interest benefit wipes out the property taxes with plenty left over.
August 5, 2008 at 11:52 PM #253189anParticipantCardiffBaseball, I think it’s pretty safe to say tax benefit cancel out the tax you have to pay. I ran many loan amortization calculation and that’s my conclusion as well. That’s why I usually just ignore tax benefit and property tax and just concentrate on PI vs rent.
August 5, 2008 at 11:52 PM #253352anParticipantCardiffBaseball, I think it’s pretty safe to say tax benefit cancel out the tax you have to pay. I ran many loan amortization calculation and that’s my conclusion as well. That’s why I usually just ignore tax benefit and property tax and just concentrate on PI vs rent.
August 5, 2008 at 11:52 PM #253361anParticipantCardiffBaseball, I think it’s pretty safe to say tax benefit cancel out the tax you have to pay. I ran many loan amortization calculation and that’s my conclusion as well. That’s why I usually just ignore tax benefit and property tax and just concentrate on PI vs rent.
August 5, 2008 at 11:52 PM #253420anParticipantCardiffBaseball, I think it’s pretty safe to say tax benefit cancel out the tax you have to pay. I ran many loan amortization calculation and that’s my conclusion as well. That’s why I usually just ignore tax benefit and property tax and just concentrate on PI vs rent.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.