- This topic has 440 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 19, 2009 at 12:34 AM #370112March 19, 2009 at 1:08 AM #369507
Butleroftwo
ParticipantCoach K sees a problem also;
“Somebody said that we’re not in President Obama’s Final Four, and as much as I respect what he’s doing, really, the economy is something that he should focus on, probably more than the brackets,” Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski said from the Blue Devils’ first-round site in Greensboro, N.CMarch 19, 2009 at 1:08 AM #369793ParticipantCoach K sees a problem also;
“Somebody said that we’re not in President Obama’s Final Four, and as much as I respect what he’s doing, really, the economy is something that he should focus on, probably more than the brackets,” Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski said from the Blue Devils’ first-round site in Greensboro, N.CMarch 19, 2009 at 1:08 AM #369960ParticipantCoach K sees a problem also;
“Somebody said that we’re not in President Obama’s Final Four, and as much as I respect what he’s doing, really, the economy is something that he should focus on, probably more than the brackets,” Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski said from the Blue Devils’ first-round site in Greensboro, N.CMarch 19, 2009 at 1:08 AM #370001ParticipantCoach K sees a problem also;
“Somebody said that we’re not in President Obama’s Final Four, and as much as I respect what he’s doing, really, the economy is something that he should focus on, probably more than the brackets,” Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski said from the Blue Devils’ first-round site in Greensboro, N.CMarch 19, 2009 at 1:08 AM #370117ParticipantCoach K sees a problem also;
“Somebody said that we’re not in President Obama’s Final Four, and as much as I respect what he’s doing, really, the economy is something that he should focus on, probably more than the brackets,” Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski said from the Blue Devils’ first-round site in Greensboro, N.CMarch 19, 2009 at 1:16 AM #369517NotCranky
Participant[quote=rnen]Let me preface this by saying that I AM NOT a ditto head although I do occasionaly listen to Rush. On matters of fiscal concerns I agree with him more often than not… on other matters not so much.
I will say this …. he IS willing to stand up and be accountable for what he says. He has offered to debate the Chosen One live on air and unscripted. Now before you Obamites go off on how I am just another whacked out far right Rush supporter READ the first paragraph again! I am sure that those that still can reason and do not function totally on emotion would agree…. it would be facinating to see. Two guys who have very strong and, for the most part, very different views of what America should be, going head to head explaining and defending thier views. I would pay good money to see that!
On fiscal matters my money would be on Limbaugh, the rest the edge would go to Obama, with the caveat that he can debate with the same ability that he can read a prompter. There is no doubt, when scripted Obama can captivate his audience.
At the very least I think an unscripted debate would expose to the audience personal view points of both of them that we may not see when they operate in their chosen and safe environments.
[/quote]
rnen my wife and I have talked about things like this unscripted Rush/Obama debate. I think we agreed Rush would still be in a advantageous enviornment regardless of where this debate were held. Rush could tear into him like a pitbull and Obama, as a politician, would have one hand tied behind his back. Maybe I am wrong, but I can’t see any president wanting to walk into that?
I am not an Obamite. However my response to the OP’s question of a Rush/Palin ticket is “barf”.
March 19, 2009 at 1:16 AM #369803Participant[quote=rnen]Let me preface this by saying that I AM NOT a ditto head although I do occasionaly listen to Rush. On matters of fiscal concerns I agree with him more often than not… on other matters not so much.
I will say this …. he IS willing to stand up and be accountable for what he says. He has offered to debate the Chosen One live on air and unscripted. Now before you Obamites go off on how I am just another whacked out far right Rush supporter READ the first paragraph again! I am sure that those that still can reason and do not function totally on emotion would agree…. it would be facinating to see. Two guys who have very strong and, for the most part, very different views of what America should be, going head to head explaining and defending thier views. I would pay good money to see that!
On fiscal matters my money would be on Limbaugh, the rest the edge would go to Obama, with the caveat that he can debate with the same ability that he can read a prompter. There is no doubt, when scripted Obama can captivate his audience.
At the very least I think an unscripted debate would expose to the audience personal view points of both of them that we may not see when they operate in their chosen and safe environments.
[/quote]
rnen my wife and I have talked about things like this unscripted Rush/Obama debate. I think we agreed Rush would still be in a advantageous enviornment regardless of where this debate were held. Rush could tear into him like a pitbull and Obama, as a politician, would have one hand tied behind his back. Maybe I am wrong, but I can’t see any president wanting to walk into that?
I am not an Obamite. However my response to the OP’s question of a Rush/Palin ticket is “barf”.
March 19, 2009 at 1:16 AM #369970Participant[quote=rnen]Let me preface this by saying that I AM NOT a ditto head although I do occasionaly listen to Rush. On matters of fiscal concerns I agree with him more often than not… on other matters not so much.
I will say this …. he IS willing to stand up and be accountable for what he says. He has offered to debate the Chosen One live on air and unscripted. Now before you Obamites go off on how I am just another whacked out far right Rush supporter READ the first paragraph again! I am sure that those that still can reason and do not function totally on emotion would agree…. it would be facinating to see. Two guys who have very strong and, for the most part, very different views of what America should be, going head to head explaining and defending thier views. I would pay good money to see that!
On fiscal matters my money would be on Limbaugh, the rest the edge would go to Obama, with the caveat that he can debate with the same ability that he can read a prompter. There is no doubt, when scripted Obama can captivate his audience.
At the very least I think an unscripted debate would expose to the audience personal view points of both of them that we may not see when they operate in their chosen and safe environments.
[/quote]
rnen my wife and I have talked about things like this unscripted Rush/Obama debate. I think we agreed Rush would still be in a advantageous enviornment regardless of where this debate were held. Rush could tear into him like a pitbull and Obama, as a politician, would have one hand tied behind his back. Maybe I am wrong, but I can’t see any president wanting to walk into that?
I am not an Obamite. However my response to the OP’s question of a Rush/Palin ticket is “barf”.
March 19, 2009 at 1:16 AM #370011Participant[quote=rnen]Let me preface this by saying that I AM NOT a ditto head although I do occasionaly listen to Rush. On matters of fiscal concerns I agree with him more often than not… on other matters not so much.
I will say this …. he IS willing to stand up and be accountable for what he says. He has offered to debate the Chosen One live on air and unscripted. Now before you Obamites go off on how I am just another whacked out far right Rush supporter READ the first paragraph again! I am sure that those that still can reason and do not function totally on emotion would agree…. it would be facinating to see. Two guys who have very strong and, for the most part, very different views of what America should be, going head to head explaining and defending thier views. I would pay good money to see that!
On fiscal matters my money would be on Limbaugh, the rest the edge would go to Obama, with the caveat that he can debate with the same ability that he can read a prompter. There is no doubt, when scripted Obama can captivate his audience.
At the very least I think an unscripted debate would expose to the audience personal view points of both of them that we may not see when they operate in their chosen and safe environments.
[/quote]
rnen my wife and I have talked about things like this unscripted Rush/Obama debate. I think we agreed Rush would still be in a advantageous enviornment regardless of where this debate were held. Rush could tear into him like a pitbull and Obama, as a politician, would have one hand tied behind his back. Maybe I am wrong, but I can’t see any president wanting to walk into that?
I am not an Obamite. However my response to the OP’s question of a Rush/Palin ticket is “barf”.
March 19, 2009 at 1:16 AM #370127Participant[quote=rnen]Let me preface this by saying that I AM NOT a ditto head although I do occasionaly listen to Rush. On matters of fiscal concerns I agree with him more often than not… on other matters not so much.
I will say this …. he IS willing to stand up and be accountable for what he says. He has offered to debate the Chosen One live on air and unscripted. Now before you Obamites go off on how I am just another whacked out far right Rush supporter READ the first paragraph again! I am sure that those that still can reason and do not function totally on emotion would agree…. it would be facinating to see. Two guys who have very strong and, for the most part, very different views of what America should be, going head to head explaining and defending thier views. I would pay good money to see that!
On fiscal matters my money would be on Limbaugh, the rest the edge would go to Obama, with the caveat that he can debate with the same ability that he can read a prompter. There is no doubt, when scripted Obama can captivate his audience.
At the very least I think an unscripted debate would expose to the audience personal view points of both of them that we may not see when they operate in their chosen and safe environments.
[/quote]
rnen my wife and I have talked about things like this unscripted Rush/Obama debate. I think we agreed Rush would still be in a advantageous enviornment regardless of where this debate were held. Rush could tear into him like a pitbull and Obama, as a politician, would have one hand tied behind his back. Maybe I am wrong, but I can’t see any president wanting to walk into that?
I am not an Obamite. However my response to the OP’s question of a Rush/Palin ticket is “barf”.
March 19, 2009 at 1:19 AM #369522TheBreeze
Participant[quote=rnen]
I will say this …. he IS willing to stand up and be accountable for what he says. He has offered to debate the Chosen One live on air and unscripted.[/quote]
Yes, how brave of Rush to offer to participate in what would likely be the highest rated TV/radio program ever.
March 19, 2009 at 1:19 AM #369808Participant[quote=rnen]
I will say this …. he IS willing to stand up and be accountable for what he says. He has offered to debate the Chosen One live on air and unscripted.[/quote]
Yes, how brave of Rush to offer to participate in what would likely be the highest rated TV/radio program ever.
March 19, 2009 at 1:19 AM #369975Participant[quote=rnen]
I will say this …. he IS willing to stand up and be accountable for what he says. He has offered to debate the Chosen One live on air and unscripted.[/quote]
Yes, how brave of Rush to offer to participate in what would likely be the highest rated TV/radio program ever.
March 19, 2009 at 1:19 AM #370016Participant[quote=rnen]
I will say this …. he IS willing to stand up and be accountable for what he says. He has offered to debate the Chosen One live on air and unscripted.[/quote]
Yes, how brave of Rush to offer to participate in what would likely be the highest rated TV/radio program ever.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.