Limbaugh/Palin 2012

[dbapig]

[quote=briansd1][quote=dbapig]
Health insurance and hospitals – WHO can afford to pay the insurance and the hospitals the sums they are demanding???
[/quote]

Health care is expensive because people don’t see the bills at all, or way after the services are rendered.

I think that we should have national public health coverage with a catch.

Patients would be responsible to pay, out of pocket, the first 1/4 of their income in health care costs.

You’ll see patients bargaining for coverage and prices will drop drastically.

You’ll also see natural selection resume its proper course. The people with bad genes won’t be able to reproduce so much.[/quote]

National public health coverage is what I’m praying for. Basic/preventative care should not count against the 1/4 income rule or it will just keep people from seeking care until it’s too late imho.

But what do I know? Looks like the healthcare reform is being shaped by the same people who want to keep profiting from it. Read a line in an article that said insurance companies are coming around to ’embracing’ health care reform because they realize many of their ‘customers’ will be moving over to MediCare, due to the aging of the baby boomers. What perfect timing for them.

[sd_matt]

You all notice how the media almost never gets it from the horses mouth?

An example is gun control. I never saw a survey that asked a thousand random cops from the street what difference making all guns illegal would make.

Same here with health care. I don’t recall any survey that asks a thousand random doctors what are the pros and cons of our current system as compared to more socialized systems.

I’ve heard a couple of docs on AM radio but that is it. News and talk radio are extremely bad.

[sd_matt]

You all notice how the media almost never gets it from the horses mouth?

An example is gun control. I never saw a survey that asked a thousand random cops from the street what difference making all guns illegal would make.

Same here with health care. I don’t recall any survey that asks a thousand random doctors what are the pros and cons of our current system as compared to more socialized systems.

I’ve heard a couple of docs on AM radio but that is it. News and talk radio are extremely bad.

[sd_matt]

You all notice how the media almost never gets it from the horses mouth?

An example is gun control. I never saw a survey that asked a thousand random cops from the street what difference making all guns illegal would make.

Same here with health care. I don’t recall any survey that asks a thousand random doctors what are the pros and cons of our current system as compared to more socialized systems.

I’ve heard a couple of docs on AM radio but that is it. News and talk radio are extremely bad.

[sd_matt]

You all notice how the media almost never gets it from the horses mouth?

An example is gun control. I never saw a survey that asked a thousand random cops from the street what difference making all guns illegal would make.

Same here with health care. I don’t recall any survey that asks a thousand random doctors what are the pros and cons of our current system as compared to more socialized systems.

I’ve heard a couple of docs on AM radio but that is it. News and talk radio are extremely bad.

[sd_matt]

You all notice how the media almost never gets it from the horses mouth?

An example is gun control. I never saw a survey that asked a thousand random cops from the street what difference making all guns illegal would make.

Same here with health care. I don’t recall any survey that asks a thousand random doctors what are the pros and cons of our current system as compared to more socialized systems.

I’ve heard a couple of docs on AM radio but that is it. News and talk radio are extremely bad.

[jficquette]

[quote=scaredycat]besides the opiate problem, i wonder if people generally would be prejudiced against a fat candidate. when was the last fat president? hasn’t it been a long while? I’d be interested in some reserach of the body fat index of presidents going back to george wash. was the last really corpulent prez back in the 1800’s? i think nowadays people (rightly or wrongly) tend to associate fat with being out of control. also, in terms of dying i office, mccain was probably more likely statistically to make it to the end of his term without spending a good amount of time in a coronary care facility than rush. not sure about the stats on that though, but im sure it would be in the voters subconscious. the fat, the serious drugs, tend to show a guy who cannot control his imuplses, which is okay with me personally, i like party people, just think america would rather have a toned, controlled black guy than fat, wild white guy in 2012. this sint the 1800s and fat is our national touchstone for character.[/quote]

Franken is a fat ass but he is only in the Senate and he is only there through voter fraud so lets not count him. Franks could lose a few pounds.

Hillary Clinton has a fat ass as does that pig Obama named as head of Homeland Security. The woman he named as his Economic advisor is fat and ugly as sin too.

I don’t listen to Limbaugh but he would do a hell of a lot better job then Obongo is doing and is much more presentable then virtually anyone Obongo has appointed to office.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=scaredycat]besides the opiate problem, i wonder if people generally would be prejudiced against a fat candidate. when was the last fat president? hasn’t it been a long while? I’d be interested in some reserach of the body fat index of presidents going back to george wash. was the last really corpulent prez back in the 1800’s? i think nowadays people (rightly or wrongly) tend to associate fat with being out of control. also, in terms of dying i office, mccain was probably more likely statistically to make it to the end of his term without spending a good amount of time in a coronary care facility than rush. not sure about the stats on that though, but im sure it would be in the voters subconscious. the fat, the serious drugs, tend to show a guy who cannot control his imuplses, which is okay with me personally, i like party people, just think america would rather have a toned, controlled black guy than fat, wild white guy in 2012. this sint the 1800s and fat is our national touchstone for character.[/quote]

Franken is a fat ass but he is only in the Senate and he is only there through voter fraud so lets not count him. Franks could lose a few pounds.

Hillary Clinton has a fat ass as does that pig Obama named as head of Homeland Security. The woman he named as his Economic advisor is fat and ugly as sin too.

I don’t listen to Limbaugh but he would do a hell of a lot better job then Obongo is doing and is much more presentable then virtually anyone Obongo has appointed to office.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=scaredycat]besides the opiate problem, i wonder if people generally would be prejudiced against a fat candidate. when was the last fat president? hasn’t it been a long while? I’d be interested in some reserach of the body fat index of presidents going back to george wash. was the last really corpulent prez back in the 1800’s? i think nowadays people (rightly or wrongly) tend to associate fat with being out of control. also, in terms of dying i office, mccain was probably more likely statistically to make it to the end of his term without spending a good amount of time in a coronary care facility than rush. not sure about the stats on that though, but im sure it would be in the voters subconscious. the fat, the serious drugs, tend to show a guy who cannot control his imuplses, which is okay with me personally, i like party people, just think america would rather have a toned, controlled black guy than fat, wild white guy in 2012. this sint the 1800s and fat is our national touchstone for character.[/quote]

Franken is a fat ass but he is only in the Senate and he is only there through voter fraud so lets not count him. Franks could lose a few pounds.

Hillary Clinton has a fat ass as does that pig Obama named as head of Homeland Security. The woman he named as his Economic advisor is fat and ugly as sin too.

I don’t listen to Limbaugh but he would do a hell of a lot better job then Obongo is doing and is much more presentable then virtually anyone Obongo has appointed to office.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=scaredycat]besides the opiate problem, i wonder if people generally would be prejudiced against a fat candidate. when was the last fat president? hasn’t it been a long while? I’d be interested in some reserach of the body fat index of presidents going back to george wash. was the last really corpulent prez back in the 1800’s? i think nowadays people (rightly or wrongly) tend to associate fat with being out of control. also, in terms of dying i office, mccain was probably more likely statistically to make it to the end of his term without spending a good amount of time in a coronary care facility than rush. not sure about the stats on that though, but im sure it would be in the voters subconscious. the fat, the serious drugs, tend to show a guy who cannot control his imuplses, which is okay with me personally, i like party people, just think america would rather have a toned, controlled black guy than fat, wild white guy in 2012. this sint the 1800s and fat is our national touchstone for character.[/quote]

Franken is a fat ass but he is only in the Senate and he is only there through voter fraud so lets not count him. Franks could lose a few pounds.

Hillary Clinton has a fat ass as does that pig Obama named as head of Homeland Security. The woman he named as his Economic advisor is fat and ugly as sin too.

I don’t listen to Limbaugh but he would do a hell of a lot better job then Obongo is doing and is much more presentable then virtually anyone Obongo has appointed to office.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=scaredycat]besides the opiate problem, i wonder if people generally would be prejudiced against a fat candidate. when was the last fat president? hasn’t it been a long while? I’d be interested in some reserach of the body fat index of presidents going back to george wash. was the last really corpulent prez back in the 1800’s? i think nowadays people (rightly or wrongly) tend to associate fat with being out of control. also, in terms of dying i office, mccain was probably more likely statistically to make it to the end of his term without spending a good amount of time in a coronary care facility than rush. not sure about the stats on that though, but im sure it would be in the voters subconscious. the fat, the serious drugs, tend to show a guy who cannot control his imuplses, which is okay with me personally, i like party people, just think america would rather have a toned, controlled black guy than fat, wild white guy in 2012. this sint the 1800s and fat is our national touchstone for character.[/quote]

Franken is a fat ass but he is only in the Senate and he is only there through voter fraud so lets not count him. Franks could lose a few pounds.

Hillary Clinton has a fat ass as does that pig Obama named as head of Homeland Security. The woman he named as his Economic advisor is fat and ugly as sin too.

I don’t listen to Limbaugh but he would do a hell of a lot better job then Obongo is doing and is much more presentable then virtually anyone Obongo has appointed to office.

John

[an]

[quote=flu]
Oh crap, then we have to listen to a lot of you continue to rant on why you still can’t buy a house in San Diego, how it’s unfair that folks stay their foreclosed home without paying a dime, and why there are so many buyers buying with government subsidized money that you contributed to with your tax dollars. By then, the government will also own Ford, Boeing, GE, most banks, most health insurance, and hospitals too.
hmmmmmm…[/quote]
Bahwahahahah, good one flu. It wouldn’t surprise me if that’s exactly what would happen if Limbaugh/Palin run in 2012. But that’s OK, Brian is not complaining. He’s happy renting, right Brian?

[an]

[quote=flu]
Oh crap, then we have to listen to a lot of you continue to rant on why you still can’t buy a house in San Diego, how it’s unfair that folks stay their foreclosed home without paying a dime, and why there are so many buyers buying with government subsidized money that you contributed to with your tax dollars. By then, the government will also own Ford, Boeing, GE, most banks, most health insurance, and hospitals too.
hmmmmmm…[/quote]
Bahwahahahah, good one flu. It wouldn’t surprise me if that’s exactly what would happen if Limbaugh/Palin run in 2012. But that’s OK, Brian is not complaining. He’s happy renting, right Brian?

[an]

[quote=flu]
Oh crap, then we have to listen to a lot of you continue to rant on why you still can’t buy a house in San Diego, how it’s unfair that folks stay their foreclosed home without paying a dime, and why there are so many buyers buying with government subsidized money that you contributed to with your tax dollars. By then, the government will also own Ford, Boeing, GE, most banks, most health insurance, and hospitals too.
hmmmmmm…[/quote]
Bahwahahahah, good one flu. It wouldn’t surprise me if that’s exactly what would happen if Limbaugh/Palin run in 2012. But that’s OK, Brian is not complaining. He’s happy renting, right Brian?

[an]

[quote=flu]
Oh crap, then we have to listen to a lot of you continue to rant on why you still can’t buy a house in San Diego, how it’s unfair that folks stay their foreclosed home without paying a dime, and why there are so many buyers buying with government subsidized money that you contributed to with your tax dollars. By then, the government will also own Ford, Boeing, GE, most banks, most health insurance, and hospitals too.
hmmmmmm…[/quote]
Bahwahahahah, good one flu. It wouldn’t surprise me if that’s exactly what would happen if Limbaugh/Palin run in 2012. But that’s OK, Brian is not complaining. He’s happy renting, right Brian?

[Author]

Posts