- This topic has 440 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 9, 2009 at 11:59 PM #428689July 10, 2009 at 8:49 AM #428003
svelteParticipantRush will never run. Ain’t gonna happen.
He’s a fat slob who enjoys making millions by stirring people up. Why would he give up that gig?
But ole Jeb Bush has been getting vocal lately…I wouldn’t put it past him to run.
Anybody notice that we seem to have entered an era of Presential dynasties? Seems very much like Roman times…and we know what happened to that society.
July 10, 2009 at 8:49 AM #428230svelteParticipantRush will never run. Ain’t gonna happen.
He’s a fat slob who enjoys making millions by stirring people up. Why would he give up that gig?
But ole Jeb Bush has been getting vocal lately…I wouldn’t put it past him to run.
Anybody notice that we seem to have entered an era of Presential dynasties? Seems very much like Roman times…and we know what happened to that society.
July 10, 2009 at 8:49 AM #428521svelteParticipantRush will never run. Ain’t gonna happen.
He’s a fat slob who enjoys making millions by stirring people up. Why would he give up that gig?
But ole Jeb Bush has been getting vocal lately…I wouldn’t put it past him to run.
Anybody notice that we seem to have entered an era of Presential dynasties? Seems very much like Roman times…and we know what happened to that society.
July 10, 2009 at 8:49 AM #428592svelteParticipantRush will never run. Ain’t gonna happen.
He’s a fat slob who enjoys making millions by stirring people up. Why would he give up that gig?
But ole Jeb Bush has been getting vocal lately…I wouldn’t put it past him to run.
Anybody notice that we seem to have entered an era of Presential dynasties? Seems very much like Roman times…and we know what happened to that society.
July 10, 2009 at 8:49 AM #428753svelteParticipantRush will never run. Ain’t gonna happen.
He’s a fat slob who enjoys making millions by stirring people up. Why would he give up that gig?
But ole Jeb Bush has been getting vocal lately…I wouldn’t put it past him to run.
Anybody notice that we seem to have entered an era of Presential dynasties? Seems very much like Roman times…and we know what happened to that society.
July 10, 2009 at 11:43 AM #428103dbapig
Participant[quote=svelte]
Anybody notice that we seem to have entered an era of Presential dynasties? Seems very much like Roman times…and we know what happened to that society.[/quote]I agree with that comment. White House isn’t supposed to be part of a ‘family business enterprise’.
We should have a rule that ex-president’s wife/sons/siblings/cousins should not run for POTUS for at least 20 years after the ex-president’s last day as POTUS.
There’s got to be enough talent outside of these circles who can be a good POTUS…
July 10, 2009 at 11:43 AM #428330Participant[quote=svelte]
Anybody notice that we seem to have entered an era of Presential dynasties? Seems very much like Roman times…and we know what happened to that society.[/quote]I agree with that comment. White House isn’t supposed to be part of a ‘family business enterprise’.
We should have a rule that ex-president’s wife/sons/siblings/cousins should not run for POTUS for at least 20 years after the ex-president’s last day as POTUS.
There’s got to be enough talent outside of these circles who can be a good POTUS…
July 10, 2009 at 11:43 AM #428621Participant[quote=svelte]
Anybody notice that we seem to have entered an era of Presential dynasties? Seems very much like Roman times…and we know what happened to that society.[/quote]I agree with that comment. White House isn’t supposed to be part of a ‘family business enterprise’.
We should have a rule that ex-president’s wife/sons/siblings/cousins should not run for POTUS for at least 20 years after the ex-president’s last day as POTUS.
There’s got to be enough talent outside of these circles who can be a good POTUS…
July 10, 2009 at 11:43 AM #428691Participant[quote=svelte]
Anybody notice that we seem to have entered an era of Presential dynasties? Seems very much like Roman times…and we know what happened to that society.[/quote]I agree with that comment. White House isn’t supposed to be part of a ‘family business enterprise’.
We should have a rule that ex-president’s wife/sons/siblings/cousins should not run for POTUS for at least 20 years after the ex-president’s last day as POTUS.
There’s got to be enough talent outside of these circles who can be a good POTUS…
July 10, 2009 at 11:43 AM #428852Participant[quote=svelte]
Anybody notice that we seem to have entered an era of Presential dynasties? Seems very much like Roman times…and we know what happened to that society.[/quote]I agree with that comment. White House isn’t supposed to be part of a ‘family business enterprise’.
We should have a rule that ex-president’s wife/sons/siblings/cousins should not run for POTUS for at least 20 years after the ex-president’s last day as POTUS.
There’s got to be enough talent outside of these circles who can be a good POTUS…
July 10, 2009 at 11:56 AM #428114Participant[quote=flu]By then, the government will also own Ford, Boeing, GE, most banks, most health insurance, and hospitals too.
[/quote]If Ford, most banks, most health insurance and hospitals did their job, the government wouldn’t own them.
Here are the causes of why it came to be:
Ford – bad management
banks – bad management coupled with GREED
Health insurance and hospitals – WHO can afford to pay the insurance and the hospitals the sums they are demanding???I agree It’s not a good thing that govt ‘owns’ them.
hmmmmmm…
July 10, 2009 at 11:56 AM #428340Participant[quote=flu]By then, the government will also own Ford, Boeing, GE, most banks, most health insurance, and hospitals too.
[/quote]If Ford, most banks, most health insurance and hospitals did their job, the government wouldn’t own them.
Here are the causes of why it came to be:
Ford – bad management
banks – bad management coupled with GREED
Health insurance and hospitals – WHO can afford to pay the insurance and the hospitals the sums they are demanding???I agree It’s not a good thing that govt ‘owns’ them.
hmmmmmm…
July 10, 2009 at 11:56 AM #428631Participant[quote=flu]By then, the government will also own Ford, Boeing, GE, most banks, most health insurance, and hospitals too.
[/quote]If Ford, most banks, most health insurance and hospitals did their job, the government wouldn’t own them.
Here are the causes of why it came to be:
Ford – bad management
banks – bad management coupled with GREED
Health insurance and hospitals – WHO can afford to pay the insurance and the hospitals the sums they are demanding???I agree It’s not a good thing that govt ‘owns’ them.
hmmmmmm…
July 10, 2009 at 11:56 AM #428701Participant[quote=flu]By then, the government will also own Ford, Boeing, GE, most banks, most health insurance, and hospitals too.
[/quote]If Ford, most banks, most health insurance and hospitals did their job, the government wouldn’t own them.
Here are the causes of why it came to be:
Ford – bad management
banks – bad management coupled with GREED
Health insurance and hospitals – WHO can afford to pay the insurance and the hospitals the sums they are demanding???I agree It’s not a good thing that govt ‘owns’ them.
hmmmmmm…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
