- This topic has 440 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by
Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 19, 2009 at 3:35 AM #370206March 19, 2009 at 3:50 AM #369616
Butleroftwo
Participant[quote=afx114]So would all the Obama haters out there prefer to have McCain and Palin in charge right now? Seriously? I’ve certainly been disappointed with some of Obama’s moves, but look at the alternative for fucks sake.[/quote]
I would believe that McCain wouldn’t introduce a new tax every week like what is happening now. He may have come up with a few but not ten.
He wouldn’t have unnamed our actual POW’s or the war on terror.
He wouldn’t have stopped enforcing the drug laws.
He wouldn’t have had ACORN work on the’10 census.
He wouldn’t have had Veterans pay the insurance on their wounds.
He wouldn’t have screamed fire about the AIG bonuses after specifically adding them into law.
He wouldn’t have tripled the deficit (at least) in his first term.
He wouldn’t have social programs as economic stimulus.
He may have hired tiny Tim.March 19, 2009 at 3:50 AM #369903Butleroftwo
Participant[quote=afx114]So would all the Obama haters out there prefer to have McCain and Palin in charge right now? Seriously? I’ve certainly been disappointed with some of Obama’s moves, but look at the alternative for fucks sake.[/quote]
I would believe that McCain wouldn’t introduce a new tax every week like what is happening now. He may have come up with a few but not ten.
He wouldn’t have unnamed our actual POW’s or the war on terror.
He wouldn’t have stopped enforcing the drug laws.
He wouldn’t have had ACORN work on the’10 census.
He wouldn’t have had Veterans pay the insurance on their wounds.
He wouldn’t have screamed fire about the AIG bonuses after specifically adding them into law.
He wouldn’t have tripled the deficit (at least) in his first term.
He wouldn’t have social programs as economic stimulus.
He may have hired tiny Tim.March 19, 2009 at 3:50 AM #370070Butleroftwo
Participant[quote=afx114]So would all the Obama haters out there prefer to have McCain and Palin in charge right now? Seriously? I’ve certainly been disappointed with some of Obama’s moves, but look at the alternative for fucks sake.[/quote]
I would believe that McCain wouldn’t introduce a new tax every week like what is happening now. He may have come up with a few but not ten.
He wouldn’t have unnamed our actual POW’s or the war on terror.
He wouldn’t have stopped enforcing the drug laws.
He wouldn’t have had ACORN work on the’10 census.
He wouldn’t have had Veterans pay the insurance on their wounds.
He wouldn’t have screamed fire about the AIG bonuses after specifically adding them into law.
He wouldn’t have tripled the deficit (at least) in his first term.
He wouldn’t have social programs as economic stimulus.
He may have hired tiny Tim.March 19, 2009 at 3:50 AM #370111Butleroftwo
Participant[quote=afx114]So would all the Obama haters out there prefer to have McCain and Palin in charge right now? Seriously? I’ve certainly been disappointed with some of Obama’s moves, but look at the alternative for fucks sake.[/quote]
I would believe that McCain wouldn’t introduce a new tax every week like what is happening now. He may have come up with a few but not ten.
He wouldn’t have unnamed our actual POW’s or the war on terror.
He wouldn’t have stopped enforcing the drug laws.
He wouldn’t have had ACORN work on the’10 census.
He wouldn’t have had Veterans pay the insurance on their wounds.
He wouldn’t have screamed fire about the AIG bonuses after specifically adding them into law.
He wouldn’t have tripled the deficit (at least) in his first term.
He wouldn’t have social programs as economic stimulus.
He may have hired tiny Tim.March 19, 2009 at 3:50 AM #370226Butleroftwo
Participant[quote=afx114]So would all the Obama haters out there prefer to have McCain and Palin in charge right now? Seriously? I’ve certainly been disappointed with some of Obama’s moves, but look at the alternative for fucks sake.[/quote]
I would believe that McCain wouldn’t introduce a new tax every week like what is happening now. He may have come up with a few but not ten.
He wouldn’t have unnamed our actual POW’s or the war on terror.
He wouldn’t have stopped enforcing the drug laws.
He wouldn’t have had ACORN work on the’10 census.
He wouldn’t have had Veterans pay the insurance on their wounds.
He wouldn’t have screamed fire about the AIG bonuses after specifically adding them into law.
He wouldn’t have tripled the deficit (at least) in his first term.
He wouldn’t have social programs as economic stimulus.
He may have hired tiny Tim.March 19, 2009 at 4:01 AM #369602Arraya
ParticipantReally you could just put GOP buzz terms like “big spending democrats”, “small government”, “global warming is communist plot”, “tough on terrorists”, “tax cuts help the economy” and “support the troops” on a loop and you would get a few hundred thousand listeners.
March 19, 2009 at 4:01 AM #369888Arraya
ParticipantReally you could just put GOP buzz terms like “big spending democrats”, “small government”, “global warming is communist plot”, “tough on terrorists”, “tax cuts help the economy” and “support the troops” on a loop and you would get a few hundred thousand listeners.
March 19, 2009 at 4:01 AM #370055Arraya
ParticipantReally you could just put GOP buzz terms like “big spending democrats”, “small government”, “global warming is communist plot”, “tough on terrorists”, “tax cuts help the economy” and “support the troops” on a loop and you would get a few hundred thousand listeners.
March 19, 2009 at 4:01 AM #370096Arraya
ParticipantReally you could just put GOP buzz terms like “big spending democrats”, “small government”, “global warming is communist plot”, “tough on terrorists”, “tax cuts help the economy” and “support the troops” on a loop and you would get a few hundred thousand listeners.
March 19, 2009 at 4:01 AM #370211Arraya
ParticipantReally you could just put GOP buzz terms like “big spending democrats”, “small government”, “global warming is communist plot”, “tough on terrorists”, “tax cuts help the economy” and “support the troops” on a loop and you would get a few hundred thousand listeners.
March 19, 2009 at 4:19 AM #369646afx114
Participant[quote=rnen]we all should just shut up and follow him like lemings.[/quote]
Stretch words much? Where did I say that? I asked if you would have preferred McCain/Palin. Did you even read my post? I don’t agree with some of his moves either. But that doesn’t mean I think he’s going to destroy America with his evil socialist Muslim plot. How’s that for stretching words? I think I’m getting pretty good at the technique.
Besides, I thought this post was about Limbaugh/Palin? Why does everything always have to come back to Obama with you people? You people are obsessed. Yeah, I said you people. THREE TIMES.
March 19, 2009 at 4:19 AM #369933afx114
Participant[quote=rnen]we all should just shut up and follow him like lemings.[/quote]
Stretch words much? Where did I say that? I asked if you would have preferred McCain/Palin. Did you even read my post? I don’t agree with some of his moves either. But that doesn’t mean I think he’s going to destroy America with his evil socialist Muslim plot. How’s that for stretching words? I think I’m getting pretty good at the technique.
Besides, I thought this post was about Limbaugh/Palin? Why does everything always have to come back to Obama with you people? You people are obsessed. Yeah, I said you people. THREE TIMES.
March 19, 2009 at 4:19 AM #370100afx114
Participant[quote=rnen]we all should just shut up and follow him like lemings.[/quote]
Stretch words much? Where did I say that? I asked if you would have preferred McCain/Palin. Did you even read my post? I don’t agree with some of his moves either. But that doesn’t mean I think he’s going to destroy America with his evil socialist Muslim plot. How’s that for stretching words? I think I’m getting pretty good at the technique.
Besides, I thought this post was about Limbaugh/Palin? Why does everything always have to come back to Obama with you people? You people are obsessed. Yeah, I said you people. THREE TIMES.
March 19, 2009 at 4:19 AM #370141afx114
Participant[quote=rnen]we all should just shut up and follow him like lemings.[/quote]
Stretch words much? Where did I say that? I asked if you would have preferred McCain/Palin. Did you even read my post? I don’t agree with some of his moves either. But that doesn’t mean I think he’s going to destroy America with his evil socialist Muslim plot. How’s that for stretching words? I think I’m getting pretty good at the technique.
Besides, I thought this post was about Limbaugh/Palin? Why does everything always have to come back to Obama with you people? You people are obsessed. Yeah, I said you people. THREE TIMES.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.