Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Like the S&L Crisis only MUCH WORST
- This topic has 100 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by peterb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 25, 2008 at 12:06 PM #261812August 25, 2008 at 12:22 PM #261529AnonymousGuest
The only glint on the cloud is that wages have risen for most so anyone saying ‘prices will go back to 2000
Most people talk about 2000 prices in the real sense, not the nominal sense. Since 2000 the wages of all the top 1% have at best been flat versus inflation. That means there really is no fundamental reason that prices should be any higher in real terms over the year 2000 prices. What drove up prices was the easy availability of lending that led to record highs for homeownership. People also tend to spend other people’s money much differently than they’d spend their own.
Inflation only helps debt if we get the corresponding wage inflation as well. Without wage inflation the debt becomes that more toxic as people are squeezed even tighter by increased costs.
August 25, 2008 at 12:22 PM #261731AnonymousGuestThe only glint on the cloud is that wages have risen for most so anyone saying ‘prices will go back to 2000
Most people talk about 2000 prices in the real sense, not the nominal sense. Since 2000 the wages of all the top 1% have at best been flat versus inflation. That means there really is no fundamental reason that prices should be any higher in real terms over the year 2000 prices. What drove up prices was the easy availability of lending that led to record highs for homeownership. People also tend to spend other people’s money much differently than they’d spend their own.
Inflation only helps debt if we get the corresponding wage inflation as well. Without wage inflation the debt becomes that more toxic as people are squeezed even tighter by increased costs.
August 25, 2008 at 12:22 PM #261740AnonymousGuestThe only glint on the cloud is that wages have risen for most so anyone saying ‘prices will go back to 2000
Most people talk about 2000 prices in the real sense, not the nominal sense. Since 2000 the wages of all the top 1% have at best been flat versus inflation. That means there really is no fundamental reason that prices should be any higher in real terms over the year 2000 prices. What drove up prices was the easy availability of lending that led to record highs for homeownership. People also tend to spend other people’s money much differently than they’d spend their own.
Inflation only helps debt if we get the corresponding wage inflation as well. Without wage inflation the debt becomes that more toxic as people are squeezed even tighter by increased costs.
August 25, 2008 at 12:22 PM #261788AnonymousGuestThe only glint on the cloud is that wages have risen for most so anyone saying ‘prices will go back to 2000
Most people talk about 2000 prices in the real sense, not the nominal sense. Since 2000 the wages of all the top 1% have at best been flat versus inflation. That means there really is no fundamental reason that prices should be any higher in real terms over the year 2000 prices. What drove up prices was the easy availability of lending that led to record highs for homeownership. People also tend to spend other people’s money much differently than they’d spend their own.
Inflation only helps debt if we get the corresponding wage inflation as well. Without wage inflation the debt becomes that more toxic as people are squeezed even tighter by increased costs.
August 25, 2008 at 12:22 PM #261828AnonymousGuestThe only glint on the cloud is that wages have risen for most so anyone saying ‘prices will go back to 2000
Most people talk about 2000 prices in the real sense, not the nominal sense. Since 2000 the wages of all the top 1% have at best been flat versus inflation. That means there really is no fundamental reason that prices should be any higher in real terms over the year 2000 prices. What drove up prices was the easy availability of lending that led to record highs for homeownership. People also tend to spend other people’s money much differently than they’d spend their own.
Inflation only helps debt if we get the corresponding wage inflation as well. Without wage inflation the debt becomes that more toxic as people are squeezed even tighter by increased costs.
August 25, 2008 at 12:30 PM #261535peterbParticipantHello Deflation!! It’s coming on hard and fast now. What’s Ben’s next trick to get reflation going? I cant wait for this one.
August 25, 2008 at 12:30 PM #261736peterbParticipantHello Deflation!! It’s coming on hard and fast now. What’s Ben’s next trick to get reflation going? I cant wait for this one.
August 25, 2008 at 12:30 PM #261745peterbParticipantHello Deflation!! It’s coming on hard and fast now. What’s Ben’s next trick to get reflation going? I cant wait for this one.
August 25, 2008 at 12:30 PM #261795peterbParticipantHello Deflation!! It’s coming on hard and fast now. What’s Ben’s next trick to get reflation going? I cant wait for this one.
August 25, 2008 at 12:30 PM #261833peterbParticipantHello Deflation!! It’s coming on hard and fast now. What’s Ben’s next trick to get reflation going? I cant wait for this one.
September 6, 2008 at 9:41 AM #266952jParticipantAre they still saying the Mortgage Crisis is not as bad as the S&L crisis?
I pretty sure that Fannie and Freddie are bigger than all the failed banks of the 90’s, well all the failed banks put together ever for that matter.
September 6, 2008 at 9:41 AM #267171jParticipantAre they still saying the Mortgage Crisis is not as bad as the S&L crisis?
I pretty sure that Fannie and Freddie are bigger than all the failed banks of the 90’s, well all the failed banks put together ever for that matter.
September 6, 2008 at 9:41 AM #267186jParticipantAre they still saying the Mortgage Crisis is not as bad as the S&L crisis?
I pretty sure that Fannie and Freddie are bigger than all the failed banks of the 90’s, well all the failed banks put together ever for that matter.
September 6, 2008 at 9:41 AM #267229jParticipantAre they still saying the Mortgage Crisis is not as bad as the S&L crisis?
I pretty sure that Fannie and Freddie are bigger than all the failed banks of the 90’s, well all the failed banks put together ever for that matter.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.