- This topic has 35 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by Scarlett.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 2, 2008 at 4:16 PM #279984October 2, 2008 at 4:25 PM #280006EugeneParticipant
Yes but in the “good old days” mortgage interest rates were 9% or higher. Average rates were above 9% continuously from 1978 to 1991. And saving money was easier. Banks paid 8-10% interest rates on savings and CDs. One dollar invested in Dow in 1980 was worth $3.50 in 1990.
Suppose that banks require max 30% housing to gross income. If the mortgage interest rate is 10%, that limits you to 3.1x income and you need to save 62% of your annual gross income for your 20% down payment.
If the mortgage interest rate is 5.5%, you need to save 90% of your annual gross income. You need to save 50 percent more money, even though savings interest rates are approaching zero, and stocks aren’t what they used to be, either. (One dollar invested into Dow in January of 2000 is now worth 91 cents)
October 2, 2008 at 4:25 PM #279676EugeneParticipantYes but in the “good old days” mortgage interest rates were 9% or higher. Average rates were above 9% continuously from 1978 to 1991. And saving money was easier. Banks paid 8-10% interest rates on savings and CDs. One dollar invested in Dow in 1980 was worth $3.50 in 1990.
Suppose that banks require max 30% housing to gross income. If the mortgage interest rate is 10%, that limits you to 3.1x income and you need to save 62% of your annual gross income for your 20% down payment.
If the mortgage interest rate is 5.5%, you need to save 90% of your annual gross income. You need to save 50 percent more money, even though savings interest rates are approaching zero, and stocks aren’t what they used to be, either. (One dollar invested into Dow in January of 2000 is now worth 91 cents)
October 2, 2008 at 4:25 PM #279946EugeneParticipantYes but in the “good old days” mortgage interest rates were 9% or higher. Average rates were above 9% continuously from 1978 to 1991. And saving money was easier. Banks paid 8-10% interest rates on savings and CDs. One dollar invested in Dow in 1980 was worth $3.50 in 1990.
Suppose that banks require max 30% housing to gross income. If the mortgage interest rate is 10%, that limits you to 3.1x income and you need to save 62% of your annual gross income for your 20% down payment.
If the mortgage interest rate is 5.5%, you need to save 90% of your annual gross income. You need to save 50 percent more money, even though savings interest rates are approaching zero, and stocks aren’t what they used to be, either. (One dollar invested into Dow in January of 2000 is now worth 91 cents)
October 2, 2008 at 4:25 PM #279953EugeneParticipantYes but in the “good old days” mortgage interest rates were 9% or higher. Average rates were above 9% continuously from 1978 to 1991. And saving money was easier. Banks paid 8-10% interest rates on savings and CDs. One dollar invested in Dow in 1980 was worth $3.50 in 1990.
Suppose that banks require max 30% housing to gross income. If the mortgage interest rate is 10%, that limits you to 3.1x income and you need to save 62% of your annual gross income for your 20% down payment.
If the mortgage interest rate is 5.5%, you need to save 90% of your annual gross income. You need to save 50 percent more money, even though savings interest rates are approaching zero, and stocks aren’t what they used to be, either. (One dollar invested into Dow in January of 2000 is now worth 91 cents)
October 2, 2008 at 4:25 PM #279994EugeneParticipantYes but in the “good old days” mortgage interest rates were 9% or higher. Average rates were above 9% continuously from 1978 to 1991. And saving money was easier. Banks paid 8-10% interest rates on savings and CDs. One dollar invested in Dow in 1980 was worth $3.50 in 1990.
Suppose that banks require max 30% housing to gross income. If the mortgage interest rate is 10%, that limits you to 3.1x income and you need to save 62% of your annual gross income for your 20% down payment.
If the mortgage interest rate is 5.5%, you need to save 90% of your annual gross income. You need to save 50 percent more money, even though savings interest rates are approaching zero, and stocks aren’t what they used to be, either. (One dollar invested into Dow in January of 2000 is now worth 91 cents)
October 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM #280004La Jolla RenterParticipantAnd, not too long ago…
an investment property cash flowed with 20% down.
The reason people rented is because they did not have 20% down.
How the hell did those basic financial fundamentals disappear in a few short years???
October 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM #280016La Jolla RenterParticipantAnd, not too long ago…
an investment property cash flowed with 20% down.
The reason people rented is because they did not have 20% down.
How the hell did those basic financial fundamentals disappear in a few short years???
October 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM #279957La Jolla RenterParticipantAnd, not too long ago…
an investment property cash flowed with 20% down.
The reason people rented is because they did not have 20% down.
How the hell did those basic financial fundamentals disappear in a few short years???
October 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM #279963La Jolla RenterParticipantAnd, not too long ago…
an investment property cash flowed with 20% down.
The reason people rented is because they did not have 20% down.
How the hell did those basic financial fundamentals disappear in a few short years???
October 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM #279686La Jolla RenterParticipantAnd, not too long ago…
an investment property cash flowed with 20% down.
The reason people rented is because they did not have 20% down.
How the hell did those basic financial fundamentals disappear in a few short years???
October 2, 2008 at 5:34 PM #279978RenParticipant[quote=La Jolla Renter]And, not too long ago…
an investment property cash flowed with 20% down.
[/quote]They do today, in Murrieta and Temecula. However, I believe there may also be some significant rent drops, so I’m not comfortable buying them just yet.
Next we’ll see it in inland San Diego.I don’t think lending standards will tighten to the point they were in the past, but eliminating the liar loans is a great first step.
October 2, 2008 at 5:34 PM #279972RenParticipant[quote=La Jolla Renter]And, not too long ago…
an investment property cash flowed with 20% down.
[/quote]They do today, in Murrieta and Temecula. However, I believe there may also be some significant rent drops, so I’m not comfortable buying them just yet.
Next we’ll see it in inland San Diego.I don’t think lending standards will tighten to the point they were in the past, but eliminating the liar loans is a great first step.
October 2, 2008 at 5:34 PM #279701RenParticipant[quote=La Jolla Renter]And, not too long ago…
an investment property cash flowed with 20% down.
[/quote]They do today, in Murrieta and Temecula. However, I believe there may also be some significant rent drops, so I’m not comfortable buying them just yet.
Next we’ll see it in inland San Diego.I don’t think lending standards will tighten to the point they were in the past, but eliminating the liar loans is a great first step.
October 2, 2008 at 5:34 PM #280019RenParticipant[quote=La Jolla Renter]And, not too long ago…
an investment property cash flowed with 20% down.
[/quote]They do today, in Murrieta and Temecula. However, I believe there may also be some significant rent drops, so I’m not comfortable buying them just yet.
Next we’ll see it in inland San Diego.I don’t think lending standards will tighten to the point they were in the past, but eliminating the liar loans is a great first step.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.