- This topic has 30 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by
EconProf.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 30, 2008 at 6:20 AM #12893May 30, 2008 at 7:54 AM #213975
NotCranky
ParticipantNotice starts when the landlord receives it but email is not very high proof that delivery of the notice has been accomplished. If the landlord responded right away confirming receipt that would help. When you are in a situation where technicalities matter it could be a problem. Hopefully not inthis case.
The best service is personal or by certified mail. It sounds like the tenant is not in a position to deliver it personally but in cases where that is possible it is a good idea to have the landlord sign an extra copy.May 30, 2008 at 7:54 AM #214131NotCranky
ParticipantNotice starts when the landlord receives it but email is not very high proof that delivery of the notice has been accomplished. If the landlord responded right away confirming receipt that would help. When you are in a situation where technicalities matter it could be a problem. Hopefully not inthis case.
The best service is personal or by certified mail. It sounds like the tenant is not in a position to deliver it personally but in cases where that is possible it is a good idea to have the landlord sign an extra copy.May 30, 2008 at 7:54 AM #214103NotCranky
ParticipantNotice starts when the landlord receives it but email is not very high proof that delivery of the notice has been accomplished. If the landlord responded right away confirming receipt that would help. When you are in a situation where technicalities matter it could be a problem. Hopefully not inthis case.
The best service is personal or by certified mail. It sounds like the tenant is not in a position to deliver it personally but in cases where that is possible it is a good idea to have the landlord sign an extra copy.May 30, 2008 at 7:54 AM #214077NotCranky
ParticipantNotice starts when the landlord receives it but email is not very high proof that delivery of the notice has been accomplished. If the landlord responded right away confirming receipt that would help. When you are in a situation where technicalities matter it could be a problem. Hopefully not inthis case.
The best service is personal or by certified mail. It sounds like the tenant is not in a position to deliver it personally but in cases where that is possible it is a good idea to have the landlord sign an extra copy.May 30, 2008 at 7:54 AM #214052NotCranky
ParticipantNotice starts when the landlord receives it but email is not very high proof that delivery of the notice has been accomplished. If the landlord responded right away confirming receipt that would help. When you are in a situation where technicalities matter it could be a problem. Hopefully not inthis case.
The best service is personal or by certified mail. It sounds like the tenant is not in a position to deliver it personally but in cases where that is possible it is a good idea to have the landlord sign an extra copy.May 30, 2008 at 9:10 AM #214097CavalierLion
ParticipantI would check the lease. It should specify how notice can be made, when is effective, and what the 30 day period is (e.g., whether it can begin mid-month or only the end of the month).
My guess is that it requires written notice. I’d be surprised if e-mail counts under the terms of the lease. Many people don’t use e-mail for anything official.
May 30, 2008 at 9:10 AM #214122CavalierLion
ParticipantI would check the lease. It should specify how notice can be made, when is effective, and what the 30 day period is (e.g., whether it can begin mid-month or only the end of the month).
My guess is that it requires written notice. I’d be surprised if e-mail counts under the terms of the lease. Many people don’t use e-mail for anything official.
May 30, 2008 at 9:10 AM #214020CavalierLion
ParticipantI would check the lease. It should specify how notice can be made, when is effective, and what the 30 day period is (e.g., whether it can begin mid-month or only the end of the month).
My guess is that it requires written notice. I’d be surprised if e-mail counts under the terms of the lease. Many people don’t use e-mail for anything official.
May 30, 2008 at 9:10 AM #214146CavalierLion
ParticipantI would check the lease. It should specify how notice can be made, when is effective, and what the 30 day period is (e.g., whether it can begin mid-month or only the end of the month).
My guess is that it requires written notice. I’d be surprised if e-mail counts under the terms of the lease. Many people don’t use e-mail for anything official.
May 30, 2008 at 9:10 AM #214176CavalierLion
ParticipantI would check the lease. It should specify how notice can be made, when is effective, and what the 30 day period is (e.g., whether it can begin mid-month or only the end of the month).
My guess is that it requires written notice. I’d be surprised if e-mail counts under the terms of the lease. Many people don’t use e-mail for anything official.
May 30, 2008 at 10:11 AM #214070La Jolla Renter
ParticipantI am a landlord and a renter, so speaking from experience, the laws in California favor renters, as it should IMO.
In, California, if a lease is month to month then you need to only give 30 day notice, if it is a week then one week notice. I was month to month. The landlord acknowledges receipt at the next day Eastern Time. I believe that if you use regular mail, then the time clock starts the day of the postmark. Again the laws favor renters. The property is in California, so I would guess that time zone dictates the time clock.
Anyone else… an attorney perhaps?
May 30, 2008 at 10:11 AM #214149La Jolla Renter
ParticipantI am a landlord and a renter, so speaking from experience, the laws in California favor renters, as it should IMO.
In, California, if a lease is month to month then you need to only give 30 day notice, if it is a week then one week notice. I was month to month. The landlord acknowledges receipt at the next day Eastern Time. I believe that if you use regular mail, then the time clock starts the day of the postmark. Again the laws favor renters. The property is in California, so I would guess that time zone dictates the time clock.
Anyone else… an attorney perhaps?
May 30, 2008 at 10:11 AM #214172La Jolla Renter
ParticipantI am a landlord and a renter, so speaking from experience, the laws in California favor renters, as it should IMO.
In, California, if a lease is month to month then you need to only give 30 day notice, if it is a week then one week notice. I was month to month. The landlord acknowledges receipt at the next day Eastern Time. I believe that if you use regular mail, then the time clock starts the day of the postmark. Again the laws favor renters. The property is in California, so I would guess that time zone dictates the time clock.
Anyone else… an attorney perhaps?
May 30, 2008 at 10:11 AM #214197La Jolla Renter
ParticipantI am a landlord and a renter, so speaking from experience, the laws in California favor renters, as it should IMO.
In, California, if a lease is month to month then you need to only give 30 day notice, if it is a week then one week notice. I was month to month. The landlord acknowledges receipt at the next day Eastern Time. I believe that if you use regular mail, then the time clock starts the day of the postmark. Again the laws favor renters. The property is in California, so I would guess that time zone dictates the time clock.
Anyone else… an attorney perhaps?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.