Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law
- This topic has 265 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 8 months ago by
bearishgurl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 30, 2011 at 4:28 PM #661072January 30, 2011 at 4:39 PM #659942
SD Realtor
ParticipantYes it was in a differen tpost but you were talking about the EXACT same thing. In fact in that thread you brought up the Holmes case again and you were referencing it again. In that thread that is where you made your assertion you were going to talk to other realtors to find out how many short sales fell through due to all those deadbeat dads and people with judgements.
Different thread but EXACT same topic and you DID SAY buyers were losing money due to THIS TOPIC we are discussing.
So please don’t say that you did not say something when you clearly did, it doesn’t mattter if it was another thread, it was the same topic. EXACT same topic.
*****
No fortunately (I hope) your posts are not scaring Piggs. Hopefully Piggs work with agents who have done a short sale within the last 19 years. Furthermore there are many more lurkers here then anyone even knows and many of them are first time buyers. Hopefully they would identify recent practical experience over armchair experts. I can not enforce or predict what most agents do or do not take care of in their own listing appts. Coming from the engineering field, I find most agents are boobs and I can never rely on them. That is just part of the process and you guide your clients through the bogs as best you can.
*****
Like other posters here who foretold all of us about the foreclosure tsunami, I am quite confident that your bold prediction about how this “landmark ruling” will cause a “wholesale change” in the way short sales are conducted is wrong.
I guess time will tell and we will see. I am not saying those changes you suggested would not be very good for the industry. However I prefer to live in the here and now and get things done as best I can within the current framework.
January 30, 2011 at 4:39 PM #660005ParticipantYes it was in a differen tpost but you were talking about the EXACT same thing. In fact in that thread you brought up the Holmes case again and you were referencing it again. In that thread that is where you made your assertion you were going to talk to other realtors to find out how many short sales fell through due to all those deadbeat dads and people with judgements.
Different thread but EXACT same topic and you DID SAY buyers were losing money due to THIS TOPIC we are discussing.
So please don’t say that you did not say something when you clearly did, it doesn’t mattter if it was another thread, it was the same topic. EXACT same topic.
*****
No fortunately (I hope) your posts are not scaring Piggs. Hopefully Piggs work with agents who have done a short sale within the last 19 years. Furthermore there are many more lurkers here then anyone even knows and many of them are first time buyers. Hopefully they would identify recent practical experience over armchair experts. I can not enforce or predict what most agents do or do not take care of in their own listing appts. Coming from the engineering field, I find most agents are boobs and I can never rely on them. That is just part of the process and you guide your clients through the bogs as best you can.
*****
Like other posters here who foretold all of us about the foreclosure tsunami, I am quite confident that your bold prediction about how this “landmark ruling” will cause a “wholesale change” in the way short sales are conducted is wrong.
I guess time will tell and we will see. I am not saying those changes you suggested would not be very good for the industry. However I prefer to live in the here and now and get things done as best I can within the current framework.
January 30, 2011 at 4:39 PM #660609ParticipantYes it was in a differen tpost but you were talking about the EXACT same thing. In fact in that thread you brought up the Holmes case again and you were referencing it again. In that thread that is where you made your assertion you were going to talk to other realtors to find out how many short sales fell through due to all those deadbeat dads and people with judgements.
Different thread but EXACT same topic and you DID SAY buyers were losing money due to THIS TOPIC we are discussing.
So please don’t say that you did not say something when you clearly did, it doesn’t mattter if it was another thread, it was the same topic. EXACT same topic.
*****
No fortunately (I hope) your posts are not scaring Piggs. Hopefully Piggs work with agents who have done a short sale within the last 19 years. Furthermore there are many more lurkers here then anyone even knows and many of them are first time buyers. Hopefully they would identify recent practical experience over armchair experts. I can not enforce or predict what most agents do or do not take care of in their own listing appts. Coming from the engineering field, I find most agents are boobs and I can never rely on them. That is just part of the process and you guide your clients through the bogs as best you can.
*****
Like other posters here who foretold all of us about the foreclosure tsunami, I am quite confident that your bold prediction about how this “landmark ruling” will cause a “wholesale change” in the way short sales are conducted is wrong.
I guess time will tell and we will see. I am not saying those changes you suggested would not be very good for the industry. However I prefer to live in the here and now and get things done as best I can within the current framework.
January 30, 2011 at 4:39 PM #660747ParticipantYes it was in a differen tpost but you were talking about the EXACT same thing. In fact in that thread you brought up the Holmes case again and you were referencing it again. In that thread that is where you made your assertion you were going to talk to other realtors to find out how many short sales fell through due to all those deadbeat dads and people with judgements.
Different thread but EXACT same topic and you DID SAY buyers were losing money due to THIS TOPIC we are discussing.
So please don’t say that you did not say something when you clearly did, it doesn’t mattter if it was another thread, it was the same topic. EXACT same topic.
*****
No fortunately (I hope) your posts are not scaring Piggs. Hopefully Piggs work with agents who have done a short sale within the last 19 years. Furthermore there are many more lurkers here then anyone even knows and many of them are first time buyers. Hopefully they would identify recent practical experience over armchair experts. I can not enforce or predict what most agents do or do not take care of in their own listing appts. Coming from the engineering field, I find most agents are boobs and I can never rely on them. That is just part of the process and you guide your clients through the bogs as best you can.
*****
Like other posters here who foretold all of us about the foreclosure tsunami, I am quite confident that your bold prediction about how this “landmark ruling” will cause a “wholesale change” in the way short sales are conducted is wrong.
I guess time will tell and we will see. I am not saying those changes you suggested would not be very good for the industry. However I prefer to live in the here and now and get things done as best I can within the current framework.
January 30, 2011 at 4:39 PM #661077ParticipantYes it was in a differen tpost but you were talking about the EXACT same thing. In fact in that thread you brought up the Holmes case again and you were referencing it again. In that thread that is where you made your assertion you were going to talk to other realtors to find out how many short sales fell through due to all those deadbeat dads and people with judgements.
Different thread but EXACT same topic and you DID SAY buyers were losing money due to THIS TOPIC we are discussing.
So please don’t say that you did not say something when you clearly did, it doesn’t mattter if it was another thread, it was the same topic. EXACT same topic.
*****
No fortunately (I hope) your posts are not scaring Piggs. Hopefully Piggs work with agents who have done a short sale within the last 19 years. Furthermore there are many more lurkers here then anyone even knows and many of them are first time buyers. Hopefully they would identify recent practical experience over armchair experts. I can not enforce or predict what most agents do or do not take care of in their own listing appts. Coming from the engineering field, I find most agents are boobs and I can never rely on them. That is just part of the process and you guide your clients through the bogs as best you can.
*****
Like other posters here who foretold all of us about the foreclosure tsunami, I am quite confident that your bold prediction about how this “landmark ruling” will cause a “wholesale change” in the way short sales are conducted is wrong.
I guess time will tell and we will see. I am not saying those changes you suggested would not be very good for the industry. However I prefer to live in the here and now and get things done as best I can within the current framework.
January 30, 2011 at 6:17 PM #659962bearishgurl
Participant[quote=SD Realtor] . . . Like other posters here who foretold all of us about the foreclosure tsunami, I am quite confident that your bold prediction about how this “landmark ruling” will cause a “wholesale change” in the way short sales are conducted is wrong.
I guess time will tell and we will see. I am not saying those changes you suggested would not be very good for the industry. However I prefer to live in the here and now and get things done as best I can within the current framework.[/quote]
A CA Atty Gen’l Opn of the Holmes ruling could spark DRE licensure policy/changes in requirements. A member of the State Assembly from a very hard-hit housing district (such as Merced/Fresno or Inland Empire) could draft and introduce a bill to the legislature in the wake of Holmes which would change the wording or add more sections to the CA Bus & Professions Code.
Just wondering which will happen first. Stay tuned, Piggs!
Just curious, SDR . . . those “early Piggs” who foretold of a “foreclosure tsunami” . . . were they not right in their “bold predictions,” after all?
January 30, 2011 at 6:17 PM #660025Participant[quote=SD Realtor] . . . Like other posters here who foretold all of us about the foreclosure tsunami, I am quite confident that your bold prediction about how this “landmark ruling” will cause a “wholesale change” in the way short sales are conducted is wrong.
I guess time will tell and we will see. I am not saying those changes you suggested would not be very good for the industry. However I prefer to live in the here and now and get things done as best I can within the current framework.[/quote]
A CA Atty Gen’l Opn of the Holmes ruling could spark DRE licensure policy/changes in requirements. A member of the State Assembly from a very hard-hit housing district (such as Merced/Fresno or Inland Empire) could draft and introduce a bill to the legislature in the wake of Holmes which would change the wording or add more sections to the CA Bus & Professions Code.
Just wondering which will happen first. Stay tuned, Piggs!
Just curious, SDR . . . those “early Piggs” who foretold of a “foreclosure tsunami” . . . were they not right in their “bold predictions,” after all?
January 30, 2011 at 6:17 PM #660629Participant[quote=SD Realtor] . . . Like other posters here who foretold all of us about the foreclosure tsunami, I am quite confident that your bold prediction about how this “landmark ruling” will cause a “wholesale change” in the way short sales are conducted is wrong.
I guess time will tell and we will see. I am not saying those changes you suggested would not be very good for the industry. However I prefer to live in the here and now and get things done as best I can within the current framework.[/quote]
A CA Atty Gen’l Opn of the Holmes ruling could spark DRE licensure policy/changes in requirements. A member of the State Assembly from a very hard-hit housing district (such as Merced/Fresno or Inland Empire) could draft and introduce a bill to the legislature in the wake of Holmes which would change the wording or add more sections to the CA Bus & Professions Code.
Just wondering which will happen first. Stay tuned, Piggs!
Just curious, SDR . . . those “early Piggs” who foretold of a “foreclosure tsunami” . . . were they not right in their “bold predictions,” after all?
January 30, 2011 at 6:17 PM #660767Participant[quote=SD Realtor] . . . Like other posters here who foretold all of us about the foreclosure tsunami, I am quite confident that your bold prediction about how this “landmark ruling” will cause a “wholesale change” in the way short sales are conducted is wrong.
I guess time will tell and we will see. I am not saying those changes you suggested would not be very good for the industry. However I prefer to live in the here and now and get things done as best I can within the current framework.[/quote]
A CA Atty Gen’l Opn of the Holmes ruling could spark DRE licensure policy/changes in requirements. A member of the State Assembly from a very hard-hit housing district (such as Merced/Fresno or Inland Empire) could draft and introduce a bill to the legislature in the wake of Holmes which would change the wording or add more sections to the CA Bus & Professions Code.
Just wondering which will happen first. Stay tuned, Piggs!
Just curious, SDR . . . those “early Piggs” who foretold of a “foreclosure tsunami” . . . were they not right in their “bold predictions,” after all?
January 30, 2011 at 6:17 PM #661097Participant[quote=SD Realtor] . . . Like other posters here who foretold all of us about the foreclosure tsunami, I am quite confident that your bold prediction about how this “landmark ruling” will cause a “wholesale change” in the way short sales are conducted is wrong.
I guess time will tell and we will see. I am not saying those changes you suggested would not be very good for the industry. However I prefer to live in the here and now and get things done as best I can within the current framework.[/quote]
A CA Atty Gen’l Opn of the Holmes ruling could spark DRE licensure policy/changes in requirements. A member of the State Assembly from a very hard-hit housing district (such as Merced/Fresno or Inland Empire) could draft and introduce a bill to the legislature in the wake of Holmes which would change the wording or add more sections to the CA Bus & Professions Code.
Just wondering which will happen first. Stay tuned, Piggs!
Just curious, SDR . . . those “early Piggs” who foretold of a “foreclosure tsunami” . . . were they not right in their “bold predictions,” after all?
January 30, 2011 at 6:22 PM #659967
CoronitaParticipantThis thread is just getting too weird for me….
January 30, 2011 at 6:22 PM #660030CoronitaParticipantThis thread is just getting too weird for me….
January 30, 2011 at 6:22 PM #660634CoronitaParticipantThis thread is just getting too weird for me….
January 30, 2011 at 6:22 PM #660772CoronitaParticipantThis thread is just getting too weird for me….
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.