Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Landlord Wants To Sell Leased House
- This topic has 50 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 1, 2010 at 7:43 AM #574382July 1, 2010 at 7:46 AM #575315SD RealtorParticipant
Ummm… not really true at all DataAgent. Every case is unique. It depends on the property. It depends on the tenant, and it depends on the intent of the owner. An astute owner/flipper knows tenants that are slobs and uncooperative hurt the chances for better profit and having the tenant out is much better. If the home needs work then having the tenant out is much better. We have found in ALL of our deals that having the tenant out worked out better.
July 1, 2010 at 7:46 AM #574910SD RealtorParticipantUmmm… not really true at all DataAgent. Every case is unique. It depends on the property. It depends on the tenant, and it depends on the intent of the owner. An astute owner/flipper knows tenants that are slobs and uncooperative hurt the chances for better profit and having the tenant out is much better. If the home needs work then having the tenant out is much better. We have found in ALL of our deals that having the tenant out worked out better.
July 1, 2010 at 7:46 AM #574387SD RealtorParticipantUmmm… not really true at all DataAgent. Every case is unique. It depends on the property. It depends on the tenant, and it depends on the intent of the owner. An astute owner/flipper knows tenants that are slobs and uncooperative hurt the chances for better profit and having the tenant out is much better. If the home needs work then having the tenant out is much better. We have found in ALL of our deals that having the tenant out worked out better.
July 1, 2010 at 7:46 AM #574289SD RealtorParticipantUmmm… not really true at all DataAgent. Every case is unique. It depends on the property. It depends on the tenant, and it depends on the intent of the owner. An astute owner/flipper knows tenants that are slobs and uncooperative hurt the chances for better profit and having the tenant out is much better. If the home needs work then having the tenant out is much better. We have found in ALL of our deals that having the tenant out worked out better.
July 1, 2010 at 7:46 AM #575016SD RealtorParticipantUmmm… not really true at all DataAgent. Every case is unique. It depends on the property. It depends on the tenant, and it depends on the intent of the owner. An astute owner/flipper knows tenants that are slobs and uncooperative hurt the chances for better profit and having the tenant out is much better. If the home needs work then having the tenant out is much better. We have found in ALL of our deals that having the tenant out worked out better.
July 1, 2010 at 7:53 AM #575320DataAgentParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Ummm… not really true at all DataAgent. Every case is unique. It depends on the property. It depends on the tenant, and it depends on the intent of the owner. An astute owner/flipper knows tenants that are slobs and uncooperative hurt the chances for better profit and having the tenant out is much better. If the home needs work then having the tenant out is much better. We have found in ALL of our deals that having the tenant out worked out better.[/quote]
I’ve been in this situation as the renter. I was paying market rent. The owner would not even consider letting me out of my lease. He needed my rent money to pay his mortgage while the house was for sale.
Foreclosure and REO sales are different. Tenant squatters don’t pay rent. It’s to the new owners advantage to pay a ‘cash for keys’ amount.
July 1, 2010 at 7:53 AM #574392DataAgentParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Ummm… not really true at all DataAgent. Every case is unique. It depends on the property. It depends on the tenant, and it depends on the intent of the owner. An astute owner/flipper knows tenants that are slobs and uncooperative hurt the chances for better profit and having the tenant out is much better. If the home needs work then having the tenant out is much better. We have found in ALL of our deals that having the tenant out worked out better.[/quote]
I’ve been in this situation as the renter. I was paying market rent. The owner would not even consider letting me out of my lease. He needed my rent money to pay his mortgage while the house was for sale.
Foreclosure and REO sales are different. Tenant squatters don’t pay rent. It’s to the new owners advantage to pay a ‘cash for keys’ amount.
July 1, 2010 at 7:53 AM #574915DataAgentParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Ummm… not really true at all DataAgent. Every case is unique. It depends on the property. It depends on the tenant, and it depends on the intent of the owner. An astute owner/flipper knows tenants that are slobs and uncooperative hurt the chances for better profit and having the tenant out is much better. If the home needs work then having the tenant out is much better. We have found in ALL of our deals that having the tenant out worked out better.[/quote]
I’ve been in this situation as the renter. I was paying market rent. The owner would not even consider letting me out of my lease. He needed my rent money to pay his mortgage while the house was for sale.
Foreclosure and REO sales are different. Tenant squatters don’t pay rent. It’s to the new owners advantage to pay a ‘cash for keys’ amount.
July 1, 2010 at 7:53 AM #574294DataAgentParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Ummm… not really true at all DataAgent. Every case is unique. It depends on the property. It depends on the tenant, and it depends on the intent of the owner. An astute owner/flipper knows tenants that are slobs and uncooperative hurt the chances for better profit and having the tenant out is much better. If the home needs work then having the tenant out is much better. We have found in ALL of our deals that having the tenant out worked out better.[/quote]
I’ve been in this situation as the renter. I was paying market rent. The owner would not even consider letting me out of my lease. He needed my rent money to pay his mortgage while the house was for sale.
Foreclosure and REO sales are different. Tenant squatters don’t pay rent. It’s to the new owners advantage to pay a ‘cash for keys’ amount.
July 1, 2010 at 7:53 AM #575021DataAgentParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Ummm… not really true at all DataAgent. Every case is unique. It depends on the property. It depends on the tenant, and it depends on the intent of the owner. An astute owner/flipper knows tenants that are slobs and uncooperative hurt the chances for better profit and having the tenant out is much better. If the home needs work then having the tenant out is much better. We have found in ALL of our deals that having the tenant out worked out better.[/quote]
I’ve been in this situation as the renter. I was paying market rent. The owner would not even consider letting me out of my lease. He needed my rent money to pay his mortgage while the house was for sale.
Foreclosure and REO sales are different. Tenant squatters don’t pay rent. It’s to the new owners advantage to pay a ‘cash for keys’ amount.
July 1, 2010 at 8:19 AM #575325SD RealtorParticipantAgreed every situation is different. The original landlords are usually never inclined to skip rent so yes they keep people in. However I took from the op that he was more concerned that the new landlord is going to flip the home. Thus if indeed the new landlord was going to flip the home I think he would offer cash for keys.
Also even with trustee sales, actually tenant/squatters are OBLIGATED to pay rent under the lease terms or else evictions can start immediately. However if they do pay the rent then the landlords hands are tied.
July 1, 2010 at 8:19 AM #575026SD RealtorParticipantAgreed every situation is different. The original landlords are usually never inclined to skip rent so yes they keep people in. However I took from the op that he was more concerned that the new landlord is going to flip the home. Thus if indeed the new landlord was going to flip the home I think he would offer cash for keys.
Also even with trustee sales, actually tenant/squatters are OBLIGATED to pay rent under the lease terms or else evictions can start immediately. However if they do pay the rent then the landlords hands are tied.
July 1, 2010 at 8:19 AM #574920SD RealtorParticipantAgreed every situation is different. The original landlords are usually never inclined to skip rent so yes they keep people in. However I took from the op that he was more concerned that the new landlord is going to flip the home. Thus if indeed the new landlord was going to flip the home I think he would offer cash for keys.
Also even with trustee sales, actually tenant/squatters are OBLIGATED to pay rent under the lease terms or else evictions can start immediately. However if they do pay the rent then the landlords hands are tied.
July 1, 2010 at 8:19 AM #574397SD RealtorParticipantAgreed every situation is different. The original landlords are usually never inclined to skip rent so yes they keep people in. However I took from the op that he was more concerned that the new landlord is going to flip the home. Thus if indeed the new landlord was going to flip the home I think he would offer cash for keys.
Also even with trustee sales, actually tenant/squatters are OBLIGATED to pay rent under the lease terms or else evictions can start immediately. However if they do pay the rent then the landlords hands are tied.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.