- This topic has 30 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 10 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 11, 2011 at 4:08 AM #651829January 11, 2011 at 5:46 AM #651122NavydocParticipant
As many on this forum know, I was in this exact situation spring 09. I talked to a Jag first, and he reiterated what was said before, the lease is between you and the landlord, not the bank. You have no right to escrow your rent, you made an agreement to pay them the money, and they can toss you out if you don’t. I realize it doesn’t seem fair, as the bank is likely to toss you when he/she loses the place, but that’s a different battle.
I found what worked for me was after I found out what my rights were, (you may be able to break the lease if you can prove the place is delinquent, but that will necessitate a move on your part) I simply confronted the landlord with the facts. I worked out a deal where I was able to use my security deposit as the last 2 months rent, and they were cool with that. In all likelihood you’re going to have to move anyway, so this might be an option for you. Good luck whatever happens, I can tell you from personal experience what a frustrating/maddening situation this is.
By the way, I’ll never forget what my landlord said when I asked him if he was planning to walk away: “It go down!” (the value of the property of course)
January 11, 2011 at 5:46 AM #652167NavydocParticipantAs many on this forum know, I was in this exact situation spring 09. I talked to a Jag first, and he reiterated what was said before, the lease is between you and the landlord, not the bank. You have no right to escrow your rent, you made an agreement to pay them the money, and they can toss you out if you don’t. I realize it doesn’t seem fair, as the bank is likely to toss you when he/she loses the place, but that’s a different battle.
I found what worked for me was after I found out what my rights were, (you may be able to break the lease if you can prove the place is delinquent, but that will necessitate a move on your part) I simply confronted the landlord with the facts. I worked out a deal where I was able to use my security deposit as the last 2 months rent, and they were cool with that. In all likelihood you’re going to have to move anyway, so this might be an option for you. Good luck whatever happens, I can tell you from personal experience what a frustrating/maddening situation this is.
By the way, I’ll never forget what my landlord said when I asked him if he was planning to walk away: “It go down!” (the value of the property of course)
January 11, 2011 at 5:46 AM #651839NavydocParticipantAs many on this forum know, I was in this exact situation spring 09. I talked to a Jag first, and he reiterated what was said before, the lease is between you and the landlord, not the bank. You have no right to escrow your rent, you made an agreement to pay them the money, and they can toss you out if you don’t. I realize it doesn’t seem fair, as the bank is likely to toss you when he/she loses the place, but that’s a different battle.
I found what worked for me was after I found out what my rights were, (you may be able to break the lease if you can prove the place is delinquent, but that will necessitate a move on your part) I simply confronted the landlord with the facts. I worked out a deal where I was able to use my security deposit as the last 2 months rent, and they were cool with that. In all likelihood you’re going to have to move anyway, so this might be an option for you. Good luck whatever happens, I can tell you from personal experience what a frustrating/maddening situation this is.
By the way, I’ll never forget what my landlord said when I asked him if he was planning to walk away: “It go down!” (the value of the property of course)
January 11, 2011 at 5:46 AM #651054NavydocParticipantAs many on this forum know, I was in this exact situation spring 09. I talked to a Jag first, and he reiterated what was said before, the lease is between you and the landlord, not the bank. You have no right to escrow your rent, you made an agreement to pay them the money, and they can toss you out if you don’t. I realize it doesn’t seem fair, as the bank is likely to toss you when he/she loses the place, but that’s a different battle.
I found what worked for me was after I found out what my rights were, (you may be able to break the lease if you can prove the place is delinquent, but that will necessitate a move on your part) I simply confronted the landlord with the facts. I worked out a deal where I was able to use my security deposit as the last 2 months rent, and they were cool with that. In all likelihood you’re going to have to move anyway, so this might be an option for you. Good luck whatever happens, I can tell you from personal experience what a frustrating/maddening situation this is.
By the way, I’ll never forget what my landlord said when I asked him if he was planning to walk away: “It go down!” (the value of the property of course)
January 11, 2011 at 5:46 AM #651703NavydocParticipantAs many on this forum know, I was in this exact situation spring 09. I talked to a Jag first, and he reiterated what was said before, the lease is between you and the landlord, not the bank. You have no right to escrow your rent, you made an agreement to pay them the money, and they can toss you out if you don’t. I realize it doesn’t seem fair, as the bank is likely to toss you when he/she loses the place, but that’s a different battle.
I found what worked for me was after I found out what my rights were, (you may be able to break the lease if you can prove the place is delinquent, but that will necessitate a move on your part) I simply confronted the landlord with the facts. I worked out a deal where I was able to use my security deposit as the last 2 months rent, and they were cool with that. In all likelihood you’re going to have to move anyway, so this might be an option for you. Good luck whatever happens, I can tell you from personal experience what a frustrating/maddening situation this is.
By the way, I’ll never forget what my landlord said when I asked him if he was planning to walk away: “It go down!” (the value of the property of course)
January 11, 2011 at 6:19 AM #651708EconProfParticipantYou are in a bind because you may get shafted on your deposit, and/or be forced to move on short notice. At the same time, your landlord is in a bind because if you move or demand your current deposit be immediately applied to rent (one approach you could offer now), he stands to lose.
Here’s another approach out of left field: Offer to rewrite the current rental agreement at 80% (or 90%) of the current monthly rent, on a month-to-month basis. He gets to keep cash flow until he loses the property, which could be a year or two at current rates. He doesn’t have to deal with a month or two of vacancy before finding a new tenant (whom he’d have to decide whether or not to inform about the default), so money-wise he is neutral or ahead. As for you, you get to bank the rent reduction for what could be a long time and still have the flexibility to move on a month-to-month basis.
Piggs, what do you think? Slings and arrows welcomed.January 11, 2011 at 6:19 AM #651844EconProfParticipantYou are in a bind because you may get shafted on your deposit, and/or be forced to move on short notice. At the same time, your landlord is in a bind because if you move or demand your current deposit be immediately applied to rent (one approach you could offer now), he stands to lose.
Here’s another approach out of left field: Offer to rewrite the current rental agreement at 80% (or 90%) of the current monthly rent, on a month-to-month basis. He gets to keep cash flow until he loses the property, which could be a year or two at current rates. He doesn’t have to deal with a month or two of vacancy before finding a new tenant (whom he’d have to decide whether or not to inform about the default), so money-wise he is neutral or ahead. As for you, you get to bank the rent reduction for what could be a long time and still have the flexibility to move on a month-to-month basis.
Piggs, what do you think? Slings and arrows welcomed.January 11, 2011 at 6:19 AM #651059EconProfParticipantYou are in a bind because you may get shafted on your deposit, and/or be forced to move on short notice. At the same time, your landlord is in a bind because if you move or demand your current deposit be immediately applied to rent (one approach you could offer now), he stands to lose.
Here’s another approach out of left field: Offer to rewrite the current rental agreement at 80% (or 90%) of the current monthly rent, on a month-to-month basis. He gets to keep cash flow until he loses the property, which could be a year or two at current rates. He doesn’t have to deal with a month or two of vacancy before finding a new tenant (whom he’d have to decide whether or not to inform about the default), so money-wise he is neutral or ahead. As for you, you get to bank the rent reduction for what could be a long time and still have the flexibility to move on a month-to-month basis.
Piggs, what do you think? Slings and arrows welcomed.January 11, 2011 at 6:19 AM #651127EconProfParticipantYou are in a bind because you may get shafted on your deposit, and/or be forced to move on short notice. At the same time, your landlord is in a bind because if you move or demand your current deposit be immediately applied to rent (one approach you could offer now), he stands to lose.
Here’s another approach out of left field: Offer to rewrite the current rental agreement at 80% (or 90%) of the current monthly rent, on a month-to-month basis. He gets to keep cash flow until he loses the property, which could be a year or two at current rates. He doesn’t have to deal with a month or two of vacancy before finding a new tenant (whom he’d have to decide whether or not to inform about the default), so money-wise he is neutral or ahead. As for you, you get to bank the rent reduction for what could be a long time and still have the flexibility to move on a month-to-month basis.
Piggs, what do you think? Slings and arrows welcomed.January 11, 2011 at 6:19 AM #652172EconProfParticipantYou are in a bind because you may get shafted on your deposit, and/or be forced to move on short notice. At the same time, your landlord is in a bind because if you move or demand your current deposit be immediately applied to rent (one approach you could offer now), he stands to lose.
Here’s another approach out of left field: Offer to rewrite the current rental agreement at 80% (or 90%) of the current monthly rent, on a month-to-month basis. He gets to keep cash flow until he loses the property, which could be a year or two at current rates. He doesn’t have to deal with a month or two of vacancy before finding a new tenant (whom he’d have to decide whether or not to inform about the default), so money-wise he is neutral or ahead. As for you, you get to bank the rent reduction for what could be a long time and still have the flexibility to move on a month-to-month basis.
Piggs, what do you think? Slings and arrows welcomed.January 11, 2011 at 6:28 AM #651719SD RealtorParticipantI am sorry but tend to look at this the other way. You may not get your deposit back but I would call it far from being in a bind.
When we purchased homes at trustee sales we HATED IT when they were tenant occupied. The fact of the matter is that there are UBER protections for tenants who occupy foreclosed homes. First and foremost, you cannot be evicted as long as you continue to honor the lease. This is an assumption that the lease is bona fide and was an arms length transaction AND is charging market rent. It must be honored by the new owner to FULL TERM.
In all probability if the home IS foreclosed on you can negotiate a sweet offer with the new owner for a buyout. As someone who used to negotiate these with the tenants we just wanted them out asap so we gave them a great deal covering their deposit and moving costs.
So if I were you I would be rather optimistic. Check with any attorney you want. As long as that lease is valid, you are in the catbirds seat.
January 11, 2011 at 6:28 AM #651854SD RealtorParticipantI am sorry but tend to look at this the other way. You may not get your deposit back but I would call it far from being in a bind.
When we purchased homes at trustee sales we HATED IT when they were tenant occupied. The fact of the matter is that there are UBER protections for tenants who occupy foreclosed homes. First and foremost, you cannot be evicted as long as you continue to honor the lease. This is an assumption that the lease is bona fide and was an arms length transaction AND is charging market rent. It must be honored by the new owner to FULL TERM.
In all probability if the home IS foreclosed on you can negotiate a sweet offer with the new owner for a buyout. As someone who used to negotiate these with the tenants we just wanted them out asap so we gave them a great deal covering their deposit and moving costs.
So if I were you I would be rather optimistic. Check with any attorney you want. As long as that lease is valid, you are in the catbirds seat.
January 11, 2011 at 6:28 AM #651069SD RealtorParticipantI am sorry but tend to look at this the other way. You may not get your deposit back but I would call it far from being in a bind.
When we purchased homes at trustee sales we HATED IT when they were tenant occupied. The fact of the matter is that there are UBER protections for tenants who occupy foreclosed homes. First and foremost, you cannot be evicted as long as you continue to honor the lease. This is an assumption that the lease is bona fide and was an arms length transaction AND is charging market rent. It must be honored by the new owner to FULL TERM.
In all probability if the home IS foreclosed on you can negotiate a sweet offer with the new owner for a buyout. As someone who used to negotiate these with the tenants we just wanted them out asap so we gave them a great deal covering their deposit and moving costs.
So if I were you I would be rather optimistic. Check with any attorney you want. As long as that lease is valid, you are in the catbirds seat.
January 11, 2011 at 6:28 AM #651137SD RealtorParticipantI am sorry but tend to look at this the other way. You may not get your deposit back but I would call it far from being in a bind.
When we purchased homes at trustee sales we HATED IT when they were tenant occupied. The fact of the matter is that there are UBER protections for tenants who occupy foreclosed homes. First and foremost, you cannot be evicted as long as you continue to honor the lease. This is an assumption that the lease is bona fide and was an arms length transaction AND is charging market rent. It must be honored by the new owner to FULL TERM.
In all probability if the home IS foreclosed on you can negotiate a sweet offer with the new owner for a buyout. As someone who used to negotiate these with the tenants we just wanted them out asap so we gave them a great deal covering their deposit and moving costs.
So if I were you I would be rather optimistic. Check with any attorney you want. As long as that lease is valid, you are in the catbirds seat.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.