- This topic has 150 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by 4plexowner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 30, 2007 at 10:51 AM #105695November 30, 2007 at 11:02 AM #105551LA_RenterParticipant
” If paychecks increase”
I don’t see that inflation going into paychecks. Look the housing bubble popped as in past tense. We are way past the point of propping this up. Japan, which is looking like a good comparison with each passing day is a classic example. Their property market has fallen for 20 years with a ZIRP policy. The housing correction is going to play out, even the blow hards on wall street acknowledge that.
November 30, 2007 at 11:02 AM #105641LA_RenterParticipant” If paychecks increase”
I don’t see that inflation going into paychecks. Look the housing bubble popped as in past tense. We are way past the point of propping this up. Japan, which is looking like a good comparison with each passing day is a classic example. Their property market has fallen for 20 years with a ZIRP policy. The housing correction is going to play out, even the blow hards on wall street acknowledge that.
November 30, 2007 at 11:02 AM #105674LA_RenterParticipant” If paychecks increase”
I don’t see that inflation going into paychecks. Look the housing bubble popped as in past tense. We are way past the point of propping this up. Japan, which is looking like a good comparison with each passing day is a classic example. Their property market has fallen for 20 years with a ZIRP policy. The housing correction is going to play out, even the blow hards on wall street acknowledge that.
November 30, 2007 at 11:02 AM #105682LA_RenterParticipant” If paychecks increase”
I don’t see that inflation going into paychecks. Look the housing bubble popped as in past tense. We are way past the point of propping this up. Japan, which is looking like a good comparison with each passing day is a classic example. Their property market has fallen for 20 years with a ZIRP policy. The housing correction is going to play out, even the blow hards on wall street acknowledge that.
November 30, 2007 at 11:02 AM #105701LA_RenterParticipant” If paychecks increase”
I don’t see that inflation going into paychecks. Look the housing bubble popped as in past tense. We are way past the point of propping this up. Japan, which is looking like a good comparison with each passing day is a classic example. Their property market has fallen for 20 years with a ZIRP policy. The housing correction is going to play out, even the blow hards on wall street acknowledge that.
November 30, 2007 at 11:06 AM #105556NotCrankyParticipantI still don’t see how any of this will stop the depreciation of homes. The fundamental fact is that wages aren’t rising and the average person can’t afford the average house and there won’t be a return to easy lending and interest only loans.
Radelow, posts in the last couple of days, on various threads seemed to bring the consensus to the point where it is agreed house hold incomes have risen? Of course there are exceptions for RE related and will be for not so recession proof positions.
I look at loan modification, moratoriums, credit infusions and rate manipulation to the downside as potential delay tactics and damage control. I would think they should have some effect. There are so many unsalvagable properties out there that the correction will be fast despite any efforts to the contrary but the floor will be brought up to the extent any salvage can be successful. Just food for thought.
November 30, 2007 at 11:06 AM #105646NotCrankyParticipantI still don’t see how any of this will stop the depreciation of homes. The fundamental fact is that wages aren’t rising and the average person can’t afford the average house and there won’t be a return to easy lending and interest only loans.
Radelow, posts in the last couple of days, on various threads seemed to bring the consensus to the point where it is agreed house hold incomes have risen? Of course there are exceptions for RE related and will be for not so recession proof positions.
I look at loan modification, moratoriums, credit infusions and rate manipulation to the downside as potential delay tactics and damage control. I would think they should have some effect. There are so many unsalvagable properties out there that the correction will be fast despite any efforts to the contrary but the floor will be brought up to the extent any salvage can be successful. Just food for thought.
November 30, 2007 at 11:06 AM #105680NotCrankyParticipantI still don’t see how any of this will stop the depreciation of homes. The fundamental fact is that wages aren’t rising and the average person can’t afford the average house and there won’t be a return to easy lending and interest only loans.
Radelow, posts in the last couple of days, on various threads seemed to bring the consensus to the point where it is agreed house hold incomes have risen? Of course there are exceptions for RE related and will be for not so recession proof positions.
I look at loan modification, moratoriums, credit infusions and rate manipulation to the downside as potential delay tactics and damage control. I would think they should have some effect. There are so many unsalvagable properties out there that the correction will be fast despite any efforts to the contrary but the floor will be brought up to the extent any salvage can be successful. Just food for thought.
November 30, 2007 at 11:06 AM #105687NotCrankyParticipantI still don’t see how any of this will stop the depreciation of homes. The fundamental fact is that wages aren’t rising and the average person can’t afford the average house and there won’t be a return to easy lending and interest only loans.
Radelow, posts in the last couple of days, on various threads seemed to bring the consensus to the point where it is agreed house hold incomes have risen? Of course there are exceptions for RE related and will be for not so recession proof positions.
I look at loan modification, moratoriums, credit infusions and rate manipulation to the downside as potential delay tactics and damage control. I would think they should have some effect. There are so many unsalvagable properties out there that the correction will be fast despite any efforts to the contrary but the floor will be brought up to the extent any salvage can be successful. Just food for thought.
November 30, 2007 at 11:06 AM #105706NotCrankyParticipantI still don’t see how any of this will stop the depreciation of homes. The fundamental fact is that wages aren’t rising and the average person can’t afford the average house and there won’t be a return to easy lending and interest only loans.
Radelow, posts in the last couple of days, on various threads seemed to bring the consensus to the point where it is agreed house hold incomes have risen? Of course there are exceptions for RE related and will be for not so recession proof positions.
I look at loan modification, moratoriums, credit infusions and rate manipulation to the downside as potential delay tactics and damage control. I would think they should have some effect. There are so many unsalvagable properties out there that the correction will be fast despite any efforts to the contrary but the floor will be brought up to the extent any salvage can be successful. Just food for thought.
November 30, 2007 at 11:17 AM #105566jeemanParticipantActually, you should read the “Forgotten Man”. The myth is that the gov’t did nothing, exacerbating the fallout from the stock market.
In reality, the government was raising taxes due to lowered revenues from the stock market losses, etc. The uncertainty that gov’t intervention caused made the Great Depression last all 8 years of FDR’s first two terms. Investors don’t know what to do if they think that owning gold will be illegal or legal, if taxes will be raised, etc.
Think about what would happen if Hillary pushes for raising long term capital gains taxes to your regular income rate by the end of 2009….the market will take a huge nosedive by the end of that year, as everyone rushes take advantage of the 15% rate that is currently in place.
This is the kind of stuff that occurred in the 30s. The left in the this country revised history saying that government is the nice benevolent force that can come to the rescue. This is erroneous.
Jeeman
November 30, 2007 at 11:17 AM #105656jeemanParticipantActually, you should read the “Forgotten Man”. The myth is that the gov’t did nothing, exacerbating the fallout from the stock market.
In reality, the government was raising taxes due to lowered revenues from the stock market losses, etc. The uncertainty that gov’t intervention caused made the Great Depression last all 8 years of FDR’s first two terms. Investors don’t know what to do if they think that owning gold will be illegal or legal, if taxes will be raised, etc.
Think about what would happen if Hillary pushes for raising long term capital gains taxes to your regular income rate by the end of 2009….the market will take a huge nosedive by the end of that year, as everyone rushes take advantage of the 15% rate that is currently in place.
This is the kind of stuff that occurred in the 30s. The left in the this country revised history saying that government is the nice benevolent force that can come to the rescue. This is erroneous.
Jeeman
November 30, 2007 at 11:17 AM #105688jeemanParticipantActually, you should read the “Forgotten Man”. The myth is that the gov’t did nothing, exacerbating the fallout from the stock market.
In reality, the government was raising taxes due to lowered revenues from the stock market losses, etc. The uncertainty that gov’t intervention caused made the Great Depression last all 8 years of FDR’s first two terms. Investors don’t know what to do if they think that owning gold will be illegal or legal, if taxes will be raised, etc.
Think about what would happen if Hillary pushes for raising long term capital gains taxes to your regular income rate by the end of 2009….the market will take a huge nosedive by the end of that year, as everyone rushes take advantage of the 15% rate that is currently in place.
This is the kind of stuff that occurred in the 30s. The left in the this country revised history saying that government is the nice benevolent force that can come to the rescue. This is erroneous.
Jeeman
November 30, 2007 at 11:17 AM #105697jeemanParticipantActually, you should read the “Forgotten Man”. The myth is that the gov’t did nothing, exacerbating the fallout from the stock market.
In reality, the government was raising taxes due to lowered revenues from the stock market losses, etc. The uncertainty that gov’t intervention caused made the Great Depression last all 8 years of FDR’s first two terms. Investors don’t know what to do if they think that owning gold will be illegal or legal, if taxes will be raised, etc.
Think about what would happen if Hillary pushes for raising long term capital gains taxes to your regular income rate by the end of 2009….the market will take a huge nosedive by the end of that year, as everyone rushes take advantage of the 15% rate that is currently in place.
This is the kind of stuff that occurred in the 30s. The left in the this country revised history saying that government is the nice benevolent force that can come to the rescue. This is erroneous.
Jeeman
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.