- This topic has 80 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 14, 2008 at 10:16 AM #14207October 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM #287138PadreBrianParticipant
NO! This is the worst thing you can do. Some of the new FHA loans require you to have made payments on time and current.
Call you bank and renegotiate.
October 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM #287482PadreBrianParticipantNO! This is the worst thing you can do. Some of the new FHA loans require you to have made payments on time and current.
Call you bank and renegotiate.
October 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM #287476PadreBrianParticipantNO! This is the worst thing you can do. Some of the new FHA loans require you to have made payments on time and current.
Call you bank and renegotiate.
October 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM #287434PadreBrianParticipantNO! This is the worst thing you can do. Some of the new FHA loans require you to have made payments on time and current.
Call you bank and renegotiate.
October 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM #287450PadreBrianParticipantNO! This is the worst thing you can do. Some of the new FHA loans require you to have made payments on time and current.
Call you bank and renegotiate.
October 14, 2008 at 10:52 AM #287153sdrealtorParticipantPeter would love people to do this as it would make him lots of money on the downside and prove his big ego correct. He’s not a disinterested party. If you have assets and income there are ways out by working with your lenders.
October 14, 2008 at 10:52 AM #287497sdrealtorParticipantPeter would love people to do this as it would make him lots of money on the downside and prove his big ego correct. He’s not a disinterested party. If you have assets and income there are ways out by working with your lenders.
October 14, 2008 at 10:52 AM #287491sdrealtorParticipantPeter would love people to do this as it would make him lots of money on the downside and prove his big ego correct. He’s not a disinterested party. If you have assets and income there are ways out by working with your lenders.
October 14, 2008 at 10:52 AM #287465sdrealtorParticipantPeter would love people to do this as it would make him lots of money on the downside and prove his big ego correct. He’s not a disinterested party. If you have assets and income there are ways out by working with your lenders.
October 14, 2008 at 10:52 AM #287449sdrealtorParticipantPeter would love people to do this as it would make him lots of money on the downside and prove his big ego correct. He’s not a disinterested party. If you have assets and income there are ways out by working with your lenders.
October 14, 2008 at 11:03 AM #287470underdoseParticipantI certainly do not get the impression that Peter Schiff is endorsing or encouraging non-payment, he is merely pointing out how strong the incentive for non-payment is. He is saying, “Here are the unintended consequences, plan as day.” There is no refuting his logic that there will be blowback for this bailout. Incidentally, Rich has been making the same arguments. I hold these truths (that the bailout will not work as advertised) to be self-evident. What never ceases to astonish me is how almost no members of congress are able to grasp these truths, even after they have been spelled out so clearly.
October 14, 2008 at 11:03 AM #287502underdoseParticipantI certainly do not get the impression that Peter Schiff is endorsing or encouraging non-payment, he is merely pointing out how strong the incentive for non-payment is. He is saying, “Here are the unintended consequences, plan as day.” There is no refuting his logic that there will be blowback for this bailout. Incidentally, Rich has been making the same arguments. I hold these truths (that the bailout will not work as advertised) to be self-evident. What never ceases to astonish me is how almost no members of congress are able to grasp these truths, even after they have been spelled out so clearly.
October 14, 2008 at 11:03 AM #287496underdoseParticipantI certainly do not get the impression that Peter Schiff is endorsing or encouraging non-payment, he is merely pointing out how strong the incentive for non-payment is. He is saying, “Here are the unintended consequences, plan as day.” There is no refuting his logic that there will be blowback for this bailout. Incidentally, Rich has been making the same arguments. I hold these truths (that the bailout will not work as advertised) to be self-evident. What never ceases to astonish me is how almost no members of congress are able to grasp these truths, even after they have been spelled out so clearly.
October 14, 2008 at 11:03 AM #287454underdoseParticipantI certainly do not get the impression that Peter Schiff is endorsing or encouraging non-payment, he is merely pointing out how strong the incentive for non-payment is. He is saying, “Here are the unintended consequences, plan as day.” There is no refuting his logic that there will be blowback for this bailout. Incidentally, Rich has been making the same arguments. I hold these truths (that the bailout will not work as advertised) to be self-evident. What never ceases to astonish me is how almost no members of congress are able to grasp these truths, even after they have been spelled out so clearly.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.